Skip to main content
Log in

Major factors of the evolution of basins and faults in the Baikal Rift Zone: Tectonophysical analysis

  • Published:
Geotectonics Aims and scope

Abstract

In order to identify the major factors of the formation of the Baikal Rift Zone, tectonophysical analysis is carried out based on physical modeling with the application of similarity criteria. A single-layer model of elastoplastic clayey paste is superposed on two metal plates. One of the metal plates is displaced leftward according to the simple shear mechanism and its contact with the second metal plate has a bend morphologically similar to the Baikal segment of a marginal suture of the Siberian Craton. This scheme of loading corresponds, to a great extent, to the passive mechanism of rifting; i.e., the deformed layer is destructed due to strikeslip displacement of blocks and development of pull-apart structure in the model without any uplift and thermal impact related to the influence of mantle asthenolith in nature. The series of runs reproduces the major spatiotemporal trends in the evolution of the Baikal Rift Zone. Some experiments achieve for the first time a high degree of similarity in the morphology and mutual alignment of its main basins. This makes it possible to conclude that the evolution of basins and faults in the Baikal Rift Zone was governed by the following factors: (1) elastoplastic response of the substrate with a regular localization of strain; (2) left-lateral displacement of blocks; and (3) the presence of curved (in plan view) initiating structural heterogeneity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Geology and Seismicity of the BAM Zone. Neotectonics, Ed. by N. A. Logachev (Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1984) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. V. Gzovsky, Main Issues of Tectonophysics and Tectonics of the Baidzhansai Anticlinorium (Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow, 1963), Part 3, 4 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yu. A. Zorin and E. Kh. Turutanov, “Plumes and Geodynamics of the Baikal Rift Zone,” Geol. Geofiz. 46(7), 685–699 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. L. Kopp, Structures of Lateral Extrusion in the Alpine-Himalayas Collision Belt (Nauchnyi Mir, Moscow, 1997) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. V. Krylov, M. M. Mandelbaum, B. P. Mishen’kin, Z. P. Mishen’kina, G. V. Petrik, and V. S. Seleznev, The Deep Structure of Baikal from Seismic Data (Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1981) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  6. I. Yu. Kulakov, “3D Seismic Heterogeneities beneath the Baikal Region from Data of Local and Teleseismic Tomography,” Geol. Geofiz. 40(3), 317–331 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. G. Levi, A. V. Arzhannikova, V. Yu. Buddo, P. G. Kirilov, A. V. Lukhnev, A. I. Miroshnichenko, and V. V. Rutsich, “Recent Geodynamic of the Baikal Rift,” Razved. Okhr. Nedr, No. 1, 10–20 (1997).

  8. Yu. G. Leonov, “Continental Rifting: Modern Views, Problems, and Solutions,” Geotektonika 35(2), 3–16 (2001) [Geotectonics 35 (2), 81–92(2001)].

    Google Scholar 

  9. N. A. Logachev, “History and Geodynamics of the Baikal Rift,” Geol. Geofiz. 44(5), 391–406 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  10. N. A. Logachev, S. A. Bornyakov, and S. I. Sherman, “Mechanism of the Baikal Rift Zone Formation Based on Results of Physical Modeling,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk 373(3), 388–390 (2000) [Dokl. Earth Sci. 373A (6), 980–982 (2000)].

    Google Scholar 

  11. N. A. Logachev, T. K. Lomonosova, and V. M. Klimanova, Cenozoic Sedimentary Rocks of the Irkutsk Amphitheater (Nauka, Moscow, 1964) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  12. N. A. Logachev and N. A. Florensov, “The Baikal System of the Rift Valleys,” in Role of Rifting in Geological History of the Earth (Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1977), pp. 19–29 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  13. O. V. Lunina and A. S. Gladkov, “Active Faults and Stress Fields of the Northeastern Flank of the Baikal Rift Zone,” Geol. Geofiz. 49(2), 1–11 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  14. I. V. Luchitsky and P. M. Bondarenko, “Experiments on Modeling of Arched Uplifts of Baikal Rift,” Geotektonika 2(2), 3–20 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  15. V. D. Mats, G. F. Ufimtsev, M. M. Mandelbaum, A. M. Alakshin, A. V. Pospeev, M. N. Shimaraev, and O. M. Chlystov, Cenozoic of the Baikal Rift Basin: Structure and Geological History (Geo, Novosibirsk, 2001) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  16. V. I. Mel’nikova and N. A. Radziminovich, “Mechanism of Earthquake Focal Zones of the Baikal Region during 1991–1996,” Geol. Geofiz. 39(11), 1598–1607 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. M. Plotnikov, Shear Structures in Bedded Geological Bodies (Nedra, Leningrad, 1991) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. V. Rasskazov, Magmatism of the Baikal Rift System (Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1993) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  19. V. V. Ruzhich, Seismotectonic Destruction in the Earth’s Crust of the Baikal Rift Zone (Siberian Branch, Russian Acad. Sci., Novosibirsk, 1997) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  20. D. V. Rundqvist, P. O. Sobolev, and V. M. Ryakhovsky, “Reflection of Different Fracture Types in the Seismicity of the Baikal Rift Zone,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk 366(6), 823–825 (1999) [Dokl. Earth Sci. 367 (5), 708–711 (1999)].

    Google Scholar 

  21. V. A. San’kov, Yu. I. Dneprovsky, S. N. Kovalenko, S. A. Bornyakov, N. A. Guleva, and N. G. Gorbunova, Faults and Seismicity of the North Muya Geodynamic Research Area (Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1991) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  22. K. Zh. Seminsky, “Principles and Stages of the Thematic Mapping of the Fault-Block Structure Based on the Study of Fracturing,” Geol. Geofiz. 35(9), 112–130 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  23. K. Zh. Seminsky, “Tectonophysic Factors of Destruction of the Lithosphere: A Case of the Himalayan Compression Zone,” Tikhookean. Geol. 20(6), 17–30 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  24. K. Zh. Seminsky, Inner Structure of the Continental Fault Zones. Tectonophysic Aspect (Geo, Novosibirsk, 2003) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  25. K. Zh. Seminsky and Ya. B. Radziminovich, “Seismicity of the South Siberian Craton: Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Origin,” Fiz. Zemli, No. 9, 18–30 (2007).

  26. A. V. Solonenko, N. V. Solonenko, V. I. Mel’nikova, B. M. Kazmin, O. A. Kuchai, and S. S. Sukhanova, “Stresses and Displacements in the Earthquake Focal Zones of Siberia and Mongolia,” in Seismicity and Seismic Zoning of the Northern Eurasia (Inst. Physics of the Earth, Moscow, 1993), No. 1, pp. 113–122 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  27. S. Stoyanov, Formation Mechanism of Fracture Zones (Nedra, Moscow, 1977) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  28. V. G. Trifonov, Neotectonics of Eurasia (Nauchnyi Mir, Moscow, 1999) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  29. S. I. Sherman, Physical Principles of Faulting in the Earth’s Crust (Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1977) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  30. S. I. Sherman, S. A. Bornyakov, and V. Yu. Buddo, Areas of Dynamic Effects of Faults (Modeling Results) (Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1983) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  31. S. I. Sherman and Yu. I. Dneprovsky, “Fields of Tectonic Stress in the Baikal Rift Zone,” Geotektonika 27(2), 101–112 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  32. S. I. Sherman and K. G. Levi, “Transform Faults of the Baikal Rift Zone and Seismicity of Its Flanks,” in Tectonics and Seismicity of the Continental Rift Zones (Nauka, Moscow, 1978), pp. 7–18 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  33. V. E. Khain, “Origin of the Central Asian Mountain Belt: Collision or Mantle Diapirism?,” in Geodynamics of Intracontinental Mountain Regions (Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1990), pp. 5–8 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  34. V. E. Khain and M. G. Lomize, Geotectonics with Principles of Geodynamics (KDU, Moscow, 2005) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  35. A. V. Yakovlev, I. Yu. Kulakov, and S. A. Tychkov, “The Moho Depth and 3D Structure of the Seismic Anomalies of the Earth’ Crust and Uppermost Mantle in the Baikal Region from Local Tomography,” Geol. Geofiz. 48(2), 261–282 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  36. V. Yaroshevsky, Tectonics of Faults and Folds (Nedra, Moscow, 1981) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  37. E. Calais, M. Vergnolle, and V. San’kov, A. Lukhnev, A. Miroshnitchenko, S. Amarjargal, and J. Deverchere, “GPS Measurements of Crustal Deformation in the Baikal-Mongolia Area (1994–2002): Implications for Current Kinematics of Asia,” J. Geophys. Res. 108(B10), (2003) (doi:10.1029/2002JB002373).

  38. A. Chemenda, J. Deverchere, and E. Calais, “Three-Dimensional Laboratory Modeling of Rifting: Application to the Baikal Rift, Russia,” Tectonophysics 356, 253–273 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. P. R. Cobbold and C. C. Ferguson, “Description and Origin of Spatial Periodicity in Tectonic Structures: Report on a Tectonic Studies Group Conference Held at Nottingham University, November, 1978,” J. Struct. Geol. 1(1), 93–97 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. D. Delvaux, R. Moyes, G. Stapel, C. Petu, K. Levi, A. Miroshnichenko, V. Ruzhich, and V. San’kov, “Paleostress Reconstruction and Geodynamics of the Baikal Region, Central Asia. Pt. II: Cenozoic Rifting,” Tectonophysics 282, 1–38 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. D. I. Doser, “Faulting within the Eastern Baikal Rift as Characterized by Earthquake Studies,” Tectonophysics 196(1–2), 109–139 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. F. Houdry, J. Deverchere, Y. Gaudemer, E. Burov, and V. San’kov, “Evidence for Oblique Extension in the Baikal Rift, Siberia, from Multisource Data,” EOS. Trans. AGU 75(44), (1994).

  43. O. Lesne, E. Calais, and J. Deverchere, “Finite Element Modeling of Crustal Deformation in the Baikal Rift Zone: New Insights into the Active-Passive Rifting Debate,” Tectonophysics 289, 327–340 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. N. A. Logatchev and Yu. A. Zorin, “Baikal Rift Zone: Structure and Geodynamics,” Tectonophysics 208, 273–286 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. G. Mandl, Mechanics of Tectonic Faulting. Models and the Basic Concepts (Elsevier, 1988).

  46. C. Petit, J. Deverchere, F. Houdry-Lemont, V. Sankov, V. Melnikova, and D. Delvaux, “Present-Day Stress Field Changes along the Baikal Rift and Tectonic Implications,” Tectonics 15, 1171–1191 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. O. P. Polyansky, “Dynamic Causes for the Opening of the Baikal Rift Zone: A Numerical Modeling Approach,” Tectonophysics 351, 91–117 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Zh. Seminsky.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © K.Zh. Seminsky, 2009, published in Geotektonika, 2009, No. 6, pp. 52–69.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seminsky, K.Z. Major factors of the evolution of basins and faults in the Baikal Rift Zone: Tectonophysical analysis. Geotecton. 43, 486–500 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1134/S001685210906003X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S001685210906003X

Keywords

Navigation