Skip to main content
Log in

Extracellular proteases of mycelial fungi as participants of pathogenic process

  • Published:
Russian Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The interest in proteases secreted by mycelial fungi is due to several reasons of which one of the most important is their involvement in the initiation and development of the pathogenic process. A comparison of saprophytic and phytopathogenic mycelial fungi revealed one characteristic feature, namely, the appearance of a new trypsin-like activity in phytopathogens that is absent in saprophytes. To clear up the question of whether the degree of pathogenicity of a fungus is related to the activity of secreted trypsin-like protease, several species of Fusarium of various pathogenicity were compared. In two species, F. sporotrichioides (which causes ear fusariosis of rye) and F. heterosporum (the causative agent of root rot in wheat), a clear correlation between the activity and pathogenicity was revealed: the more pathogenetic F. sporotrichioides exhibited a higher extracellular trypsin-like activity than the less pathogenetic species F. heterosporum. Thus, the presence of trypsin-like activity in a saprotroph-pathogen pair may be an indicator of the pathogenicity of a fungus; in some cases, the value of this activity may indicate the degree of its pathogenicity. This suggests that trypsin-like proteases specific to phytopathogens are directly involved in the pathogenetic process, probably, through interaction with the “sentry” protein or the product of the resistance gene.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

SL and TL:

proteases, subtilisin-like and trypsinlike proteases

pNA:

para-nitroanilide

References

  1. Deshpande, M.V., World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 1992, vol. 8, pp. 242–250.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mosolov, V.V., Grigor’eva, L.I., and Valueva, T.A., Prikl. Biokhim. Mikrobiol., 2001, vol. 37, pp. 131–140.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Grudkowska, M. and Zagdanska, B., Acta Biochimica Polonica, 2004, vol. 51, pp. 609–624.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ohnishi, J., Ohnishi, E., Shibuya, H., and Takahashi, T., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 2005, vol. 1751, pp. 95–109.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pavlyukova, E.B., Belozerskii, M.A., and Dunaevskii, Ya.E., Biokhimiya (Moscow), 1998, vol. 63, pp. 1059–1089.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rao, M.B., Tanksale, A.M., Ghatge, M.S., and Deshpande, V.V., Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., 1998, vol. 62, pp. 597–635.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bidochka, M.J. and Melzer, M.J., Can. J. Microbiol., 2000, vol. 46, pp. 1138–1144.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chow, L.P., Liu, S.L., Yu, C.J., Liao, H.K., Tsai, J.J., and Tang, T.K., Biochem. J., 2000, vol. 346, pp. 423–431.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Blanco, J.L., Hontecillas, R., Bouza, E., Blanco, I., Pelaez, T., Munoz, P., Perez Molina, J., and Garcia, M.E., J. Clin. Microbiol., 2002, vol. 40, pp. 1811–1813.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dunaevskii, Ya.E., Gruban’, T.N., Belyakova, G.A., and Belozerskii, M.A., Biokhimiya (Moscow), 2000, vol. 65, pp. 848–853.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dunaevskii, Ya.E., Pavlyukova, E.B., Gruban’, T.N., Belyakova, G.A., and Belozerskii, M.A., Biokhimiya (Moscow), 1996, vol. 61, pp. 1904–1910.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gruban’, T.N., Extracellular Proteolytic Enzymes of Fungi Imperfecti. Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Takken, F.L.W. and Joosten, H.A.J., Eur. J. Plant Pathol., 2000, vol. 106, pp. 699–713.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. D’yakov, Yu.T., Zh. Obshch. Biol., 2005, vol. 66, pp. 451–458.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jia, Y., McAdams, S.A., Bryan, G.T., Hershey, H.P., and Valent, B., EMBO J., 2000, vol. 19, pp. 4004–4014.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mosolov, V.V. and Valueva, T.A., Biokhimiya (Moscow), 2006, vol. 71, pp. 1034–1042.

    Google Scholar 

  17. St. Leger, R., Cooper, R., and Charnley, A. J. Gen. Microbiol., 1986, vol. 132, pp. 1509–1517.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Thomas, S.R. and Elkinton, J.S., J. Invertebr. Pathol., 2004, vol. 85, pp. 146–151.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Erlanger, B.F., Kokowsky, N., and Cohen, W., Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 1961, vol. 95, pp. 271–278.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ya. E. Dunaevskii.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © Ya.E. Dunaevskii, A.R. Matveeva, G.N. Fatkhullina, G.A. Belyakova, T.M. Kolomiets, E.D. Kovalenko, M.A. Belozersky, 2008, published in Bioorganicheskaya Khimiya, 2008, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 317–321.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dunaevskii, Y.E., Matveeva, A.R., Fatkhullina, G.N. et al. Extracellular proteases of mycelial fungi as participants of pathogenic process. Russ J Bioorg Chem 34, 286–289 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1068162008030059

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1068162008030059

Key words

Navigation