Skip to main content
Log in

Is realization of Majorana neutrino and neutrinoless double beta decay possible in the framework of standard weak interactions?

  • Physics of Elementary Particles and Atomic Nuclei. Theory
  • Published:
Physics of Particles and Nuclei Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Usually it is supposed that Majorana neutrino produced in the superposition state χ L = ν L + (ν L )c and then follows the neutrinoless double beta decay. But since the standard weak interactions are chiral invariant then neutrino at production has definite helicity (ν L and (ν L )c have opposite spirality). Then these neutrinos are separately produced and their superposition state cannot appear. Thus we see that for unsuitable helicity the neutrinoless double β decay is not possible even if it is supposed that neutrino is a Majorana particle (i.e. there is not a lepton number which is conserved). Also transition of Majorana neutrino ν L into antineutrino (ν L )c at their oscillations is forbidden since helicity in vacuum holds. Transition Majora neutrino ν L into (ν R )c (i.e., ν L → (ν R )c) at oscillations is unobserved since it is supposed that mass of (ν R )c is very big. If neutrino is a Dirac particle there can be transition of ν L neutrino into (sterile) antineutrino \( \bar v_R \) (i.e., ν L \( \bar v_R \)) at neutrino oscillations if there takes place double violation of lepton number. It is necessary also to remark that introducing of a Majorana neutrino implies violation of global and local gauge invariance in the standard weak interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. M. A. Dirac, Proc. R. Soc. London A 117, 610 (1928).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. E. Majorana, Nuovo Cimento 34, 170 (1937).

    Google Scholar 

  3. W. Pauli, Nuovo Cim. 6, 204 (1957); I. A. McLennam, Jr., Phys. Rev. 106, 821 (1957); K. M. Case, Phys. Rev. 107, 307 (1957); F. Gursey, Nuovo Cim. 7, 411 (1958).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Goldhaber, et al., Phys. Rev. 109, 1015 (1958); M. Barton et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 7, 23 (1961); G. Backenstoss et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 6, 415 (1961); R. Abela et al, Nucl. Phys. A 395, 413 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. B. M. Pontecorvo, Sov. Phys. JETP 33, 549 (1957); Sov. Phys. JETP 34, 247 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Z. Maki et al., Prog. Theor. Phys. 28, 870 (1962).

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. B. M. Pontecorvo, Sov. Phys. JETP 53, 1717 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  8. V. Gribov and B. M. Pontecorvo, Phys. Lett. B 28, 493 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. S. M. Bilenky and S. T. Petcov, Rev. Mod. Phys. 99, 671 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. F. Boehm and P. Vogel, Physics of Massive Neutrinos (Cambridge Univ., Cambridge, 1987), pp. 27, 121.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kh. M. Beshtoev, JINR Commun. D2-2001-292 (Dubna, 2001); hep-ph/0204324, 2002; in Proc. of the 28th Intern. Cosmic Ray Conf. (Japan, 2003), vol. 1, p. 1507; JINR Commun. E2-2003-155 (Dubna, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rev. Part. Phys., J. Phys. G (Nucl. Part. Phys.) 33, 35; 435 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Zralek, Acta Phys. Polon. B 28, 2225 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. L. Glashow, Nucl. Phys. 22, 579 (1961); S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 1264 (1967); A. Salam, in Proc. of the 8th Nobel Symp., Ed. by N. Svarthholm (Almgvist and Wiksell, Stockholm, 1968), p. 367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J. D. Vergados, Phys. Rep. 361, 1 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. S. P. Rosen, “Lecture Notes on Mass Matrix,” LASL Preprint (1983).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kh. M. Beshtoev.

Additional information

The text was submitted by the authors in English.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beshtoev, K.M. Is realization of Majorana neutrino and neutrinoless double beta decay possible in the framework of standard weak interactions?. Phys. Part. Nuclei Lett. 6, 397–402 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1547477109050070

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1547477109050070

PACS numbers

Navigation