Skip to main content
Log in

A new model test in high energy physics in frequentist and Bayesian statistical formalisms

  • Computer Technologies in Physics
  • Published:
Physics of Particles and Nuclei Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A problem of a new physical model test given observed experimental data is a typical one for modern experiments of high energy physics (HEP). A solution of the problem may be provided with two alternative statistical formalisms, namely frequentist and Bayesian, which are widely spread in contemporary HEP searches. A characteristic experimental situation is modeled from general considerations and both the approaches are utilized in order to test a new model. The results are juxtaposed, what demonstrates their consistency in this work. An effect of a systematic uncertainty treatment in the statistical analysis is also considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. Gusev, V. Kotlyar, V. Kukhtenkov, E. Popova, N. Savin, and A. Soldatov, “WLCG Tier-2 computing infrastructure at IHEP,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Distributed Computing and Grid-Technologies in Science and Education, Dubna (JINR, 2012), pp. 150–157.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Baak, G. J. Besjes, D. Côté, A. Koutsman, J. Lorenz, and D. Short, “HistFitter software framework for statistical data analysis,” Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 153 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Caldwell, D. Kollar, and K. Kroninger, “BAT: the Bayesian analysis toolkit,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 180, 2197–2209 (2009).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Stuart and K. Ord, Kendall’s Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol. 1: Distribution Theory (Wiley-Blackwell, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Stuart, K. Ord, and S. Arnold, Kendall’s Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol. 2A: Classical Inference and the Linear Models (Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. O’Hagan and J. Foster, Kendall’s Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol. 2B: Bayesian Inference (Wiley-Blackwell, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  7. W. Verkerke and D. P. Kirkby, “The RooFit toolkit for data modeling,” in Proceedings of the Conference Statistical Problems in Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology, PHYSTAT05, Oxford, UK, Sept. 12–15, 2005, eConf C0303241, 186–189 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells, “Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics,” Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1554 (2011); Eur. Phys. J. C 73, 2501(E) (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. A. L. Read, “Presentation of search results: the CL(s) technique,” in Proceedings of the Conference on Advanced Statistical Techniques in Particle Physics, Durham, UK, March 18–22, 2002, J. Phys. G 28, 2693–2704 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  10. K. Cranmer, “Practical statistics for the LHC,” in Proceedings of the 2011 European School of High-Energy Physics ESHEP 2011 (2014), pp. 267–308.

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. Moneta, K. Belasco, K. Cranmer, S. Kreiss, A. Lazzaro, D. Piparo, G. Schott, W. Verkerke, and M. Wolf, “The RooStats project,” in Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Advanced Computing and Analysis Techniques in Physics Research ACAT2010, PoS(ACAT2010) 057.

  12. G. Schott, “Hypothesis testing,” in Data Analysis in High Energy Physics: A Practical Guide to Statistical Methods, Ed. by O. Behnke, K. Kröninger, Th. Schörner-Sadenius, and G. Schott (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2013), pp. 75–105.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. H. B. Prosper, “Applications in astronomy,” in Data Analysis in High Energy Physics: A Practical Guide to Statistical Methods, Ed. by O. Behnke, K. Kröninger, Th. Schörner-Sadenius, and G. Schott (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2013), pp. 381–407.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. R. Trotta, “Bayes in the sky: Bayesian inference and model selection in cosmology,” Contemp. Phys. 49, 71–104 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. R. Wanke, “How to deal with systematic uncertainties,” in Data Analysis in High Energy Physics: A Practical Guide to Statistical Methods, Ed. by O. Behnke, K. Kröninger, Th. Schörner-Sadenius, and G. Schott (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2013), pp. 263–296.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. D. S. Sivia, “Dealing with systematics and setting limits,” in Proceedings of the IN2P3 School of Statistics SOS 2012, Autrans, France, May 28–June 1, 2012, EPJ Web Conf. 55, 01002 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Heinrich and L. Lyons, “Systematic errors,” Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 57, 145–169 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Diehl, “Theory uncertainties,” in Data Analysis in High Energy Physics: A Practical Guide to Statistical Methods, Ed. by O. Behnke, K. Kröninger, Th. Schörner-Sadenius, and G. Schott (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2013), pp. 297–328.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Kamenshchikov.

Additional information

The article is published in the original.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kamenshchikov, A. A new model test in high energy physics in frequentist and Bayesian statistical formalisms. Phys. Part. Nuclei Lett. 14, 227–238 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1547477117010137

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1547477117010137

Navigation