Skip to main content
Log in

The structure of the body cavity Pedicellina cernua (Pallas, 1775) and Barentsia discreta (Busk, 1886) (Kamptozoa, Coloniales)

  • Invertebrate Zoology
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The body-cavity ultrastructure of two species of colonial Kamptozoa is investigated in detail. The body cavity is separated from all surrounding tissues by a basal lamina, which underlies the ectodermal and endodermal epithelia and covers the excretory system, gonads, muscular cells, and nerves that cross the body cavity. The basal lamina does not cover the body-cavity cells, which, in respect to this feature, can be classified as connective-tissue cells. Several types of cells were identified in the body cavity of the calyx: amoeboid cells, dark spindle-shaped cells, cells containing phagosomes, cells of dorsoventral bundles, and cells adjoining the surface of the internal organs (gonads, digestive and nervous systems). The tubular cells of the stalk and stolon, as well as the amoeboid cells of the stolon, are described. The body cavity of Kamptozoa is characterized by features that allow interpreting it as a hemocoel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrikosov, G.G., Class Kamptozoa, Manual, vol. 1, Moscow, Leningrad: Biomedgiz, 1937, pp. 765–775.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Borisanova, A.O., Chernyshev, A.V., and Malakhova, V.V., Structure of the masculature in Barentsia discreta (Busk, 1886) (Kamptozoa, Coloniales), Russ. J. Mar. Biol., 2012, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 22–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dogel, V.A., Zoologiya pozvonochnykh (Zoology of Invertebrates), Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Atkins, D., The ciliary, feeding mechanism of the entoproct Polyzoa, and a comparison with that of the ectoproct Polyzoa, Quart. J. Microsc. Sci., 1932, vol. 75, pp. 393–423.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ax, P., Multicellular Animals, vol. 2: The Phylogenetic System of the Metazoa, Springer, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bartolomaeus, Th., Die Leibeshöhlenverhältnisse und Nephridialorgane der Bilateria, Ultrastruktur, Entwicklung und Evolution, Göttingen: Habilitationsschrift der Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brien, P., Classe des Endoproctes ou Kamptozoaries, in Traité Zoology, Paris: Masson et Cie, 1959, vol. 5, part 1, pp. 927–1007.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Emschermann, P., Les Kamptozoaires, état actuel de nos connaissances sur leur anatomie leur développement, leur biologie et leur position phylogénétique, Bull. Soc. Zool. France, 1982, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 317–344.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Franke, M., Ultrastructure of the protonephridia in Loxosomella fauveli, Barentsia matsushimana and Pedicellina cernua,Implications for the protonephridia in the ground pattern of the Entoprocta (Kamptozoa), Microfauna Mar., 1993, vol. 8, pp. 7–38.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Harmer, S.F., On the structure and development of Loxosoma,Quart. J. Microsc. Sci., 1885, vol. 25, pp. 261–337.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Haszprunar, G. and Wanninger, A., On the fine structure of the creeping larva of Loxosomella murmanica: additional evidence for a clade of Kamptozoa (Entoprocta) and Mollusca, Acta Zool., 2008, vol. 89, pp. 137–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hausdorf, B., Helmkampf, M., Meyer, A., et al., Spiralian phylogenomics supports the resurrection of Bryozoa comprising Ectoprocta and Entoprocta, Mol. Biol. Evol., 2007, vol. 24, pp. 2723–2729.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hyman, L.H., The Invertebrates, Vol. 3: Acanthocephala, Aschelminthes and Entoprocta, The Pseudocoelomate Bilateralia, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mariscal, R.N., The adult and larval morphology and life history of the entoproct Barentsia gracilis (M. Sars, 1835), J. Morphol., 1965, vol. 116, pp. 311–338.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mukai, H. and Makioka, T., Some observations on the sex differentiation of an entoproct, Barentsia discreta (Busk), J. Exp. Zool., 1980, vol. 213, no. 1, pp. 45–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nickerson, W.S., On Loxosoma davenporti sp. nov., An entoproct from the New England coast, J. Morphol., 1901, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 351–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nielsen, C., Entoproct life-cycles and the entoproct/ectoproct relationships, Ophelia, 1971, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 209–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nielsen, C. The relationships of Entoprocta, Ectoprocta and Phoronida, Am. Zool., 1977, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 149–150.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nielsen, C., Animal Evolution: Interrelationships of the Living Phyla, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2012, 3d ed.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nielsen, C., Jespersen, Å., Entoprocta, in Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates, New York: Wiley, 1997, vol. 13, pp. 13–43.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ruppert, E.E., Introduction to the aschelminth phyla: a consideration of mesoderm, body cavites, and cuticle, in Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates, New York: Wiley, 1991, vol. 4, pp. 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ruppert, E.E., Fox, R.S., and Barnes, R.D., Invertebrate Zoology, A Functional Evolutionary Approach, Thomson-Brooks/Cole, 2004, 7th ed.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. O. Borisanova.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.O. Borisanova, A.V. Chernyshev, V.V. Malakhov, 2014, published in Biologiya Morya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Borisanova, A.O., Chernyshev, A.V. & Malakhov, V.V. The structure of the body cavity Pedicellina cernua (Pallas, 1775) and Barentsia discreta (Busk, 1886) (Kamptozoa, Coloniales). Russ J Mar Biol 40, 426–439 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063074014060133

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063074014060133

Keywords

Navigation