Skip to main content
Log in

Criteria and methods to assess the ecological status of soils in relation to the landscaping of urban territories

  • Degradation, Rehabilitation, and Conservation of Soils
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ecological status and functioning of soils in urban ecosystems are considered. A series of criteria and simple methods of their determination are suggested to assess soil suitability for landscaping purposes. Their practical application is shown by the example of the ecological assessment and monitoring survey of different urban territories in the southwestern, western, and northwestern administrative districts of Moscow and in Moscow suburbs. It is shown that the main damage to the soils of actively used territories in Moscow is due to the artificial salinization induced by the application of deicing substances and fertilizers. The second factor of soil degradation is the soil compaction. An unfavorable water and air regime (a deficit or excess of soil moisture) is a factor that manifests itself sporadically in time (during the extremely dry years) and in space (at the sites with an increased soil compaction and soil water evaporation). A considerable decrease in the potential biological activity of urban soils, including the soils of newly built residential areas, in comparison with their natural analogues attests to the disturbance of their functioning under the impact of chemical pollution and an unfavorable physical status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. G. Bondarev, “Theoretical Principles and Practice of Optimizing Physical Conditions and Fertility of Soils,” Pochvovedenie, No. 11, 35–42 (1994).

  2. A. F. Vadyunina and Z. A. Korchagina, Methods of Studying the Physical Properties of Soils and Sediments (Vysshaya Shkola, Moscow, 1973) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. A. Vorob’eva, Chemical Analysis of Soils (Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 1998) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. D. Voronin, Structural-Functional Hydrophysics of Soils (Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 1984) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. I. Gerasimova, M. N. Stroganova, N. V. Mozharova, and T. V. Prokof’eva, Anthropogenic Soils (Oikumena, Moscow, 2003) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. R. Zaidel’man, For Farmers and Gardeners (Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 2001) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  7. Methodological Guidelines for Assessing Urban Soils in the Development of Urban Design and Architectural Construction Documents (NIiPIEG, Moscow, 1996) [in Russian].

  8. V. G. Mineev, Agricultural Chemistry (Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 1990) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  9. Evaluation of Soils and Sediments in Engineering-Ecological Surveys for Construction Purposes (NIiPIEG, Moscow, 2001) [in Russian].

  10. Field and Laboratory Methods of Studying the Physical Properties and Regimes of Soils (Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 2001) [in Russian].

  11. Moscow Government Resolution No. 623-PP “On the Approval of Rules for the Creation, Maintenance, and Conservation of Green Plantations” and No. 743-PP “On the Approval of Norms and Rules for the Design of Public Services and Amenities in Moscow” (Konsul’tant Plyus, Moscow, 2002) [in Russian].

  12. E. Pfaiffer, Soil Fertility and Its Sustenance and Renewal (Dukhovnoe Poznanie, Kaluga, 1994) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yu. I. Rydkin, Soil-Reclamation Survey, Map Compilation, and Substantiation of a Reclamation Project (Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 1993) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. V. Smagin, Soil Gas Phase (Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 2005) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. V. Smagin, “Theory and Methods of Evaluating the Physical Status of Soils,” Pochvovedenie, No. 3, 328–341 (2003) [Eur. Soil Sci. 36 (3), 3102–312 (2003)].

  16. A. V. Smagin, N. B. Sadovnikova, D. D. Khaidapova, and E. M. Shevchenko, Ecological Assessment of the Biophysical Status of Soils (Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 1999) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. V. Smagin, A. K. Guber, E. V. Shein, and Gaiz Munir, “Development of Soil Constructions and Irrigation Regimes of Planted Urban Landscapes under Arid Climatic Conditions”, in Degradation and Desertification of Soils (Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 1999), pp. 470–482 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. V. Smagin, N. B. Sadovnikova, M. V. Smagina, et al., Simulation of Soil Organic Matter Dynamics (Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 2001) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. N. Stroganova, A. D. Myagkova, and T. V. Prokof’eva, “Urban Soils: Genesis, Classification, and Functions,” in Soil, City, and Ecology (Moscow, 1997), pp. 15–85 [in Russian].

  20. I. I. Sudnitsyn, Ecological Hydrophysics of Soils (Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 1995) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  21. Soil Physical Conditions and Plant Growth (Inostranaya Literatura, Moscow, 1955) [in Russian].

  22. J. Harte, C. Holden, R. Schneider, and C. Shirely, “Toxics A to Z”—a Guide to Every Day Pollution Hazards“ (Univ. Calif. Press, Berkley, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. Letey, “Relationship between Soil Physical Properties and Crop Production,” in Advances in Soil Science (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1985), pp. 277–294.

    Google Scholar 

  24. E. V. Maas and G. J. Hoffman, “Crop-Salt Tolerance Evaluation of Existing Data,” J. Irrig. Drain. Div. 103, 115–134 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.V. Smagin, N.A. Azovtseva, M.V. Smagina, A.L. Stepanov, A.D. Myagkova, A.S. Kurbatova, 2006, published in Pochvovedenie, 2006, No. 5, pp. 603–615.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smagin, A.V., Azovtseva, N.A., Smagina, M.V. et al. Criteria and methods to assess the ecological status of soils in relation to the landscaping of urban territories. Eurasian Soil Sc. 39, 539–551 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229306050115

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229306050115

Keywords

Navigation