Evaluating device design rules based on lithographic capability

Scott P. Warrick; Chris J. Smith; Matt Monroe; Carroll Casteel; Mark Zaleski

doi:10.1117/12.435792

14 September 2001 Evaluating device design rules based on lithographic capability

Scott P. Warrick, Chris J. Smith, Matt Monroe, Carroll Casteel, Mark Zaleski

Proceedings Volume 4346, Optical Microlithography XIV; (2001) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.435792
Event: 26th Annual International Symposium on Microlithography, 2001, Santa Clara, CA, United States

Abstract

This paper demonstrates a method of analysis to determine a minimum achievable overlay design rule, for an existing stepper tool set in a high volume manufacturing fab. Overlay parameters and Critical Dimensions are considered in an overlay budget applying a modified algorithm to the evaluation of reticle errors, tool performance, and design rule analysis. The modified algorithm is used to determine the capability of an installed tool set of high NA steppers to meet the aggressive overlay requirements for advanced BiCMOS device performance. Design rule boundaries and tool set capability are thoroughly investigated. Experimental results from lithographic tests are used in a modified algorithm to determine the capability of running with current design rules or requiring a change for manufacturability. The impact of writing reticles to tighter specifications for both Critical Dimensions and pattern placement are considered. This study provides a method for chip designers and process engineers to determine the lithographic capability of an installed tool set where a part will eventually be fabricated. The results demonstrate that design rules demand optimum tool performance for overlay and CD control as well as provide a tool for the evaluation of continuous improvement.

Citation Download Citation

Scott P. Warrick, Chris J. Smith, Matt Monroe, Carroll Casteel, and Mark Zaleski "Evaluating device design rules based on lithographic capability", Proc. SPIE 4346, Optical Microlithography XIV, (14 September 2001); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.435792

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available