AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Siewert, K.
Right arrow Articles by Gieffers, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Siewert, K.
Right arrow Articles by Gieffers, J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 2005, p. 1852-1856, Vol. 49, No. 5
0066-4804/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.49.5.1852-1856.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Growth Cycle-Dependent Pharmacodynamics of Antichlamydial Drugs

Katrin Siewert,1 Jan Rupp,1 Matthias Klinger,2 Werner Solbach,1 and Jens Gieffers1*

Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene,1 Institute for Anatomy, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Lübeck, Germany2

Received 7 October 2004/ Returned for modification 13 November 2004/ Accepted 16 January 2005

Chlamydiae are obligate intracellular pathogens that exhibit an extensive intracellular developmental cycle in vivo. Clinical treatment of chlamydial infection is typically initiated upon occurrence of symptomatology and is directed against an asynchronous population of different chlamydial developmental forms. Pharmacodynamics of antichlamydial drugs are predominantly characterized by MICs; however, in vitro determinations of MIC may not reflect differential susceptibilities of the developmental cycle. In this study, we correlated the antichlamydial effect of erythromycin, rifampin, doxycycline, and ciprofloxacin with the developmental stage of a fast-replicating and a slow-replicating chlamydial species. In addition, we describe the influence of concentration on killing. Extracellular elementary bodies and very-early-phase and late-phase chlamydiae were refractory to all tested antibiotics except rifampin, which was very effective against early-cycle chlamydiae. Rifampin was the most effective antibiotic overall, killed in a dose dependent matter, and exhibited moderate synergism with erythromycin. These considerations provide important information on chlamydial biology and antimicrobial susceptibility. A combinational therapy of rifampin and a macrolide should be considered in therapy-refractory infections.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Lübeck, Germany. Phone: 49 451 5004409. Fax: 49 451 5002808. E-mail: Jens.Gieffers{at}hygiene.ukl.mu-luebeck.de.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 2005, p. 1852-1856, Vol. 49, No. 5
0066-4804/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.49.5.1852-1856.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.