Skip to main content
Log in

Metallogenic specialization of supercontinent cycles: A case study of silver deposits

  • Geology
  • Published:
Doklady Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The distribution of integrated resources of large and superlarge mineral deposits (LSLDs) of silver, where the main part of industrially recoverable silver reserves is concentrated, is compared with the existing model of supercontinent cyclicity over the geological history of the Earth. It is found that each supercontinent cycle (Kenoran, Columbian, Rodinian, Pangean, and Amasian) is particularly expressed in the silver metallogeny. The significant intercycle variations in the numbers of LSLDs, diversity of types of these deposits, accumulated resources, mean tenors of silver in ores, and some other numerically expressible characteristics are revealed. These variations correlate with a number of geohistorical changes in the conditions under which endogenous and exogenous geological processes run.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. V. Tkachev and D. V. Rundqvist, Geol. Ore Deposits 58 (4), 263–283 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A. V. Tkachev, S. V. Bulov, D. V. Rundkvist, et al., Geoinformatika, No. 1, 47–59 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. M. Konstantinov, A. V. Kostin, and A. A. Sidorov, Geology of Silver Deposits (Sakhapoligrafizdat, Yakutsk, 2003) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. E. Antonov, Foreign Silver Deposits (GEOS, Moscow, 2009) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mineral Raw Materials: from Depths to Market, Vol. 1: Noble Metals and Diamonds, Ed. by A. P. Stavskii (Nauchnyi Mir, Moscow, 2011) [in Russian].

  6. D. L. Huston, S.-S. Sun, R. Blewett, et al., Econ. Geol. 97, 733–756 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. F. Eaton, R. E. Criss, R. J. Fleck, et al., Econ. Geol. 90, 2274–2286 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. P. E. Rosenberg and P. B. Larson, Econ. Geol. 95, 1689–1699 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. Panneerselvam, A. W. Macfarlane, and V. J. M. Salters, Econ. Geol. 101, 1063–1077 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. D. E. Canfield, Nature 396, 450–453 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S. B. Bodon, Econ. Geol. 93, 1463–1488 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D. L. Leach, D. C. Bradley, D. Huston, et al., Econ. Geol. 105, 593–625 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. D. D. Marshall and D. H. Watkinson, Explor. Min. Geol. 9, 81–90 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Oszczepalski, Miner. Deposita 34, 599–613 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A. L. Dergachev and N. I. Eremin, Moscow Univ. Geol. Bull. 63 (4), 237–246 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. V. Tkachev.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.V. Tkachev, D.V. Rundqvist, N.A. Vishnevskaya, 2017, published in Doklady Akademii Nauk, 2017, Vol. 475, No. 3, pp. 299–305.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tkachev, A.V., Rundqvist, D.V. & Vishnevskaya, N.A. Metallogenic specialization of supercontinent cycles: A case study of silver deposits. Dokl. Earth Sc. 475, 766–770 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X17070285

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X17070285

Navigation