Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative study of different wavelets for developing parsimonious Volterra model for rainfall-runoff simulation

  • Water Resources and the Regime of Water Bodies
  • Published:
Water Resources Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the Volterra models are non-parsimonious ones, they are being used because they can mimic dynamics of complex systems. However, applying and identification of the Volterra models using data may result in overfitting problem and uncertainty. In this investigation we evaluate capability of different wavelet forms for decomposing and compressing the Volterra kernels in order to overcome this problem by reducing the number of the model coefficients to be estimated and generating smooth kernels. A simulation study on a rainfall−runoff process over the Cache River watershed showed that the method performance is successful due to multi-resolution capacity of the wavelet analysis and high capability of the Volterra model. The results also revealed that db2 and sym2 wavelets have the same high potential in improving the linear Volterra model performance. However, QS wavelet was more successful in yielding smooth kernels. Moreover, the probability of overfitting while identifying the nonlinear Volterra model may be less than the linear model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chang, F.J., Chang, L.C., and Wang, Y.S, Enforeced selforganizing map neural networks for river flood forecasting, Hydrol. Process., 2007, vol. 21, pp. 741–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chou, C.M, Efficient nonlinear modeling of rainfallrunoff process using wavelet compression, J. Hydrol., 2007, vol. 332, pp. 442–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chou, C.M. and Wang, R.Y., On-line estimation of unit hydrographs using the wavelet-based LMS algorithm, Hydrol. Sci. J., 2002, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 721–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Diskin, M.H. and Boneh, A, Determination of optimal kernels for second order stationary surface runoff systems, Water Resour. Res., 1973, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 311–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Goulart, J.H.M. and Burt, P.M.S, Efficient kernel computation for Volterra filter structure evaluation, Signal Process. Lett., 2012, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 135–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kamruzzaman, M., Metcalfe, A., and Beecham, S, Wavelet based rainfall-stream flow models for the South-East Murray Darling Basin, J. Hydrol. Eng., 2014, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 1283–1293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Labat, D., Ababou, R., and Mangin, A, Linear and nonlinear input/output models for karstic springflow and flood prediction at different time scales, Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 1999, vol. 13, pp. 337–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lattermann, A., System-Theoretical Modeling in Surface Water Hydrology, Germany: Springer,1991, p. 200.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Maheswaran, R. and Khosa, R., Wavelet–Volterra coupled model for monthly stream flow forecasting, J. Hydrol., 2012a, vols. 450–451, pp. 320–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Maheswaran, R. and Khosa, R, Comparative study of different wavelets for hydrologic forecasting, Comput. Geosci., 2012b, vol. 46, pp. 284–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Muftuoglu, R.F, Monthly runoff generation by nonlinear models, J. Hydrol., 1991, vol. 125, pp. 277–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Napiorkowski, J.J, Application of Volterra series to modeling of rainfall-runoff systems and flow in open channels, Hydrol. Sci. J., 1986, vol. 31, nos. 2, 6, pp. 187–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Napiórkowski, J.J. and Kundzewicz, Z.W., A discrete conceptualization of a Volterra series model for surface runoff, Water Resour. Res., 1986, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1413–1421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Napiórkowski, J.J. and Piotrowski, A, Artificial neural networks as an alternative to the volterra series in rainfall-runoff modeling, Acta Geophys. Pol., 2005, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 459–472.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Napiórkowski, J.J. and Strupczewski, W.G, Problems involved in identification of the kernels of Volterra series, Acta Geophys. Pol., 1984, vol. XXXII, no. 4, pp. 375–391.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nikolaou, M. and Mantha, D, Efficient nonlinear modeling using wavelet compression, Progress in Systems and Control Theory, 2000, vol. 26, pp. 313–334.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Papazafiriou, Z.G, Linear and nonlinear approaches for short-term runoff estimations in time invariant open hydrologic systems, J. Hydrol., 1976, vol. 30, pp. 63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahsa H. Kashani.

Additional information

The article is published in the original.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kashani, M.H., Ghorbani, M.A., Dinpasho, Y. et al. Comparative study of different wavelets for developing parsimonious Volterra model for rainfall-runoff simulation. Water Resour 44, 568–578 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S009780781704008X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S009780781704008X

Keywords

Navigation