Abstract
A two-humped model was proposed for explaining the suppression of the cross sections for the deep-subbarrier fusion of spherical nuclei that have intermediate atomic numbers. It was shown that the suppression of these cross sections was due to the interference between the incident and reflected fluxes between the two barriers. The results of fitting the cross sections calculated within the two-humped model revealed the invariability of the distance between the vertices of the two barriers. As the charges of colliding nuclei increase, the inner barrier becomes higher than the outer one, and this determines the competition with cross sections for deep-inelastic-transfer reactions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
C. L. Jiang, K. E. Rehm, R. V. F. Janssens, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 012701 (2004).
J. G. Keller, K.-H. Schmidt, F. P. Hessberger, et al., Nucl. Phys. A 452, 173 (1986).
C. L. Jiang, H. Esbensen, K. E. Rehm, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 052701 (2002).
Yu. Ts. Oganessian et al., JINR Rapid Commun. No. 1[75]-96, 123 (1996).
C. R. Morton, A. C. Berriman, M. Dasgupta, et al., Phys. Rev. C 60, 044608 (1999).
C. L. Jiang, B. B. Back, H. Esbensen, et al., Phys. Lett. B 640, 18 (2006).
M. Dasgupta, D. J. Hinde, A. Diaz-Torres, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 192701 (2007).
V. M. Shilov, in Proceedings of the 6th School-Seminar, Dubna, Russia, September 22–27, 1997, Ed. by Yu. Ts. Oganessian and R. Kalpakchieva (World Sci., Singapore, 1998), p. 331.
K. Hagino, N. Rowley, and M. Dasgupta, Phys. Rev. C 67, 054603 (2003).
C. H. Dasso and G. Pollarolo, Phys. Rev. C 68, 054604 (2003).
C. L. Jiang, H. Esbensen, B. B. Back, et al., Phys. Rev. C 69, 014604 (2004).
S. Misicu and H. Esbensen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 112701 (2006).
T. Ichikawa, K. Hagino, and I. Iwamoto, Phys. Rev. C 75, 057603 (2007).
G. Montagnoli, A. M. Stefanini, L. Corradi, et al., Phys. Rev. C 82, 064609 (2010).
J. Galin, D. Guerreau, M. Lefort, and X. Tarrago, Phys. Rev. C 9, 1018 (1974).
D. Glas and U. Mosel, Phys. Rev. C 10, 2620 (1974).
C. Ngo, B. Tamain, M. Beiner, et al., Nucl. Phys. A 252, 237 (1975).
J. Blocki, J. Randrup, W. J. Swiatecki, and C. F. Tsang, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 105, 427 (1977).
R. Schmidt, Z. Phys. A 325, 239 (1986).
C. H. Dasso, S. Landowne, and A. Winter, Nucl. Phys. A 405, 381 (1983).
R. Lindsay and N. Rowley, J. Phys. G 10, 805 (1983).
C. Y. Wong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 766 (1973).
V.S. Masterov and A. A. Seregin, Sov. J. Nucl.Phys. 27, 771 (1978).
B. S. Bhandari and A. S. Al-Kharam, Phys. Rev. C 39, 917 (1989).
A. V. Tarakanov, V. M. Shilov, and R. Shmidt, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 53, 791 (1991).
T. Matsuse, in Proceedings of the Tsukuba International Symposium, Ed. by K. Furuno, T. Kishimoto (Singapore, 1984), p. 113.
V. P. Permyakov and V. M. Shilov, Sov. J. Part. Nucl. 20, (1989).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Original Russian Text © V.M. Shilov, 2012, published in Yadernaya Fizika, 2012, Vol. 75, No. 4, pp. 485–490.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shilov, V.M. Subbarrier fusion of spherical nuclei of intermediate atomic number. Phys. Atom. Nuclei 75, 449–454 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778812030179
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778812030179