Paper
7 August 2001 Effect of monitor image quality on the soft-copy interpretation of chest CR images
Eliot L. Siegel, Bruce I. Reiner, Frank Hooper, Steven Sevarance, Steven Brower
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Four radiologists independently reviewed eighty individual thoracic computed radiography images. These consisted of 41 normal radiographs and 39 abnormal radiographs. Images were reviewed using 2,048 by 1,536 pixel monitors which varied widely in image quality as documented using a SMPTE pattern. Overall sensitivity for pathology ranged from .94 to .97 for the radiologists and varied minimally (0.95 to 1.0) for the four monitor quality levels tested while specificity varied to a much greater extent for the radiologists (0.68 to 0.93) and for the various monitors (0.76 to 0.93). The control (good quality) monitor demonstrated substantially higher specificity than the other three monitors (which varied from very poor to fair) but there were no significant differences among the non-control monitors despite their wide variance with regard to image quality. There was no significant difference in sensitivity for the monitors (including the control). Additionally no significant differences were found in the level of diagnostic confidence by the radiologists for the four monitors. These findings suggest that the actual effect of monitor quality degradation on clinical accuracy and confidence is complex and correlates poorly with traditional quality assurance metrics performed for these systems. Additional investigation into the monitor characteristics which most affect clinical confidence and performance is warranted.
© (2001) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Eliot L. Siegel, Bruce I. Reiner, Frank Hooper, Steven Sevarance, and Steven Brower "Effect of monitor image quality on the soft-copy interpretation of chest CR images", Proc. SPIE 4323, Medical Imaging 2001: PACS and Integrated Medical Information Systems: Design and Evaluation, (7 August 2001); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.435510
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 6 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Image quality

Radiography

Chest

Diagnostics

Pathology

Picture Archiving and Communication System

Chromium

Back to Top