AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
AEM.02590-06v1
73/13/4128    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeBlanc, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Filion, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LeBlanc, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Filion, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by LeBlanc, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Filion, M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, July 2007, p. 4128-4134, Vol. 73, No. 13
0099-2240/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.02590-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Alteration of Soil Rhizosphere Communities following Genetic Transformation of White Spruce{triangledown}

Philippe M. LeBlanc,1 Richard C. Hamelin,2 and Martin Filion1*

Université de Moncton, Department of Biology, Moncton, NB, Canada E1A 3E9,1 Laurentian Forestry Centre, Natural Resources Canada, 1055 du PEPS Street, Sainte-Foy, QC, Canada G1V 4C72

Received 7 November 2006/ Accepted 21 April 2007

The application of plant genetic manipulations to agriculture and forestry with the aim of alleviating insect damage through Bacillus thuringiensis transformation could lead to a significant reduction in the release of pesticides into the environment. However, many groups have come forward with very valid and important questions related to potentially adverse effects, and it is crucial to assess and better understand the impact that this technology might have on ecosystems. In this study, we analyzed rhizosphere soil samples collected from the first B. thuringiensis-transformed trees [with insertion of the CryIA(b) toxin-encoding gene] grown in Canada (Val-Cartier, QC, Canada) as part of an ecological impact assessment project. Using a robust amplified rRNA gene restriction analysis approach coupled with 16S rRNA gene sequencing, the rhizosphere-inhabiting microbial communities of white spruce (Picea glauca) genetically modified by biolistic insertion of the cryIA(b), uidA (beta-glucuronidase), and nptII genes were compared with the microbial communities associated with non-genetically modified counterparts and with trees in which only the genetic marker genes uidA and nptII have been inserted. Analysis of 1,728 rhizosphere bacterial clones (576 clones per treatment) using a Cramér-von Mises statistic analysis combined with a Monte Carlo comparison clearly indicated that there was a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) between the microbial communities inhabiting the rhizospheres of trees carrying the cryIA(b), uidA, and nptII transgenes, trees carrying only the uidA and nptII transgenes, and control trees. Clear rhizosphere microbial community alterations due to B. thuringiensis tree genetic modification have to our knowledge never been described previously and open the door to interesting questions related to B. thuringiensis genetic transformation and also to the impact of commonly used uidA and nptII genetic marker genes.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Université de Moncton, Department of Biology, Moncton, NB, Canada E1A 3E9. Phone: (506) 858-4329. Fax: (506) 858-4541. E-mail: martin.filion{at}umoncton.ca

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 27 April 2007.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, July 2007, p. 4128-4134, Vol. 73, No. 13
0099-2240/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.02590-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.