Abstract
Usually it is supposed that Majorana neutrino produced in the superposition state χ L = ν L + (ν L )c and then follows the neutrinoless double beta decay. But since the standard weak interactions are chiral invariant then neutrino at production has definite helicity (ν L and (ν L )c have opposite spirality). Then these neutrinos are separately produced and their superposition state cannot appear. Thus we see that for unsuitable helicity the neutrinoless double β decay is not possible even if it is supposed that neutrino is a Majorana particle (i.e. there is not a lepton number which is conserved). Also transition of Majorana neutrino ν L into antineutrino (ν L )c at their oscillations is forbidden since helicity in vacuum holds. Transition Majora neutrino ν L into (ν R )c (i.e., ν L → (ν R )c) at oscillations is unobserved since it is supposed that mass of (ν R )c is very big. If neutrino is a Dirac particle there can be transition of ν L neutrino into (sterile) antineutrino \( \bar v_R \) (i.e., ν L → \( \bar v_R \)) at neutrino oscillations if there takes place double violation of lepton number. It is necessary also to remark that introducing of a Majorana neutrino implies violation of global and local gauge invariance in the standard weak interactions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
P. M. A. Dirac, Proc. R. Soc. London A 117, 610 (1928).
E. Majorana, Nuovo Cimento 34, 170 (1937).
W. Pauli, Nuovo Cim. 6, 204 (1957); I. A. McLennam, Jr., Phys. Rev. 106, 821 (1957); K. M. Case, Phys. Rev. 107, 307 (1957); F. Gursey, Nuovo Cim. 7, 411 (1958).
M. Goldhaber, et al., Phys. Rev. 109, 1015 (1958); M. Barton et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 7, 23 (1961); G. Backenstoss et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 6, 415 (1961); R. Abela et al, Nucl. Phys. A 395, 413 (1983).
B. M. Pontecorvo, Sov. Phys. JETP 33, 549 (1957); Sov. Phys. JETP 34, 247 (1958).
Z. Maki et al., Prog. Theor. Phys. 28, 870 (1962).
B. M. Pontecorvo, Sov. Phys. JETP 53, 1717 (1967).
V. Gribov and B. M. Pontecorvo, Phys. Lett. B 28, 493 (1969).
S. M. Bilenky and S. T. Petcov, Rev. Mod. Phys. 99, 671 (1987).
F. Boehm and P. Vogel, Physics of Massive Neutrinos (Cambridge Univ., Cambridge, 1987), pp. 27, 121.
Kh. M. Beshtoev, JINR Commun. D2-2001-292 (Dubna, 2001); hep-ph/0204324, 2002; in Proc. of the 28th Intern. Cosmic Ray Conf. (Japan, 2003), vol. 1, p. 1507; JINR Commun. E2-2003-155 (Dubna, 2003).
Rev. Part. Phys., J. Phys. G (Nucl. Part. Phys.) 33, 35; 435 (2006).
M. Zralek, Acta Phys. Polon. B 28, 2225 (1997).
S. L. Glashow, Nucl. Phys. 22, 579 (1961); S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 1264 (1967); A. Salam, in Proc. of the 8th Nobel Symp., Ed. by N. Svarthholm (Almgvist and Wiksell, Stockholm, 1968), p. 367.
J. D. Vergados, Phys. Rep. 361, 1 (2002).
S. P. Rosen, “Lecture Notes on Mass Matrix,” LASL Preprint (1983).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The text was submitted by the authors in English.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beshtoev, K.M. Is realization of Majorana neutrino and neutrinoless double beta decay possible in the framework of standard weak interactions?. Phys. Part. Nuclei Lett. 6, 397–402 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1547477109050070
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1547477109050070