This study examined the effect on the vowel contrast distance (average inter‐vowel distance in the F1−F2 plane) of gradually decreasing the signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) in the auditory feedback of a post‐lingually deafened cochlear implant (CI) user at 1‐month and 1‐year following CI processor activation. Masking noise, mixed with normal levels of speech feedback, was presented through the headpiece of a research sound processor to the CI user. As a control, an analogous procedure was used for a normal‐hearing speaker where the masking noise and speech feedback were delivered over headphones. The SNR was gradually decreased over seven steps as the speakers produced ten repetitions of two vowel contrasts (æ\/[g\/] and i\/u). Speech SPL and vowel contrast distance were measured at all seven masking noise levels. Data from both subjects showed that SPL gradually increased with decreased SNR, while contrast distance decreased. The effect was greater after 1 year of experience with a CI than at 1 month. The effect in the NH speaker was similar to that noted in the CI user after 1 year of experience. Data from additional subjects will be analyzed and reported. [Work supported by NIH Grant No. R01 DC03007.]
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
October 2003
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
October 08 2003
The effect of masking noise on acoustic‐phonetic contrasts in post‐lingually deafened cochlear implant users
Jennell C. Vick;
Jennell C. Vick
Speech Commun. Group, Res. Lab. of Elec., MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139
Search for other works by this author on:
Joseph S. Perkell;
Joseph S. Perkell
Speech Commun. Group, Res. Lab. of Elec., MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139
Search for other works by this author on:
Ellen Stockmann;
Ellen Stockmann
Speech Commun. Group, Res. Lab. of Elec., MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139
Search for other works by this author on:
Majid Zandipour;
Majid Zandipour
Speech Commun. Group, Res. Lab. of Elec., MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139
Search for other works by this author on:
Mark Tiede
Mark Tiede
Yale Univ., New Haven, CT
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 2396 (2003)
Citation
Jennell C. Vick, Joseph S. Perkell, Ellen Stockmann, Majid Zandipour, Harlan Lane, Mark Tiede; The effect of masking noise on acoustic‐phonetic contrasts in post‐lingually deafened cochlear implant users. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 October 2003; 114 (4_Supplement): 2396. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4778115
Download citation file:
13
Views
Citing articles via
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Musical instruments as dynamic sound sources
David Ackermann, Fabian Brinkmann, et al.
A large-scale validation study of aircraft noise modeling for airport arrivals
Thomas C. Rindfleisch, Juan J. Alonso, et al.