Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Satellite assessment of dehumification of arable soils in Saratov region

  • Degradation, Rehabilitation, and Conservation of Soils
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Possibilities of using satellite data for the evaluation of soil degradation processes on arable lands in Saratov region were analyzed. A regression model describing the relationships between the humus content in the upper layer of arable soils and their spectral reflectance was developed and applied to assess dehumification in the studied region on the basis of Landsat TM5 images. It was found that the humus content on 36.3% of test fields decreased by 1–2% in the period from 1988 to 2011. On the slopes with slightly eroded soils, the humus content decreased by 1.4–1.6% (in some cases, up to 2.5%); on the slopes with moderately eroded soils, by 1.8–2.0% (up to 2.8%). During the considered period, the area of slightly eroded soils increased by almost two times, and the area of moderately eroded soils increased by nearly three times. The most pronounced reduction in the humus content took place in the soils developed from sands, loamy sands, and sandy loams. An increase in the humus content was identified on the lower parts of the slopes (13.44% of test area), where the accumulation of the high-humus soil material eroded from the upper parts of the slopes could take place.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. L. Andronikov, T. V. Afanas’eva, and M. S. Simakova, “Interpretation of the soil cover in major natural zones on the basis of aerial and satellite images for mapping purposes,” in Aerial and Satellite Methods in Soil Science and Their Use in Agriculture (Nauka, Moscow, 1990), pp. 22–34.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. B. Achasov and D. I. Bidolakh, “The use of space and ground digital photography for determining the humus content in soils,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 41(3), 249–254 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. N. N. Bobrovitskaya, Methodological Recommendations on the Application of Aerial Images for the Study and Calculation of Soil Water Erosion Characteristics (Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 1986) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  4. A Report on the State of the Environment and Environmental Protection in Saratov Oblast in 2007 (Saratov, 2008) [in Russian].

  5. I. E. Egorov, “Field methods to study soil erosion,” Vestn. Udmurt. Univ., Biol. Nauki Zemle, No. 1, (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. N. Zaslavskii, Soil Erosion (Vysshaya Shkola, Moscow, 1983) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  7. V. I. Kravtsova, Satellite-Based Methods of Soil Studies (Aspekt Press, Moscow, 2005) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. N. Mar’in, Agricultural Lands of Stavropol Region: Monitoring, Degradation, and Protection (Kolos, Moscow, 2010) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  9. Handbook on Identification of Degraded and Polluted Lands (Minesterstvo Sel’sk. Khoz. Ross. Federatsii, Moscow, 1995) [in Russian].

  10. G. V. Motuzova and O. S. Bezuglova, Ecological Monitoring of Soils (Akademicheskii Prospekt, Moscow, 2007) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. S. Orlov, Spectral Reflectance of Soils and Their Components (Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 2001) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. G. Reshetov, Degraded Soils of Saratov Oblast (Saratov, 2008) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. N. Romanov, “Remote assessment of the degree of soil degradation from radiation properties of soils,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 42(3), 326–333 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Modern Agricultural Land Use in Russia: Status, Problems, and Prospects. EuropeAID TACIS Russia Action Program. Land Property Policy Reform II Project, EuropeAid/120673/C/SV/RU (Moscow, 2007).

  15. N. P. Sorokina, “Quantitative assessment of color of ordinary chernozem,” Byul. Pochv. Inst. im. V.V. Dokuchaeva, No. 1, 116–124 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  16. N. P. Sorokina and B. M. Kogut, “The dynamics of humus content in arable chernozems and approaches to its study,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 30(2), 146–151 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Theoretical and Methodological Principles of Prevention of Agricultural Soil (Land) Degradation. Collective Monograph (Pochven. Inst. im. V.V. Dokuchaeva, Moscow, 2013), Vol. 1 [in Russian].

  18. F. Bastida, J. L. Moreno, T. Hernandez, and C. Garcia, “Microbiological degradation index of soils in a semiarid climate,” Soil Chem. Biochem., No. 38, (2006). doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.06.001

    Google Scholar 

  19. H. Belinaso, J. A. M. Demattê, and S. A. Remerio, “Soil spectral library and its use in soil classification,” R. Bras. Ci. Solo., No. 34, 861–870 (2010). doi: 10.1590/S0100-06832010000300027

    Google Scholar 

  20. D. J. Brown, K. D. Shepherd, M. G. Walsh, M. D. Mays, and T. G. Reinsch, “Global soil characterization with VNIR diffuse reflectance spectroscopy,” Geoderma, No. 132, 273–290 (2006). doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.04.025

    Google Scholar 

  21. T. L. Coleman, P. A. Agbu, and O. L. Montgomery, “Spectral differentiation on surface soils and soil properties: is it possible from space platforms?” Soil Sci. 155(4), 283–293 (1993). doi: 10.1097/00010694199304000-00007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. A. Gomez Jose, S. Alvarez, and M.-A. Soriano, “Development of a soil degradation assessment tool for organic olive groves in southern Spain,” Catena 79, 9–17 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2009.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. R. B. Kheir, O. Cerdan, and C. Abdallah, “Regional soil erosion risk mapping in Lebanon,” Geomorphology 2(3–4), 347–359 (2006). doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.05.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. D. Lu, G. Li, G. S. Valladares, and M. Batistella, “Mapping soil erosion risk in Rondonia, Brazilian Amazonia: using RUSLE, remote sensing and GIS,” Land Degrad. Dev., No. 15, 499–512 (2004). doi: 10.1002/ldr.634

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. F. Moncrief, P. P. Sharma, J. J. Xia, and S. C. Gupta, “Cropping system effects on snowmelt losses of solids and associated organic carbon,” Soil Tillage Res. 81(2), 195–204 (2005). doi: 10.1016/j.still.2004.09.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. L. R. Oldeman, R. T. A. Hakkeling, and W. G. Sombrock, “Global assessment of soil degradation,” in The World Map of the Status of Human-induced Soil Degradation: An Explanatory Note (International Soil Reference and Information Centre, Wageningen, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  27. K. G. Renard, G. R. Foster, G. A. Weessies, D. K. McCool, and D. C. Yoder, Predicting Soil Erosion by Water: A Guide to Conservation Planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE), Handbook No. 703 (US Department of Agriculture, Washington DC, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  28. J. W. Rouse, R. H. Haas, J. A. Schell, and D. W. Deering, “Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS,” in Third Earth Resources Technology Satellite Symposium (NASA, 1973), pp. 309–317.

    Google Scholar 

  29. A. K. Sinha, “Spectral reflectance characteristics of soil and its correlation with soil properties and surface conditions,” J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 14(1), 1–9 (1986). doi: 10.1007/BF03007217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. G. Wang, G. Gertner, S. Fang, and A. B. Anderson, “Mapping multiple variables for predicting soil loss by geostatistical methods with TM images and a slope map,” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., No. 69, 889–898 (2003). doi: 0099-1112/03/6908-889$3.00/0

    Google Scholar 

  31. World Reference Base for Soil Resources, World Soil Resources Reports No. 106 (Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, 2014).

  32. Q. Wu and M. Wang, “A framework for risk assessment on soil erosion by water using an integrated and systematic approach,” J. Hydrol. 337, 11–21 (2007). doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.01.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. J. Xiao, “Detection of land desertification and topsoil grain size using remote sensing,” in Proceedings of the Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IGARSS’05 (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2005), Vol. 1, p. 4. doi: 10.1109/IGARSS.2005.1526141

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute, per. Pyzhevskii 7, Moscow, 119017, Russia

    E. Yu. Prudnikova & I. Yu. Savin

  2. Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, ul. Miklukho-Maklaya 8/2, Moscow, 119817, Russia

    I. Yu. Savin

Authors
  1. E. Yu. Prudnikova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. I. Yu. Savin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Yu. Prudnikova.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © E.Yu. Prudnikova, I.Yu. Savin, 2015, published in Pochvovedenie, 2015, No. 5, pp. 597–604.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prudnikova, E.Y., Savin, I.Y. Satellite assessment of dehumification of arable soils in Saratov region. Eurasian Soil Sc. 48, 533–539 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229315050075

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229315050075

Keywords

Search

Navigation