Abstract
We perform a global analysis of experimental data on jet quenching for heavy flavors for scenarios with and without quark-gluon plasma formation in pp collisions. We find that the theoretical predictions for the nuclear modification factor RAA for heavy flavors at the LHC energies are very similar for these scenarios, and the results for RAA and \({{{v}}_{2}}\) agree reasonably with the LHC data. The agreement with data at the RHIC top energy becomes somewhat better for the intermediate scenario, in which the quark-gluon plasma formation in pp collisions occurs only at the LHC energies. Our fits to heavy flavor RAA show that description of jet quenching for heavy flavors requires somewhat bigger αs than data on jet quenching for light hadrons.
Notes
Note that we ignore the B → D → e process since it gives a negligible contribution [45].
For HFEs we use a smaller lower limit of pT since for HFEs, due to the presence of the additional FF De/M, the ratio of the typical transverse momentum of the original heavy quarks to the transverse momentum of the final detected particle for HFEs becomes bigger by a factor of ~2 than that for heavy mesons.
REFERENCES
R. Baier, Y. L. Dokshitzer, A. H. Mueller, S. Peigné, and D. Schiff, Nucl. Phys. B 483, 291 (1997).
B. G. Zakharov, JETP Lett. 63, 952 (1996).
U. A. Wiedemann, Nucl. Phys. A 690, 731 (2001).
M. Gyulassy, P. Lévai, and I. Vitev, Nucl. Phys. B 594, 371 (2001).
P. Arnold, G. D. Moore, and L. G. Yaffe, J. High Energy Phys. 0206, 030 (2002).
R. Baier, D. Schiff, and B. G. Zakharov, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 50, 37 (2000).
J. D. Bjorken, Fermilab Preprint 82/59-THY (1982, unpublished).
B. G. Zakharov, JETP Lett. 86, 444 (2007).
W. Broniowski and W. Florkowski, Phys. Rev. C 65, 024905 (2002).
V. Khachatryan et al. (CMS Collab.), J. High Energy Phys. 1009, 091 (2010).
G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collab.), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 172301 (2016).
J. Adam et al. (ALICE Collab.), Nat. Phys. 13, 535 (2017).
R. Campanini, G. Ferri, and G. Ferri, Phys. Lett. B 703, 237 (2011).
L. van Hove, Phys. Lett. B 118, 138 (1982).
R. Field, Acta Phys. Polon. B 42, 2631 (2011).
B. G. Zakharov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 032301 (2014).
S. Tripathy (for ALICE Collab.), arXiv: 2103.07218.
B. G. Zakharov, JETP Lett. 116, 347 (2022).
B. G. Zakharov, J. High Energy Phys., No. 09, 087 (2021).
A. Bazavov et al., Phys. Rev. D 98, 054511 (2018).
J. Braun and H. Gies, Phys. Lett. B 645, 53 (2007).
L. Apolin_ario, Y.-J. Lee, and M. Winn, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 127, 103990 (2022).
Y. L. Dokshitzer and D. E. Kharzeev, Phys. Lett. B 519, 199 (2001).
B. I. Abelev et al. (STAR Collab.), Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 192301 (2007);
Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 159902(E) (2011).
S. S. Adler et al. (PHENIX Collab.), Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 032301 (2006).
P. Aurenche and B. G. Zakharov, JETP Lett. 90, 237 (2009).
B. G. Zakharov, JETP Lett. 96, 616 (2013).
B. G. Zakharov, J. Phys. G 40, 085003 (2013).
B. G. Zakharov, JETP Lett. 103, 363 (2016).
B. G. Zakharov, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 129, 521 (2019).
B. G. Zakharov, JETP Lett. 80, 617 (2004).
S. Shi, J. Liao, and M. Gyulassy, Chin. Phys. C 43, 044101 (2019).
D. Zigic, B. Ilic, Mark Djordjevic, and Magd. Djordjevic, Phys. Rev. C 101, 064909 (2020).
B. Blok and K. Tywoniuk, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 560 (2019).
B. Blok, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 729 (2020).
B. Blok, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 832 (2021).
R. Rapp, P. B. Gossiaux, A. Andronic, R. Averbeck, S. Masciocchi, A. Beraudo, E. Bratkovskaya, P. Braun-Munzinger, S. Cao, A. Dainese, S. K. Das, M. Djordjevic, V. Greco, M. He, H. van Hees, et al., Nucl. Phys. A 979, 21 (2018).
Zhong-Bo Kang, F. Ringer, and I. Vitev, J. High Energy Phys., No. 03, 146 (2017).
P. Lévai and U. Heinz, Phys. Rev. C 57, 1879 (1998).
B. G. Zakharov, JETP Lett. 88, 781 (2008).
B. G. Zakharov, J. Phys. G 48, 055009 (2021).
S. Kretzer, H. L. Lai, F. Olness, and W. K. Tung, Phys. Rev. D 69, 114005 (2004).
K. J. Eskola, H. Paukkunen, and C. A. Salgado, J. High Energy Phys. 0904, 065 (2009).
T. Sjostrand, L. Lonnblad, S. Mrenna, and P. Skands, arXiv: hep-ph/0308153.
M. Cacciari, P. Nason, and R. Vogt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 122001 (2005).
A. H. Mahmood et al. (CLEO Collab.), Phys. Rev. D 70, 032003 (2004).
R. Poling, Invited Talk at 4th Flavor Physics and CP Violation Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, Apr. 9–12, 2006.
B. Aubert et al. (BaBar Collab.), Phys. Rev. D 75, 072002 (2007).
O. Kaczmarek and F. Zantow, Phys. Rev. D 71, 114510 (2005).
R. Baier, Y. L. Dokshitzer, A. H. Mueller, and D. Schiff, J. High Energy Phys. 0109, 033 (2001).
J. D. Bjorken, Phys. Rev. D 27, 140 (1983).
D. Kharzeev and M. Nardi, Phys. Lett. B 507, 121 (2001).
B. G. Zakharov, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 124, 860 (2017).
B. G. Zakharov, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 427 (2018).
B. Müller and K. Rajagopal, Eur. Phys. J. C 43, 15 (2005).
S. Borsanyi, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor, A. Jakovac, S. D. Katz, S. Krieg, C. Ratti, and K. K. Szabo, J. High Energy Phys. 1011, 077 (2010).
J. Adam et al. (ALICE Collab.), J. High Energy Phys., No. 03, 081 (2016).
Tech. Rep. CMSPAS-HIN-15-005 (CERN, Geneva, 2015). https://cds.cern.ch/record/2055466/_les/HIN-15-005-pas.pdf.
S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collab.), J. High Energy Phys., No. 01, 174 (2022).
A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collab.), Phys. Lett. B 782, 474 (2018).
J. Adam et al. (ALICE Collab.), Phys. Lett. B 771, 467 (2017).
S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collab.), Phys. Lett. B 804, 135377 (2020).
A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collab.), Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 152301 (2017).
S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collab.); arXiv: 2202.00815.
A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collab.), Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 022001 (2019).
J. Park (for the ALICE Collab.), PoS (HardProbes2020), 034 (2021). https://doi.org/10.22323/1.387.0034
D. Li, F. Si, Y. Zhao, P. Zhou, Y. Zhang, X. Li, and C. Yang, Phys. Lett. B 832, 137249 (2022).
S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collab.), J. High Energy Phys., No. 02, 150 (2019).
A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collab.), Phys. Lett. B 816, 136253 (2021).
Tech. Rep. CMS-PAS-HIN-21-003 (CERN, Geneva, 2021). https://cds.cern.ch/record/2806157/_les/HIN-21-003-pas.pdf.
J. Adam et al. (STAR Collab.), Phys. Rev. C 99, 034908 (2019).
A. Adare et al. (PHENIX Collab.), Phys. Rev. C 84, 044905 (2011).
M. S. Abdallah et al. (STAR Collab.), arXiv: 2111.14615.
B. G. Zakharov, JETP Lett. 112, 681 (2020).
Funding
This work is supported by the state program 0033-2019-0005.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest.
APPENDIX
APPENDIX
In this appendix we give, for the convenience of the reader, formulas for calculation of the gluon emission x-spectrum dP/dx. We use the representation of the induced gluon spectrum obtained in [31] with the prescription of [74] for incorporating the T-dependent running αs. For a fast quark with momentum along the z-axis produced at z = 0 in the matter of thickness L, dP/dx has the form
where n(z) is the medium number density, d\(\sigma _{{{\text{eff}}}}^{{BH}}\)/dx is an effective Bethe-Heitler cross section for q → gq process, given by
Here \(P_{q}^{g}\)(x) = (4/3)[1 + (1 – x)2]/x is the ordinary pQCD q → g splitting function, M = Eqx(1 – x), Lf = 2M/\({{\epsilon }^{2}}\), \({{\epsilon }^{2}}\) = \(m_{q}^{2}\)x2 + \(m_{g}^{2}\)(1 – x), Q2(ξ) = aM/ξ with a ≈ 1.85 [8], F is the solution to the radial Schrödinger equation
with the azimuthal quantum number m = 1, and the boundary condition F(ξ = 0, ρ) = \(\sqrt \rho {{\sigma }_{{gq\bar {q}}}}\)(ρ, x, z)\(\epsilon \)K1(\(\epsilon \)ρ) at ξ = 0 (K1 is the Bessel function). The potential \({v}\) reads
where \({{\sigma }_{{gq\bar {q}}}}\)(ρ, x, z) is the three-body cross section of interaction of the gq\(\bar {q}\) system with a medium constituent located at z (ρ is the transverse distance between g and the final quark q). In the transverse plane \(\bar {q}\) is located at the center of mass of the gq pair. The \({{\sigma }_{{gq\bar {q}}}}\) can be written via the local dipole cross section \({{\sigma }_{{q\bar {q}}}}\)(ρ, z) (for the color singlet \(q\bar {q}\) pair)
In the two-gluon approximation the dipole cross section reads
where CF, T are the color Casimir for the quark and thermal parton (quark or gluon), and μD(z) is the local Debye mass.
For the QGP fireball in AA collisions the coordinate z coincides with the proper time τ, i.e. in terms of the real fireball number density, nf(ρ, τ), we have n(z) = nf(ρj(ρj0, τ), τ), where ρj0 is the jet production transverse coordinate, and ρj(ρj0, τ) = ρj0 + τpT/|pT| is the jet trajectory. We use the approximation of a uniform fireball. In this case, inside the fireball, the function nf(ρ, τ) does not depend on the jet production point. This greatly reduces the computational cost, since one can tabulate the L-dependence of the induced gluon spectrum once, and then use it for calculations of the FFs for arbitrary jet geometry.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zakharov, B.G. Jet Quenching for Heavy Flavors in AA and pp Collisions. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 136, 572–584 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063776123050059
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063776123050059