AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hurdle, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Chopra, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hurdle, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Chopra, I.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, November 2004, p. 4366-4376, Vol. 48, No. 11
0066-4804/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.11.4366-4376.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Analysis of Mupirocin Resistance and Fitness in Staphylococcus aureus by Molecular Genetic and Structural Modeling Techniques

Julian Gregston Hurdle,1 Alexander John O'Neill,1 Eileen Ingham,1 Colin Fishwick,2 and Ian Chopra1*

Antimicrobial Research Centre and School of Biochemistry and Microbiology,1 Antimicrobial Research Centre and Department of Chemistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom2

Received 6 February 2004/ Returned for modification 2 May 2004/ Accepted 17 July 2004

Chromosomal resistance to mupirocin in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus arises from V588F or V631F mutations in isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase (IRS). Whether these are the only IRS mutations that confer mupirocin resistance or simply those that survive in the clinic is unknown. Mupirocin-resistant mutants of S. aureus 8325-4 were therefore generated to examine their ileS genotypes and the in vitro and in vivo fitness costs associated with them before and after compensatory evolution. Most spontaneous first-step mupirocin-resistant mutants carried V588F or V631F mutations in IRS, but a new mutation (G593V) was also identified. Second-step mutants carried combinations of previously identified IRS mutations (e.g., V588F/V631F and G593V/V631F), but additional combinations also occurred involving novel mutations (R816C, H67Q, and F563L). First-step mupirocin-resistant mutants were not associated with substantial fitness costs, a finding that is consistent with the occurrence of V588F or V631F mutations in the IRS of clinical strains. Second-step mutants were unfit, but fitness could be restored by subculture in the absence of mupirocin. In most cases, this was the result of compensatory mutations that also suppressed mupirocin resistance (e.g., A196V, E190K, and E195K), despite retention of the original mutations conferring resistance. Structural explanations for mupirocin resistance and loss of fitness were obtained by molecular modeling of mutated IRS enzymes, which provided data on mupirocin binding and interaction with the isoleucyl-AMP reactive intermediate.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Antimicrobial Research Centre and School of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-113-343-5604. Fax: 44-113-343-5638. E-mail: i.chopra{at}leeds.ac.uk.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, November 2004, p. 4366-4376, Vol. 48, No. 11
0066-4804/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.11.4366-4376.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2004 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.