Skip to main content
Log in

Echolocation signals of wild dolphins

  • Biological Acoustics
  • Published:
Acoustical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most of our understanding of dolphin echolocation has come from studies of captive dolphins performing various echolocation tasks. Recently, measurements of echolocation signals in the wild have expanded our understanding of the characteristics of these signals in a natural setting. Measuring undistorted dolphin echolocation signals with free swimming dolphins in the field can be a challenging task. A four hydrophone array arranged in a symmetrical star pattern was used to measure the echolocation signals of four species of dolphins in the wild. Echolocation signals of the following dolphins have been measured with the symmetrical star array: white-beaked dolphins in Iceland, Atlantic spotted dolphins in the Bahamas, killer whales in British Columbia, and dusky dolphins in New Zealand. There are many common features in the echolocation signals of the different species. Most of the signals had spectra that were bimodal: two peaks, one at low frequencies and another about an octave higher in frequency. The source level of the sonar transmission varies as a function of 20logR, suggesting a form of time-varying gain but on the transmitting end of the sonar process rather than the receiving end. The results of the field work call into question the issue of whether the signals used by captive dolphins may be shaped by the task they are required to perform rather than what they would do more naturally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W. W. L. Au, D. A. Carder, R. H. Penner, and B. L. Scronce, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 77, 726 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. W. W. L. Au, J. L. Pawloski, P. E. Nachtigall, et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 51 (1995).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. W. W. L. Au and D. L. Herzing, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113, 598 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. M. H. Rasmussen, L. A. Miller, and W. W. L. Au, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111, 1122 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. W. W. L. Au, J. K. B. Ford, J. K. Home, and K. A. Allman, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (in press).

  6. W. W. L. Au and B Wursig, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (in press).

  7. W. W. L. Au, The Sonar of Dolphins (Springer, New York, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. W. L. Au and K. J. Benoit-Bird, Nature 423, 861 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. L. A. Simmons, A. J. M. Moffat, and W. M. Masters, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91, 1150 (1992).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. R. J. Urick, Principles of Underwater Sound, 3rd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1983; Sudostroenie, Leningrad, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. W. Rihaczek, Principles of High-Resolution Radar (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. R. Ketten, in Hearing by Whales and Dolphins, Ed. by W. W. L. Au, A. N. Popper, and R. R. Fay (Springer, New York, 2000), pp. 43–108.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. R. Heithaus and L. M. Dill, in Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals, Ed. by W. F. Perrin, B. Wursig, and J. G. M. Thewissen (Academic, San Diego, 2002), pp. 411–422.

    Google Scholar 

  14. W. W. Evans and B. A. Powell, in Animal Sonar Systems: Biology and Bionics, Ed. by R. G. Busnel (Laboratoire de Physiologic Acoustique, Jouy-en-Josas, 1967), pp. 363–382.

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. P. Morozov, A. E. Akopian, V. Burdin, et al., Biofizika 17, 139 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  16. T. Cranford, in Animal Sonar: Processes and Performance, Ed. by P. E. Nachtigall and P. W. B. Moore (Plenum, New York, 1988), pp. 67–77.

    Google Scholar 

  17. T. Cranford, in Hearing by Whales and Dolphins, Ed. by W. W. L. Au, A. N. Popper, and R. R. Fay (Springer, New York, 2000), pp. 109–155.

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. H. Ridgway, D. A. Carder, T. Kamonick, et al., J. Exp. Biol. 204, 3829 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. H. Penner, in Animal Sonar: Processes and Performance, Ed. by P. E. Nachtigall and P. W. B. Moore (Plenum, New York, 1988), pp. 707–713.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. K. B. Ford, E. M. Graeme, L. G. Barrett-Lennard, et al., Can. J. Zool. 76, 1456 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. R. H. Love, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 49, 816 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

From Akusticheski\(\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\smile}$}}{l} \) Zhurnal, Vol. 50, No. 4, 2004, pp. 533–542.

Original English Text Copyright © 2004 by Au.

This article was submitted by the author in English.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Au, W.W.L. Echolocation signals of wild dolphins. Acoust. Phys. 50, 454–462 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1776224

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1776224

Keywords

Navigation