Skip to main content
Log in

Responses of Aquatic Organisms to Cyanobacteria and Elodea in Microcosms

  • GENERAL BIOLOGY
  • Published:
Doklady Biological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the present study is investigation of the impact of mass development of cyanobacteria and Elodea on population characteristics (abundance, biomass, fecundity) and “health” parameters (the state of embryos, heart rate, and thermal resistance) of aquatic invertebrates in experiments with controlled conditions. In July–August 2018, in four variants of microcosms, the conditions were modeled characteristic of the coastal zone of the Rybinsk Reservoir in the period of mass development of cyanobacteria. Mass species were placed in microcosms of planktonic (with domination (80%) Daphnia longispina) and bottom animals (Unio pictorum, Gmelinoides fasciatus, Asellus aquaticus), as well as Elodea canadensis. In the variants with cyanobacteria, the toxic microcystins LR were revealed (24–53% of the sum of toxins, or from 6.6–66.5 μg/L). The presence of cyanobacteria (Aphanizomenon flos-aquae, Microcystis aeruginosa, and Gloeoitrichia spp.) influenced structural parameters of plankton: the quantity to green algae decreased, small-sized crustaceans increased. Influence of cyanobacteria caused reliable changes in parameters of aquatic animal from those of the control: thermal resitance of mollusks and amphipods decreased, time of restoration of heart rate after loads (salinity test) in mollusks increased; in amphipods, individual fecundity decreased, frequency of abnormalities and of mortality of embryos increased. The presence of Elodea intensified these effects. Thus, mass development of cyanobacteria and Elodea influences ecological–physiological parameters of aquatic animals, decreasing their adaptivity to natural stresses and deteriorating the quality of the progeny.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Kolmakov, V.I., Sib. Ekol. Zh., 2014, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 601–613.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berezina, N.A., Maximov, A.A., Umnova, L.P., et al., J. Sib. Fed. Univ. Biol., 2017, vol. 10, pp. 485–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Merel, S.D., Chicana, W.R., Snyder, S., Baures, E., and Thomas, O., Environ. Int., 2013, vol. 59, pp. 303–327.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chernova, E., Russkikh, I., Voyakina, E., and Zhakovskaya, Z., Oceanol. Hydrobiol. St., 2016, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 466–484.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gagala, I. and Mankiewicz-Boczek, J., Pol. J. Environ. St., 2012, vol. 21, pp. 1125–1139.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wood, R., Environ. Int., 2016, vol. 91, pp. 276–282.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kravtsova, L.S., Izhboldina, L.A., Mekhanikova, I.V., Pomazkina, G.V., and Belykh, O.I., Zh. Biol. Inv., 2010, no. 2, pp. 2–16.

  8. Bownik, A., Toxicon, 2016, vol. 124, pp. 26–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pflugmacher, S., Environ. Toxicol., 2002, vol. 17, pp. 407–413.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kholodkevich, S.V., Kuznetsova, T.V., Sharov, A.N., et al., J. Mar. Syst., 2017, vol. 171, pp. 151–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Verbitskii, V.B. and Berezina, N.A, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 2009, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 249–256.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gorokhova, E., Sundelin, B., and Berezina, N., HELCOM Technical Report, 2018. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.34346.52162

  13. Alan, J.D., Freshwater Biol., 1977, vol. 7, pp. 505–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kurbatova, S.A., Ershov, I.Yu., and Borisovskaya, E.V., Biol. Vnutr. Vod, 2017, vol. 1, pp. 84–92.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study was supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (project nos. АААА-А18-118012690101-2, АААА-А18-118012690096-1, and АААА-А19-119020690091-0) and by the Russian Foundation of Basic Research (project no. 18-04-01069-a).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. B. Verbitsky.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement on the welfare of animals. All applicable international national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Additional information

Translated by N. Smirnov

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Verbitsky, V.B., Kurbatova, S.A., Berezina, N.A. et al. Responses of Aquatic Organisms to Cyanobacteria and Elodea in Microcosms. Dokl Biol Sci 488, 136–140 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0012496619050028

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0012496619050028

Navigation