Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 4 August 2006:
Vol. 313. no. 5787, p. 615
DOI: 10.1126/science.1126478
Prev | Table of Contents | Next

Technical Comments

Comment on "Post-Wildfire Logging Hinders Regeneration and Increases Fire Risk"

M. Newton,1 S. Fitzgerald,2 R. R. Rose,1 P. W. Adams,3 S. D. Tesch,3 J. Sessions,3* T. Atzet,4 R. F. Powers,5 C. Skinner5

Donato et al. (Brevia, 20 January 2006, p. 352) concluded that logging after wildfire kills natural regeneration and increases fire risk. We argue that their paper lacks adequate context and supporting information to be clearly interpreted by scientists, resource managers, policy-makers, and the public.

1 Department of Forest Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.
2 Department of Forest Resources, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.
3 Department of Forest Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.
4 Atzet Ecological Consulting, Grants Pass, OR 97528, USA.
5 Pacific Southwest Research Station, Redding, CA 96002, USA.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: john.sessions{at}oregonstate.edu

Read the Full Text

ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

ADVERTISEMENT

To Advertise     Find Products

Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)