Skip to main content
Log in

Quantifying Coarse Fragments in Soil Samples Using a Digital Camera

  • SOIL PHYSICS
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract—

We developed a novel method using image analysis to quantify the content and shape characteristics of coarse fragments in an Alfisol developed from loess over outwash. A total of 45 soil samples (about 600–1000 g each) were collected at 10-cm depth interval from 0 to 150-cm deep at three transects in the profile. The coarse fragments were separated from the soil fine-earth particles and photographed in the laboratory. The images were processed using ImageJ processing software that provides total count, total area, and mean circularity of each sample, as well as shape characteristics (circularity, aspect ratio, roundness, and solidity) of each coarse fragment. The amount of coarse fragments (coarse fragments, total count/mass, and total area/mass) varied with depth and was highest in the 2C1 and BC horizons where the soil was developed from coarse glacial outwash and a mixing of coarse outwash and loess. The coarse fragments content was lower in the loess and fine glacial outwash horizons. Approximately 9.6% of coarse fragments in weight or 14.5% by count moved from the glacial outwash layer into the loess layer (Ap and Bt horizons). The shape characteristics showed large variations at 50–110 cm depth where the soil was developed from coarse glacial outwash and a mixing of coarse outwash and loess. The mean circularity, roundness, and solidity of the coarse fragments at the topsoil were larger than those at the 50-110 cm, indicating that rounder stones tend to move faster than irregularly shaped stones during the frost heaving. This method provides a robust, fast and quantitative way to estimate the distribution and the shape characteristics of coarse fragments in a soil sample that can be applied to help better understand soil formation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. J. G. Bockheim and A. N. Gennadiyev, “The role of soil-forming processes in the definition of taxa in Soil Taxonomy and the World Soil Reference Base,” Geoderma 95, 53–72 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. D. Chantal, H. Rita, U. Bergsten, M. O. Lofvenius, and H. Grip, “Effect of soil properties and soil disturbance on frost heaving of mineral soil: a laboratory experiment,” Can. J. For. Res. 36, 2885–2893 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. S. W. Childs and A. L. Flint, “Physical properties of forest soils containing rock fragments,” in Proceedings of the 7th North American Forest Soils Conference “Sustained Productivity of Forest Soils,” Ed. by S. P. Gessel, D. S. Lacate, G. F. Weetman, and R. F. Powers (University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, 1990), pp. 95–121.

  4. T. L. Chow, H. W. Rees, J. O. Monteith, P. Toner, and J. Lavoie, “Effects of coarse fragment content on soil physical properties, soil erosion and potato production,” Can. J. Soil Sci. 87, 565–577 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. R. U. Cooke, A. Warren, and A. S. Goudie, Desert Geomorphology (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2006).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. H. Dunlop, MSc Thesis (Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA, 2006).

  7. W. J. Grant and R. A. Struchtemeyer, “Influence of the coarse fraction in two Maine potato soils on infiltration, runoff and erosion,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 23, 391–394 (1959).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A. E. Hartemink, A. N. Gennadiyev, J. G. Bockheim, and N. Bero, “Short-range variation in a Wisconsin soilscape (USA),” Eurasian Soil Sci. 50, 198–209 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. E. Hartemink and B. Minasny, “Towards digital soil morphometrics,” Geoderma 230, 305–317 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. H. Hlaváčiková, V. Novak, and J. Simunek, “The effects of rock fragment shapes and positions on modeled hydraulic conductivities of stony soils,” Geoderma 281, 39–48 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. F. D. Hole, “A classification of pedoturbations and some of other processes and factors of soil formation in relation to isotropism and anisotropism,” Soil Sci. 91, 375–377 (1961).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. C. Khetdan, N. Chittamart, S. Tawornpruek, T. Kongkaew, W. Onsamrarn, and S. Garre, “Influence of rock fragments on hydraulic properties of Ultisols in Ratchaburi Province, Thailand,” Geoderma Reg. 10, 21–28 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. C. A. M. King and J. T. Buckley, “The analysis of stone size and shape in arctic environments,” J. Sediment. Res. 38, 200–214 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. J. Lutz and R. F. Chandler, Forest Soils (Wiley, New York, 1946).

    Google Scholar 

  15. F. Miller and R. Guthrie, “Classification and distribution of soils containing rock fragments in the United States,” in Erosion and Productivity of Soils Containing Rock Fragments, SSSA Special Publication 13 (Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, 1984), pp. 1–6.

  16. T. K. O’Donnell, K. W. Goyne, R. J. Miles, C. Baffaut, S. H. Anderson, and K. A. Sudduth, “Identification and quantification of soil redoximorphic features by digital image processing,” Geoderma 157, 86–96 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. E. Perfect, R. D. Miller, and B. Burton, “Frost upheaval of overwintering plants: a quantitative field study of the displacement process,” Arct. Alp. Res. 20, 70–75 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. F. J. Pettijohn and A. C. Lundahl, “Shape and roundness of Lake Erie beach sands,” J. Sediment. Res. 13, 69–78 (1943).

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Poesen and H. Lavee, “Rock fragments in top soils: significance and processes,” Catena 23, 1–28 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. M. C. Powers, “A new roundness scale for sedimentary particles,” J. Sediment. Res. 23, 117–119 (1953).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. K. Pye, “The nature, origin and accumulation of loess,” Quat. Sci. Rev. 14, 653–667 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. W. Rasband, ImageJ (US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  23. R.-M. Rytter, “Stone and gravel contents of arable soils influence estimates of C and N stocks,” Catena 95, 153–159 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. P. J. Schoeneberger, D. A. Wysocki, and E. C. Benham, Field Book for Describing and Sampling Soils, Version 3.0 (United States Department of Agriculture, National Soil Survey Center, Lincoln, NE, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  25. C. F. Shaw, “Erosion pavement,” Geogr. Rev. 19, 638–641 (1929).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. W. She, X. Cao, G. Zhao, D. Cai, J. Jiang, and X. Hu, “Experimental and numerical investigation of the effect of soil type and fineness on soil frost heave behavior,” Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 148, 148–158 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Soil Science Division Staff, Soil Survey Manual: USDA Handbook 18, Ed. by C. Ditzler, K. Scheffe, and H.C. Monger (Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 2017).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Soil Survey Staff, Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 12th ed. (United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, 2014).

  29. V. I. Stewart, W. A. Adams, and H. H. Abdulla, “Quantitative pedological studies on soils derived from Silurian mudstones II. The relationship between stone content and the apparent density of the fine earth,” J. Soil Sci. 21, 248–255 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. S. Taber, “Frost heaving,” J. Geol. 37, 428-461 (1929).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Q.-B. Wang, A. E. Hartemink, Z.-D. Jiang, N.-X. Jin, and Z.-X. Sun, “Digital soil morphometrics of krotovinas in a deep Alfisol derived from loess in Shenyang, China,” Geoderma 301, 11–18 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. X. Wang, Z. Li, C. Cai, Z. Shi, Q. Xu, Z. Fu, and Z. Guo, “Effects of rock fragment cover on hydrological response and soil loss from Regosols in a semi-humid environment in South-West China,” Geomorphology 151–152, 234–242 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. X. Wang, G. Liu, and S. Liu, “Effects of gravel on grassland soil carbon and nitrogen in the arid regions of the Tibetan Plateau,” Geoderma 166, 181–188 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Z. Wang, W. A. Jury, A. Tuli, and D.-J. Kim, “Unstable flow during redistribution,” Vadose Zone J. 3, 549–559 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  35. R. Webster, “Quantitative spatial analysis of soil in the field”, in Advances in Soil Science (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1985), pp. 1–70.

    Google Scholar 

  36. R. R. Weil and N. C. Brady, The Nature and Properties of Soils, 15th ed. (Pearson Press, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  37. M. J. Zdilla, S. A. Hatfield, K. A. McLean, L. M. Cyrus, J. M. Laslo, and H. W. Lambert, “Circularity, solidity, axes of a best fit ellipse, aspect ratio, and roundness of the foramen ovale: a morphometric analysis with neurosurgical considerations,” J. Craniofacial Surg. 27, 222–228 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We would like to thank Dr. Yin Zhou for her assistance in the sample collection, and Richard Lee and Marina Steiner for their help in the sample preparation and image analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. E. Hartemink.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Hartemink, A.E. & Huang, J. Quantifying Coarse Fragments in Soil Samples Using a Digital Camera. Eurasian Soil Sc. 52, 954–962 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229319080179

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229319080179

Keywords:

Navigation