Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of ISSR polymorphism among cattle breeds

  • Animal Genetics
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Polymorphism analysis of DNA fragments flanked by (AG)9C and (GA)9C inverted dinucleotide microsatellite repeats in 766 animals of 19 cattle breeds and one breeding type revealed 66 fragments, of which 64 were polymorphic. The breeds proved to differ in the frequency and presence or absence of amplified DNA fragments at the genomic level, indicating that ISSR fingerprinting is informative for differentiating the PCR product spectra and cattle breeds. Multilocus ISSR polymorphism analysis identified the group of fragments that can be used as Bos taurus and B. indicus species markers to describe the standards of breeds, their genetic profiles, and breed-specific patterns. Based on ISSR polymorphism, a prototypal gene pool of cattle was constructed and the breeds closest to it were identified. Genetic diversity analysis made it possible to assume that an optimal mean heterozygosity is characteristic of cattle breeds and that deviations from this optimum are indicative of various processes occurring in the population (breed).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jeffreys, A.J., Wilson, V., and Thein, S.L., Individual-Specific “Fingerprints” of Human DNA, Nature, 1985, vol. 316, pp. 76–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sulimova, G.E., DNA-Markers in Genetic Studies: Types of Markers, Their Properties and the Range of Application, Usp. Sovrem. Biol., 2004, vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 260–271.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kharchenko, P.N. and Glazko, V.I., DNK-tekhnologii v razvitii agrobiologii (DNA Technologies in Development of Agrobiology), Vanyushin, B.F., Ed., Moscow, 2006.

  4. Zietkiewicz, E., Rafalski, A., and Labuda, D., Genome Fingerprinting by Sequence Repeat (SSR)-Anchored Polymerase Chain Reaction Amplification, Genomics, 1994, pp. 176–183.

  5. STATISTICA for Windows (Computer Program Manual), Tulsa: StatSoft, 1996.

  6. Yeh, F.C., Yang, R.C., and Boyle, T., POPGENE. Microsoft Windows-Based Freeware for Population Genetic Analysis: Release 1.31, Edmonton: Univ. Alberta, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nei, M., Genetic Distance between Populations, Am. Naturalist, 1972, no. 949, pp. 283–292.

  8. Nei, M., Molecular Evolutionary Genetics, New York: Columbia University Press, 1987, pp. 176–187.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nei, M. and Kumar, S., Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stolpovskii, Yu.A., Kol, N.V., Evsyukov, A.N., et al., Analysis of Population Genetic Structure of Tuvinian Short-Fat-Tail Sheep Using ISSR-PCR Method, Russ. J. Genet., 2010, vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 1660–1669.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Altukhov, Yu.P. and Rychkov, Yu.G., Population Systems and Their Structural Components: Genetic Stability and Variation, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1970, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 507–526.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rychkov, Yu.G., System of Ancient Human Isolates in Northern Asia from the Genetic Aspects of Evolution and Stability of Populations, Vopr. Antropol., 1973, no. 44, pp. 3–22.

  13. Krasota, V.F., Lobanov, V.T., and Dzhaparidze, T.G., Razvedenie sel’skokhozyaistvennykh zhivotnykh (Livestock Breeding), Moscow: Kolos, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Loftus, R.T., MacHugh, D.E., Bradley, D.G., et al., Evidence for Two Independent Domestications of Cattle, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1994, vol. 91, pp. 2757–2761.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kolesnik, N.N., Evolyutsiya krupnogo rogatogo skota (Evolution of Cattle), Stalinabad: Tadzh. Fil. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kozir’, V.S., Barabash, V.I., Oliinik, S.O., et al., The Ukrainian Grey Cattle: Past, Present, and Future, Kozirya, V.S., Ed., Dnipropetrovs’k.: Ukrains’ka Akad. Agrarnikh Nauk, Institut tvarinnitstva tsentral’nikh raioniv, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Livshits, G. and Kobylansky, E., Lerner’s Concept of Development Homeostasis and the Problem of Heterozygosity Level in Natural Populations, Heredity, 1985, vol. 55, pp. 341–353.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Leary, R.F., Allendorf, F.W., and Knudsen, K.L., Differences in Inbreeding Coefficients Do not Explain the Association between Heterozygosity at Allozyme Loci and Developmental Stability in Rainbow Trout, Evolution, 1987, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1413–1415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu. A. Stolpovsky.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © Yu.A. Stolpovsky, M. Ahani Azari, A.N. Evsukov, N.V. Kol, M.N. Ruzina, V.N. Voronkova, G.E. Sulimova, 2011, published in Genetika, 2011, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 213–226.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stolpovsky, Y.A., Ahani Azari, M., Evsukov, A.N. et al. Comparison of ISSR polymorphism among cattle breeds. Russ J Genet 47, 189–200 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795410121051

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795410121051

Keywords

Navigation