Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
Science Signaling

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 29 October 2004:
Vol. 306. no. 5697, pp. 859 - 862
DOI: 10.1126/science.1101456

Reports

The Evolutionary Origin of Cooperators and Defectors

Michael Doebeli,1* Christoph Hauert,1{dagger} Timothy Killingback2

Coexistence of cooperators and defectors is common in nature, yet the evolutionary origin of such social diversification is unclear. Many models have been studied on the basis of the assumption that benefits of cooperative acts only accrue to others. Here, we analyze the continuous snowdrift game, in which cooperative investments are costly but yield benefits to others as well as to the cooperator. Adaptive dynamics of investment levels often result in evolutionary diversification from initially uniform populations to a stable state in which cooperators making large investments coexist with defectors who invest very little. Thus, when individuals benefit from their own actions, large asymmetries in cooperative investments can evolve.

1 Department of Zoology and Department of Mathematics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada.
2 Department of Mathematics, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA 23187, USA.

{dagger} Present address: Program for Evolutionary Dynamics, Harvard University, One Brattle Square, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: doebeli{at}zoology.ubc.ca

Read the Full Text





ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)