Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2019, 67(2), 545-563 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201967020545

Human Capital, Innovation and Internationalization of Micro and Small Enterprises in Rural Territory - a Case Study

Pedro Oliveira1, Jana Turčínková2
1 Department of Social and Organizational Sciences, The Santarém Polytechnic Institute, Complexo Andaluz, Apartado 295, 2001-904 Santarém, Portugal
2 Department of Marketing and Trade, Faculty of Business and Economics, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic

This paper investigates the relationship between human capital in micro and small enterprises and their respective behaviors in innovation and internationalization. Based on a case study of interpretative nature, from 2010 till 2012 we collected data about the agri-food complex of Tagus Valley (Portugal) through triangulation of techniques typically used in qualitative research: direct observation (in farms, units of processing, storage and packaging food stuffs and wines, and regulatory and promotional agents); semi-structured interviews with individuals representing the various categories of agents involved, alongside a survey with 110 business agents; and statistical data gathered in the Portuguese Agriculture Census. Survey data were object of descriptive, correlational and regression analyses. Our research provides evidence of firms making use of stable partnerships with intermediary economic agents and promoting organizations and demonstrating how effective are endogenous assets (especially those of non-mercantile nature) to the competitiveness of a rural territory, in the framework of Common Agricultural Policy. In terms of public policies for competitiveness and innovation, according to an institutional view, the state and regional/local governments, research institutions (public or private), higher education institutions and business training centers, sharing a common agenda for endogenous assets valuation, might play a strategic role in an economy strongly built on micro and small enterprises, whose sustainability depends on collaborative networking.

Keywords: human capital, innovation, internationalization, agri-food cluster

Received: August 31, 2018; Accepted: February 9, 2019; Published: April 29, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Oliveira, P., & Turčínková, J. (2019). Human Capital, Innovation and Internationalization of Micro and Small Enterprises in Rural Territory - a Case Study. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 67(2), 545-563. doi: 10.11118/actaun201967020545
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. ACS, Z., and AUDRETSCH, D. B. 1988. Innovation in Large and Small Firms. The American Economic Review, 78(4): 678-690.
    2. AMIN, A. and THRIFT, N. 1994. Living in the global. In: Amin, A. and Thrift, N. (Eds.). Globalization, institutions and regional development in Europe. Oxford University Press, pp. 2-17.
    3. BECKER, G. S. 1994. Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education. 3rd Edition. National Bureau of Economic Research. Available at: http://papers.nber.org/books/beck94-1
    4. BECKER, G. S. 2002. The age of human capital. [Online]. Available at: http://media.hoover.org/sites/default/files/documents/0817928928_3.pdf [Accessed: 2018, July 15].
    5. BJERKE, L., and JOHANSSON, S. 2015. Patterns of innovation and collaboration in small and large firms. The Annals of Regional Science, 55(1): 222-247. DOI: 10.1007/s00168-015-0712-y Go to original source...
    6. BRUNSWICKER, S., and VANHAVERBEKE, W. 2015. Open Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: External Knowledge Sourcing Strategies and Internal Organizational Facilitators. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(4): 1241-1263. DOI: 10.1111/jsbm.12120 Go to original source...
    7. CAMAGNI, R. 1991. Local 'Milieu', Uncertainty and Innovation Networks: towards a new dynamic theory of economic space. In: CAMAGNI, R. Innovation networks: spatial perspectives. London: Belhaven Press, pp. 121-144. Go to original source...
    8. CAMAGNI, R. 1995. The concept of innovative milieu and its relevance for public policies in European lagging regions. The Journal of the Regional Science Association International, 74(4): 317-340. DOI: 10.1111/j.1435-5597.1995.tb00644.x Go to original source...
    9. CHUNG, S. 1999. Regional Innovation Systems in Korea. In: 3rd International Conference on Technology and innovation Policy: Assessment, Commercialization and Application of Science and Technology and Management of Knowledge. The University of Texas at Austin, USA.
    10. COHEN, W., and KLEPPER, S. 1996. A Reprise of Size and R & D. The Economic Journal, 106: 925-951. DOI: 10.2307/2235365 Go to original source...
    11. EUROSTAT/European Commission. 2014. Community Innovation Survey. Eurostat. [Online]. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/microdata/community-innovation-survey [Accessed: 2018, August 20].
    12. EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2017. Regional Innovation Scoreboard 2017 - Methodology report. Brussel: Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs. Available at: https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/ce38bc9d-5562-11e7-a5ca-01aa75ed71a1/language-en [Accessed: 2018, August 20].
    13. EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2018. What is an SME? European Commission. [Online]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/growth/smes/business-friendly-environment/sme-definition_en [Accessed: 2018, July 15].
    14. EUROSTAT / EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2008. NACE Rev. 2 - Statistical classification of economic activities in the European Community. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3859598/5902521/KS-RA-07-015-EN.PDF [Accessed: 2018, July 15].
    15. EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. 2013. Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001. Available at: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2013/1308/oj [Accessed: 2018, July 15].
    16. FARACE, S. and MAZZOTTA, F. 2015. The Effect of Human Capital and Networks on Knowledge and Innovation in SMEs. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 1(16): 39-71. DOI: 10.3917/jie.016.0039 Go to original source...
    17. FERREIRO, M. F., SOUSA, C. and OLIVEIRA, P. 2015. Governance and innovation in rural territories: a network analysis. In: Actas do VI Congresso de Estudos Rurais. Lisboa: Sociedade Portuguesa de Estudos Regionais. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.15/1386 [Accessed: 2018, July 15].
    18. FLORIDA, R. 1995. Toward the learning region. Futures, 27(5): 527-536. DOI: 10.1016/0016-3287(95)00021-N Go to original source...
    19. FLORIDA, R. 2003. Cities and the Creative Class. City & Community, 2(1): 3-19. DOI: 10.1111/1540-6040.00034 Go to original source...
    20. FRIEDMANN, J. and DOUGLASS, M. 1976. Agropolitan Development: towards a new strategy for regional development in Asia. In: Proceedings of the Seminar on Industrialization Strategies and the Growth Pole Approach to Regional Planning and Development: The Asian Experience. Nagoya: United Nations Centre for Regional Development, pp. 333-387.
    21. Fujita, M., Krugman, P. and Venables, A. 1999. The spatial economy: cities, regions and international trade. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Go to original source...
    22. GU, Q., JIANG, W. and WANG, G. G. 2016. Effects of external and internal sources on innovation performance in Chinese high-tech SMEs: A resource-based perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 40: 76-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2016.04.003 Go to original source...
    23. HIRSCHMAN, A. 1958. The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
    24. JACOBS, J. 1970. The Economy of Cities. Penguin Books, Ltd.
    25. LANDRY, C. 2000. The Creative City - a toolkit for urban innovators. London: Earthscan. Go to original source...
    26. LÖÖF, H. and NABAVI, P. 2015. Knowledge spillovers, productivity and patent. The Annals of Regional Science, 55(1): 249-263. DOI: 10.1007/s00168-015-0681-1 Go to original source...
    27. LUNDVALL, B. 1992. National Systems of Innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London and New York: Printer Publishers.
    28. MORGAN, K. 1997. The Learning Region: Institutions, Innovation and Regional Renewal. Regional Studies, 31(5): 491-503. DOI: 10.1080/00343409750132289 Go to original source...
    29. MUCHNIK, J. 1996. Systèmes agroalimentaires localisés: organisation, innovations et développement. CIRAD: Département des systèmes agroalimentaires et ruraux. Available at: https://agritrop.cirad.fr/575624/1/dk575624.pdf [Accessed: 2016, December 05].
    30. MULLER, P., DEVNANI, S., JULIUS, J., GAGLIARDI, D. and MARZOCCHI, C. 2016. Annual Report on European SMEs 2015/2016. Final report. Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs. Brussels: European Commission.
    31. MYRDAL, G. 1957. Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Regions. New York: Duckworth.
    32. ÖBERG, C. and ALEXANDER, A. T. 2018. The openness of open innovation in ecosystems - integrating innovation and management literature on knowledge linkages. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, In Press. Go to original source...
    33. OECD. 1996. The Knowledge-Based Economy. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
    34. OECD. 2001. The Well-being of Nations: the role of human and social capital. OECD Publishing. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/site/worldforum/33703702.pdf [Accessed: 2016, January 17].
    35. OECD/EUROSTAT. 2005. Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data. 3rd Edition. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264013100-en[Accessed: 2016, January 17]. Go to original source...
    36. OECD. 2007. Human Capital: How what you know shapes your life. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available at: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/human-capital_9789264029095-en [Accessed: 2016, January 17].
    37. OECD. 2011. OECD Regional Typology. Directorate for Public Governance and Territorial Development.
    38. OKSANEN, K. and HAUTAMÄKI, A. 2014. Transforming regions into innovation ecosystems: A model for renewing local industrial structures. The Innovation Journal, 19(2): 5.
    39. OLIVEIRA, P. 2013. A influęncia do meio local nas dinâmicas de inovaçăo do complexo agroalimentar do Vale do Tejo: análise e formulaçăo de estratégias territoriais de açăo coletiva. Lisboa: ISCTE. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/6378 [Accessed: 2016, January 17].
    40. OLIVEIRA, P. M. and NATÁRIO, M. M. 2016a. Territorial innovation systems and strategies of collective efficiency: The case of Tagus Valley agro-food complex. European Journal of Innovation Management, 19(3): 1460-1060. DOI: 10.1108/EJIM-07-2014-0072 Go to original source...
    41. OLIVEIRA, P. and NATÁRIO, M. 2016b. Innovation within a regional agro-food supply chain: the pattern of productive specialization of the Tagus Valley. Egitania Sciencia, 18: 103-123. Go to original source...
    42. PERROUX, F. 1955. Note sur la notion de pôle de croissance. Economie Appliquée, 7(1-2): 307-320. Go to original source...
    43. PORTER, M. 1998. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Nova Iorque: The Free Press. Go to original source...
    44. ROGERS, M. 2004. Networks, Firm Size and Innovation. Small Business Economics, 22: 141-153. DOI: 10.1023/B:SBEJ.0000014451.99047.69 Go to original source...
    45. SCOTT, A. 1996. Regional motors of the global economy. Futures, 28 (5): 391-411. DOI: 10.1016/0016-3287(96)00016-X Go to original source...
    46. STATISTICS PORTUGAL. 2018. Instituto Necional de Estatística / Statistic Portugal. [Online]. Available at: https://www.ine.pt/xportal/xmain?xpgid=ine_main&xpid=INE&xlang=en [Accessed: 2018, June 13].
    47. SULLIVAN, D. 1994. Measuring the Degree of Internationalization of a Firm. Journal of International Business Studies, Jun1994: 325-342. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490203 Go to original source...
    48. TEECE, D. 1988. Technological change and the nature of the firm. In: DOSI, G., FREEMAN, C., NELSON, R. SILVERBERG, G. and SOETE, L. (Eds.). Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter.
    49. TORRE, A. and WALLET, F. 2014. Regional Development and Proximity Relations. London: Edward Elgar. Available at: http://www.andre-torre.com/pdf/PDFpub284N1.pdf [Accessed: 2018, June 13]. Go to original source...
    50. YANG, H., ZHENG, Y. and ZHAO, X. 2014. Exploration or exploitation? Small firms' alliance strategies with large firms. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1): 146-157. DOI: 10.1002/smj.2082 Go to original source...
    51. YIN, R. K. 2014. Case Study Research Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    52. ZUKAUSKAITE, E., TRIPPL, M. AND PLECHERO, M. 2017. Institutional Thickness Revisited. Economic Geography, 93(4): 325-345. DOI: 10.1080/00130095.2017.1331703 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content