Skip Navigation

Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society 1999 31(4):457-462; doi:10.1112/S0024609399005822
© 1999 by London Mathematical Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by James, G.
Right arrow Articles by Mathas, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© London Mathematical Society

The Irreducible Specht Modules in Characteristic 2

Gordon James and Andrew Mathas

Imperial College 180 Queen's Gate, London SW7 2BZ
University of Sydney Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia

Received 28 April 1998. Revision received 13 October 1998.

In the representation theory of finite groups, it is useful to know which ordinary irreducible representations remain irreducible modulo a prime p. For the symmetric groups Sn, this amounts to determining which Specht modules are irreducible over a field of characteristic p. Throughout this note we work in characteristic 2, and in this case we classify the irreducible Specht modules, thereby verifying the conjecture in [3, p. 97].

Recall that a partition is 2-regular if all of its non-zero parts are distinct; otherwise the partition is 2-singular. The irreducible Specht modules S{lambda} with {lambda} a 2-regular partition were classified in [2]. Let {lambda}' denote the partition conjugate to {lambda}. If S{lambda} is irreducible, then S{lambda}' is irreducible, since S{lambda}' is isomorphic to the dual of S{lambda} tensored with the sign representation. It turns out that if neither {lambda} nor {lambda}' is 2-regular, then S{lambda} is irreducible only if {lambda} = (2, 2).

In order to state our theorem, we let l(k), for an integer k, be the least non-negative integer such that k < 2l(k). 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification 20C30.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.