Skip to main content
Log in

Methods of analysis of geophysical data during increased solar activity

  • Applied Problems
  • Published:
Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work is directed at creation of methods of study of the processes in the ionospheric–magnetospheric system during increased solar and geomagnetic activity. Method of modeling and analysis of the parameters of the ionosphere, which allows prediction of the data and identification of the anomalies during the ionospheric disturbances, are given. Computational solutions for determination and estimation of the geomagnetic disturbances are described. Method of determination of the anomalous changes in the time course of cosmic rays, which allows qualitative estimations of the moments of their origination, duration, and intensity, is suggested.

On the basis of the methods elaborated, the data on the periods of strong and moderate magnetic storms are complexly analyzed. Sharp oscillations in the electron density of the ionosphere with positive and negative phases, which originate in the regions analyzed during an increase in geomagnetic activity, are distinguished. Positive phases of the ionospheric disturbances from several hours to one and a half days long were formed before the beginning of the magnetic storms. At the moments of the increase in the electron concentration, a local increase is observed in the level of cosmic rays (several hours before the magnetic storms) that supported the solar nature of these effects. During the strongest geomagnetic disturbances, the electron concentration in the ionosphere decreased significantly and led to prolonged negative phases of ionospheric storms, which coincided with the decrease in the level of cosmic rays (a Forbush decrease).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. L. Afraimovich, E. A. Kosogorov, K. S. Palamarchouk, N. P. Perevalova, and A. V. Plotnikov, “The use of GPS arrays in detecting the ionospheric response during rocket launchings,” Earth, Planets Space 52 (11) 1061–1066 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Nakamura, T. Maruyama, and Y. Shidama, “Using a neural network to make operational forecasts of ionospheric variations and storms at Kokubunji, Japan,” J. Nat. Inst. Inf. Commun. Technol. 56, 391–474 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. Kato, Y. Takiguchi, D. Fukayama, Y. Shimizu, T. Maruyama, and M. Ishii, “Development of automatic scaling software of ionospheric parameters,” J. Nat. Inst. Inf. Commun. Technol. 56, 465–406 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. Watthanasangmechai, P. Supnithi, S. Lerkvaranyu, T. Tsugawa, T. Nagatsuma, and T. Maruyama, “TEC prediction with neural network for equatorial latitude station in Thailand,” Earth, Planets Space 64, 473–483 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. D. Bilitza and B. W. Reinisc, “International reference ioinosphere 2007: improvements and new parameters,” Adv. Space Res. 42, 599–609 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S. I. Akasofu and S. Chapman, Solar-Terrestrial Physics (Univ. Press, Oxford, 1972), p. 901.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. R. P. Nayar, V. N. Radhika, and P. T. Seena, “Investigation of substorms during geomagnetic storms using wavelet techniques,” in Proc. ILWS Workshop (Goa, Feb. 19–24, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  8. N. M. Rotanova, T. N. Bondar’, and V. V. Ivanov, “Wavelet-analysis of secular geomagnetic variations,” Geomagn. Aeron., No. 2, 276–282 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. G. Hafez, E. Ghamry, H. Yayama, and K. Yumoto, “Systematic examination of the geomagnetic storm sudden commencement using multi resolution analysis,” Adv. Space Res., No. 51, 39–49 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Z. Xu, et al., “An assessment study of the wavelet-based index of magnetic storm activity (WISA) and its comparison to the Dst index,” J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., No. 70, 1579–1588 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Jach, P. Kokoszka, J. Sojka, and L. Zhu, “Waveletbased index of magnetic storm activity,” J. Geophys. Res. 111, A09215 (2006). doi:10.1029/2006ja011635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. N. Zaourar, M. Hamoudi, M. Mandea, G. Balasis, and M. Holschneider, “Wavelet-based multiscale analysis of geomagnetic disturbance,” Earth, Planets Space 65 12, 1525–1540 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. O. V. Mandrikova and I. S. Solov’ev, “Wavelet technology for processing and analyzing the Earth’s magnetic field variations,” Inf. Tekhnol., No. 1, 34–38 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  14. O. V. Mandrikova and I. S. Solovev, “The method of the extracting disturbance and estimates of the Earth’s magnetic field is based on the wavelet-packet,” in Proc. 11th Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis (Samara, Sept. 23–28, 2013), pp. 646–648.

    Google Scholar 

  15. O. V. Mandrikova, I. S. Solovjev, V. V. Geppener, D. M. Klionskiy, and R. T. Al-Kasasbeh, “Analysis of the Earth’s magnetic field variations on the basis of a wavelet-based approach,” Digit Signal Processing 23, 329–339 (2013).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. O. V. Mandrikova, I. S. Solovev, and T. L. Zalyaev, “Methods of analysis of geomagnetic field variations and cosmic ray data,” Earth, Planets Space 66 (1) (2014). doi:10.1186/s40623-014-0148-0

  17. O. V. Mandrikova, V. V. Bogdanov, and I. S. Solov’ev, “Wavelet analysis of geomagnetic field data,” Geomagn. Aeron. 53 2, 268–273 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. O. V. Mandrikova, N. V. Glushkova, and I. V. Zhivet’ev, “Modeling and analysis of ionospheric parameters by a combination of wavelet transform and autoregression models,” Geomagn. Aeron. 54 5, 638–645 (2014). DOI: 10.7868/S0016794014050101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. S. Marple, Digital Spectral Analysis with Applications (Prentice-Hall, New-Jersey, 1987), p. 492.

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. Pervak, V. Choliy, and V. Taradiy, “Spectral analysis of the ionospheric irregularities from GPS observations,” in Proc. 17th Annu. Conf. of Doctoral Students–WDS 2008, Part II Physics of Plasmas and Ionized Media (Prague, 2008), pp. 189–191.

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. V. Klimenko, “Numerical modeling of the global ionospheric effects of storm sequence on September 9–14, 2005—comparison with IRI model,” Earth, Planets Space 64 6, 433–440 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. D. Bilitza and B. W. Reinisch, “International reference ionosphere 2007: improvements and new parameters,” Adv. Space Res. 42, 599–609 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. M. Hamoudi, N. Zaourar, R. Mebarki, L. Briqueu, and M. Parrot, “Wavelet analysis of ionospheric disturbances,” in Proc. EGU General Assembly. Geophys. Res. Abstr. (Vienna, 2009), p. 8523.

    Google Scholar 

  24. O. Akyilmaz, H. Kutterer, C. K. Shum, and T. Ayan, “Fuzzy-wavelet based prediction of Earth rotation parameters,” Appl. Soft Comput. 11 1, 837–841 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. L. He, L. Wu, S. Liu, and B. Ma, “Seismo-ionospheric anomalies detection based on integrated wavelet,” in Proc. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) (Vancouver, 2011), pp. 1834–1837. doi:10.1109/IGARSS.2011.6049479

    Google Scholar 

  26. E. Ghamry, A. Hafez, K. Yumoto, and H. Yayama, “Effect of SC on frequency content of geomagnetic data using DWT application: SC automatic detection,” Earth, Planets Space 65, 1007–1015 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. O. V. Mandrikova, Yu. A. Polozov, V. V. Bogdanov, and E. A. Zhizhikina, “Method of detection of abnormal features in ionosphere critical frequency data on the basis of wavelet transformation and neural networks combination,” J. Software Eng. Appl. 5 (12B), 181–187 (2012). doi:10.4236/jsea.2012.512b035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Z. Yu, “Modeling and simulation of the horizontal component of the geomagnetic field by fractional stochastic differential equations in conjunction with empirical mode decomposition,” J. Geophys. Res. 115 (A10) (2010). DOI:10.1029/2009JA015206.

  29. D. M. Klionsky, N. I. Oreshko, and V. V. Geppener, “Applications of empirical mode decomposition for processing nonstationary signals,” Pattern Recogn. Image Anal. 13 3, 390–399 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. D. M. Klionsky, N. I. Oreshko, and V. V. Geppener, “Empirical mode decomposition in segmentation and clustering of slowly and fast changing non-stationary signals,” Pattern Recogn. Image Anal. 19 1, 14–29 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. N. E. Huang and Z. Wu, “A review on Hilbert-Huang transform: method and its applications to geophysical studies,” Rev. Geophys. 46 (2) (2008). doi:10.1029/2007RG000228

  32. O. V. Mandrikova, N. V. Fetisova, Y. A. Polozov, I. S. Solovev, and M. S. Kupriyanov, “Method for modeling of the components of ionospheric parameter time variations and detection of anomalies in the ionosphere,” Earth, Planets Space 67, 131 (2015). DOIi: 10.1186/s40623-015-0301-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. O. V. Mandrikova, N. V. Glushkova, and Yu. A. Polozov, “Simulation and analysis of time variations in ionospheric parameters on the basis of wavelet transform and multicomponent models,” Pattern Recogn. Image Anal. 25 3, 470–480 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. O. V. Mandrikova, N. V. Glushkova, and Yu. A. Polozov, “Algorithms for separating and analyzing anomalies in critical frequency parameters of fOF2 ionosphere by superposing wavelet-transformations and autoregressive models,” Tsifr. Obrab. Signalov, No. 1, 47–53 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  35. I. N. Toptygin, Space Rays in Interplanetary Magnetic Fields (Nauka, Moscow, 1983) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  36. O. V. Mandrikova and T. L. Zalyaev, “The way to simulate the space rays variations by superposing the multiple-scale wavelet-decomposition and neural networks of variable structure,” Tsifr. Obrab. Signalov, No. 1, 11–16 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  37. O. V. Mandrikova and T. L. Zalyaev, “The way to simulate space rays variations and the way to choose anomalies by superposing the wavelet-transformation and neural networks,” Mashin. Obuch. Analiz Dannykh 1 9, 1154–1167 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  38. J. Kóta and A. Somogyi, “Some problems of investigating periodicities of cosmic rays,” Acta Phys. Acad. Sci. Hungaricae 27, 523–548 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. P. Paschalis, C. Sarlanis, and H. Mavromichalaki, “Artificial neural network approach of cosmic ray primary data processing,” Solar Phys. 182 1, 303–318 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. A. Vecchio, M. Laurenza, M. Storini, and V. Carbone, “New insights on cosmic ray modulation through a joint use of nonstationary data-processing methods,” Adv. Astron. 2012, Art ID 834247 (2012). doi:10.1155/2012/834247

  41. V. I. Kozlov and V. V. Markov, “Wavelet-image of heliosphere storm in space rays,” Geomagn. Aeron., No. 1, 56–65 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  42. V. I. Kozlov and V. V. Kozlov, “New index of solar activity is a scintillation index of space rays,” Geomagn. Aeron. 48 4, 1–9 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. V. I. Kozlov, “The way to estimate scaling properties of space rays fluctuation dynamics in the cycle of solar activity,” Geomagn. Aeron. 39 1, 100–104 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  44. V. I. Kozlov and V. V. Markov, “Wavlet-image of thin structure of 11-year cycle according to space rays fluctuation research in 20-23 cycles,” Geomagn. Aeron. 47 1, 47–55 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  45. N. Zarrouk and R. Bennaceur, “Neural network and wavelets in prediction of cosmic ray variability: the North Africa as study case, science direct,” Acta Astron. 66, 1008–1016 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. R. Bellotti, “Antimatter search in cosmic rays by neural networks,” Proc. SPIE 3077, Appl. Sci. Artificial Neural Networks III 169 (Apr. 4, 1997). doi:10.1117/12.271542

    Google Scholar 

  47. S. Mallat, A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing (Acad. Press, London, 1999), p. 637.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. I. Daubechies, “Ten lectures on wavelets,” CBMSNSF Lecture Notes nr. 61 (SIAM, 1992), p. 377.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. S. Jaffard, “Pointwise smoothness, two-microlocalization and wavelet coefficients,” Publ. Mat. 35, 155–168 (1991).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. B. R. Levin, Theoretical Basis of Statistical Radio Engineering (Sovetskoe Radio, Moscow, 1975) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  51. D. Buresova and J. Laštovika, “Pre-storm enhancements of foF2 above,” Adv. Space Res. 39, 1298–1303 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. L. Liu, W. Wan, M.-L. Zhang, and B. Zhao, “Case study on total electron content enhancements at low latitudes during low geomagnetic activities before the storms,” Ann. Geophys. 26 4, 893–903 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. L. Liu, W. Wan, M.-L. Zhang, B. Zhao, and B. Ning, “Prestorm enhancements in NmF2 and total electron content at low latitudes,” J. Geophys. Res. 113, 1–12 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  54. P. A. B. Nogueira, M. A. Abdu, and I. S. Batista, “Equatorial ionization anomaly and thermospheric meridional winds during two major storms over Brazilian low latitudes,” J. Atmos. Solar-Terrestrial Phys. 73, 1535–1543 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. A. D. Danilov, “Ionospheric F-region response to geomagnetic disturbances,” Adv. Space Res. 52 3, 343–366 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. B. J. Adekoya and V. U. Chukwuma, “The effects of geomagnetic storm on middle latitude ionospheric F2 variations during storm of April (2–6), 2004,” Indian J. Radio Space Phys. 41 6, 606–616 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. V. Mandrikova.

Additional information

Oksana Viktorovna Mandrikova, born 1972. Graduated from Shevchenko Kiev State University, 1995. Received doctoral degree in 2009, Doctor of Technical Sciences. Head of Laboratory of System Analysis at the Institute of Cosmophysical Research and Radio Wave Propagation, Far East Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, and Professor in the Department of Monitoring Systems, Kamchatka State Technical University. Scientific interests: Intellectual methods of analysis of geophysical data, wavelets, neuron networks, the ionosphere, the magnetosphere, cosmic weather.

More than 100 publications. Member of the Editorial Board of the journal Vestnik of Kamchatka State Technical University, member of the National Committee for Pattern Recognition and Image analysis, member of the international organization Asia Oceania Geosciences Society. Awarded a grant of the President of the Russian Federation for young doctors of sciences no. MD-2199.2011.9.

Yurii Aleksandrovich Polozov, born 1983. Graduated from Kamchatka State Technical University, 2005. Received candidate’s degree in 2011, Candidate of Technical Sciences. Senior researcher, Laboratory of System Analysis, Institute of Cosmophysical Research and Radio Wave Propagation, Far East Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, and Docent, Department of Systems of Monitoring, Kamchatka State Technical University. Scientific interests: Analysis of complex signals, wavelets, neuron networks, ionospheric networks, ionospheric processes, anomalous features of signals. 17 publications. Received a grant of the Federal Program UMNIK, 2011, and a grant of the President of the Russian Federation (SP-2976.2013.5).

Igor Sergeevich Solovev, born 1986. Graduated from Kamchatka State Technical University, 2008, Received candidate’s degree in 2013, Candidate of Technical Sciences. Senior researcher, Laboratory of System Analysis, Institute of Cosmophysical Research and Radio Wave Propagation, Far East Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, and Docent, Department of Systems of Monitoring, Kamchatka State Technical University. Scientific interests: Digital processing of data, wavelet transform, magnetic field of the Earth, magnetic storms. 46 publications. Received a grant of the Federal Program UMNIK, 2011.

Nadezhda Vladimirovna Fetisova, born 1987. Graduated from Kamchatka State Technical University, 2009. Junior researcher, Laboratory of System Analysis, Institute of Cosmophysical Research and Radio Wave Propagation, Far East Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences. Scientific interests: Analysis of complex signals, wavelets, models of autoregressive integrated moving average, ionospheric processes, anomalous features of signals. 18 publications.

Mikhail Stepanovich Kupriyanov, born 1951. Graduated from Omsk Polytechnical Insitute, 1975, and received doctoral degree in 1991, Doctor of Technical Sciences. Head of the Department of Computer Techniques, Ul’yanov (Lenin) St. Petersburg Electrotechnical University (LETI). Scientific interests: Theory and practical implementation of computer technologies and computer systems, intellectual methods and methods of supporting of high work capacity of information systems, distributed systems and technologies, microprocessing technologies, digital processing of signals, intellectual technologies. More than 100 publications. Received award Honored Worker of Higher Schools of Russian Federation and Laureate of Award of the Government of Russian Federation in the area of education.

Timur Lenarovich Zalyaev, born 1989. Graduated from Kamchatka State Technical University, 2011. Junior researcher, Laboratory of System Analysis, Institute of Cosmophysical Research and Radio Wave Propagation, Far East Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences. Scientific interests: Digital processing of data, wavelet tranform, cosmic rays, Forbush effects. 21 publications. Received a grant of the Federal Program UMNIK, 2013.

Aleksei Vladimirovich Dmitriev, born 1968. Graduated from Moscow State University, 1993, Received candidate’s degree in 1996, Candidate of Mathematical and Physical Sciences. Project-appointed research fellow, National Central University, Graduate Institute of Space Science Taiwan, Taoyuan City. Scientific interests: Plasma, plasma physics, space technologies. More than 140 publications. Member of the American Geophysical Union, member of editorial board of the journal of Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mandrikova, O.V., Polozov, Y.A., Solovev, I.S. et al. Methods of analysis of geophysical data during increased solar activity. Pattern Recognit. Image Anal. 26, 406–418 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1054661816020103

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1054661816020103

Keywords

Navigation