Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2019, 67(2), 395-406 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201967020395

Seasonal Correlations Between Heat Stability and Other Raw Bulk Cow Milk Quality Indicators

Oto Hanuš1, Jindřich Čítek2, Jan Říha3, Eva Samková2, Josef Kučera4,5, Gustav Chládek5, Irena Němečková1, Lucie Hasoňová2, Marcela Klimešová1, Petr Roubal1, Radoslava Jedelská1
1 Dairy Research Institute, Ltd., Prague, Ke Dvoru 12a, 160 00 Praha 6 - Vokovice, Czech Republic
2 University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Agriculture, Studentská 809, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic
3 Bentley Czech Ltd., Počernická 96, 108 00 Prague 10, Czech Republic
4 Czech Moravia Breeders Corporation, Benešovská 123, 252 09 Hradištko, Czech Republic
5 Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Agronomy, Department of Animal Breeding, Zemědělská 1665/1, 613 00 Brno-Černá Pole, Czech Republic

Heat milk stability (thermostability, TES) is important technological feature which can contribute to create higher added value in the dairy industry. The aim of this paper was to evaluate the seasonal dynamics and relationships of TES to other milk qality indicators in the results of an exceptionally large data set of bulk samples without technological compositional modification and acidity adjustment, just with native raw cow milk. There were carried out 2,634 of TES measurements including other milk indicators during 3 years under controlled farm conditions. Results were processed by polyfactorial linear model of variance analysis and linear and nonlinear regression method. Correlation indexes of seasonal dependence of milk indicators such as fat content (F), crude protein content (CP), lactose monohydrate concentration (L), solids non-fat content (SNF), total solids (TS), urea concentration (U), F/CP ratio, F/L ratio, milk freezing point (MFP), somatic cell count (SCC), total count of mesophilic microorganisms (TCM) and coli-form bacteria count (COLI) were significant (P < 0.05 and < 0.01) including TES (r = 0.869; P < 0.01), with the exception of F/CP (P > 0.05). The seasonal dynamics of milk TES values corresponds positively with the trends of U and L. The negative seasonal trends are between milk TES and F, CP, SNF, TS, F/CP, F/L and MFP. Significant (P ≤ 0.1) negative seasonal correlations were between TES and F, CP, TS and F/L (-0.56, -0.55, -0.54 and -0.57). Significant (P ≤ 0.05) positive seasonal correlations were between TES and U and TCM (0.62 and 0.58). Insignificant (P > 0.1) negative seasonal correlations were found between TES and SNF, F/CP and MFP (-0.49, -0.29 and -0.16). Insignificant (P > 0.1) positive seasonal correlations were between TES and L, SCC and COLI (0.44, 0.42 and 0.43). Performed explanation of possible effects of chosen factors on raw cow milk TES can allow efficient selection of raw material for its processing by technological treatment under high temperature into relevant dairy products.

Keywords: dairy cow, Czech Fleckvieh, Holstein, environmental and technological factors, protein, urea, somatic cell count
Grants and funding:

This paper was created with the support of the projects NAZV KUS QJ1510339 and MZE RO 1419. Further the authors thank Mr. director Dipl. Eng. Antonín Kolář, Mrs. Bc. Jitka Haňková and Mr. Ladislav Havlas from Bohemilk Opočno, Mr. Dipl. Eng. Jan Zlatníček, Mrs. Dipl. Eng. Zdeňka Klímová and Mr. Zdeněk Motyčka from ČMSCH a.s. for their professional and technical cooperation.

Received: November 30, 2018; Accepted: January 16, 2019; Published: April 29, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Hanuš, O., Čítek, J., Říha, J., Samková, E., Kučera, J., Chládek, G., ... Jedelská, R. (2019). Seasonal Correlations Between Heat Stability and Other Raw Bulk Cow Milk Quality Indicators. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis67(2), 395-406. doi: 10.11118/actaun201967020395
Download citation

References

  1. ALI, A. K. A. and SHOOK, G. E. 1980. An optimum transformation for somatic cells concentration in milk. Journal of Dairy Science, 63: 487-490. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(80)82959-6 Go to original source...
  2. BARŁOWSKA, J., LITWIŃCZUK, Z. and KOWAL, M. 2014. Influence of production season and lactation stage on the technological suitability of milk from cows of various breeds fed in the TMR system. Annals of Animal Science, 14(3): 649-661. DOI: 10.2478/aoas-2014-0039 Go to original source...
  3. BENDELJA, D., PRPIČ, Z., MIKULEC, N., IVKIČ, Z., HAVRANEK, J. and ANTUNAC, N. 2011. Milk urea concentration in Holstein and Simmental cows. Mljekarstvo, 61(1): 45-55.
  4. BERGMANN, J. 1978. Laktosegehalt und Zellzahl in Einzeltierproben. Der Tierzüchter, 31(6): 238-240.
  5. BERGMANN, J. 1979. Der Laktosegehalt von Einzelgemelksproben als Parameter für den Gesundheitzustand des Euters. Aus den Arbeiten des Landeskontrollverbandes Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, pp. 25-34.
  6. ČEJNA, V. 2006. Influence of cow lactation on chosen technological properties of milk. Doctoral Thesis. Brno: Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Agronomy.
  7. FAMIGLI-BERGAMINI, P. 1987. Rapporti tra patologia (non mammaria) ed aspetti quali-quantitativi del latte nella bovina. Societa Italiana di Buiatria Bologna, 19(8-10): 89-99.
  8. FEAGAN, J. T., GRIFFIN, A. T., and LLOYD, G. T. 1966. Effects of subclinical mastitis on heat stability of fluid milk. Journal of Dairy Science, 49: 933-939. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(66)87984-5 Go to original source...
  9. GAJDŮŠEK, S. 1989. The fermentationability, cheeseability and alcohol stability of cow's milk and their relationship to the milk composition. Živočišná Výroba/Czech Journal of Animal Science, 34: 413-422.
  10. GENČUROVÁ, V., HANUŠ, O., BEBER, K., KOPECKÝ, J. and HAVLÍČKOVÁ, K. 1993. Relationship between alcohol stability of cow's milk and some components and factors of primary production. Živočišná Výroba / Czech Journal of Animal Science, 38(9): 837-848.
  11. GODIČ-TORKAR, K. and GOLC-TEGER, S. 2008. The microbiological quality of raw milk after introducing the two day's milk collecting system. Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 92(1): 61-74.
  12. HANUŠ, O., BEBER, K., NECHVÁTAL, R., KOUŘIL, P., GENČUROVÁ, V., KOPECKÝ, J. and GABRIEL, B. 1994. The lactose content and secretion disorders of cow's mammary gland in the milk recording. Výzkum v chovu skotu / Cattle Research, 3: 12-17.
  13. HANUŠ, O., GABRIEL, B., GENČUROVÁ, V. and ŽVÁČKOVÁ, I. 1993. Lactose content in cow milk in the first third of lactation according to some indicators of secretion disorder of mammary gland. Živočišná Výroba / Czech Journal of Animal Science, 38(2): 131-138.
  14. HANUŠ, O., HRONEK, M., HYŠPLER, R., YONG, T., TICHÁ, A., FIKROVÁ, P., HANUŠOVÁ, K., SOJKOVÁ, K., KOPECKÝ, J. and JEDELSKÁ, R. 2010. Relationship between somatic cell count and lactose content in milk of various species of mammals. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 63(2): 87-100. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201058020087 Go to original source...
  15. HANUŠ, O., KUČERA, J., SAMKOVÁ, E., NĚMEČKOVÁ, I., ČÍTEK, J., FALTA, D., HASOŇOVÁ, L., KLIMEŠOVÁ, M., ROUBAL, P. and JEDELSKÁ, R. 2019. Analysis of variance of raw cow milk thermostability under natural and technological conditions of environment. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, in Press.
  16. HANUŠ, O., ROUBAL, P., SAMKOVÁ, E., FALTA, D., CHLÁDEK, G., and VYLETĚLOVÁ - KLIMEŠOVÁ, M. 2013. Cross validation of cut-off limit estimations for milk indicators of subclinical ketosis. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 61(6): 1661-1667. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201361061661 Go to original source...
  17. HANUŠ, O., SAMKOVÁ, E., CHLÁDEK, G., KLIMEŠOVÁ, M., ROUBAL, P., NĚMEČKOVÁ, I., JEDELSKÁ, R. and KOPECKÝ, J. 2018. Raw cow milk thermostability and its relations to other indicators. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 66(5): 1127-1134. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201866051127 Go to original source...
  18. HANUŠ, O., ŽVÁČKOVÁ, I., GENČUROVÁ, V. and GABRIEL, B. 1992. A relationship between milk lactose content and indicators of the mammary gland health in the first third of lactation. Veterinární Medicína (Praha), 37(11): 595-604.
  19. HORNE, D. S. 2016. Ethanol Stability and Milk Composition. In: Mc Sweeny, P. L. H. and O Mahony, J. A. Advanced Dairy Chemistry. Volume 1B, Proteins, Applied Aspects. New York: Springer, pp. 225-246. Go to original source...
  20. HORNE, S. and MUIR, D. 1990. Alcohol and heat stability of milk protein. Journal of Dairy Science, 73(12): 3613-3626. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(90)79064-9 Go to original source...
  21. HORNE, D. S. and PARKER, T. G. 1980. The pH sensitivity of the ethanol stability of individual cow milks. Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal, 34: 126-130.
  22. HORNE, D. S. and PARKER, T. G. 1981. Factors affecting the ethanol stability of bovine milk. II. The origin of pH transition. Journal of Dairy Research, 48: 285-291. DOI: 10.1017/S0022029900021701 Go to original source...
  23. HORNE, D. S. and PARKER, T. G. 1982. Factors affecting the ethanol stability of bovine milk. V. Effects of chemical modification of milk protein. Journal of Dairy Research, 49: 449-457. DOI: 10.1017/S0022029900022585 Go to original source...
  24. HUPPERTZ, T. 2016. Heat Stability of Milk. In: MC SWEENY, P. L. H. and O MAHONY, J. A. Advanced Dairy Chemistry. Volume 1B, Proteins, Applied Aspects. New York: Springer, pp. 179-196. Go to original source...
  25. CHEN, B., GRANDISON, A. S. and LEWIS, M. J. 2015. Effect of seasonal variation on some physical properties and heat stability of milk subjected to ultra-high temperature and in-container sterilisation. Food Chemistry, 181: 227-234. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.02.072 Go to original source...
  26. CHLÁDEK, G. and ČEJNA, V. 2005. Effect of urea content on chemical and technological milk indicators in Holstein dairy cows. In: 1st Milk day [in Czech: Den mléka 1.]. Prague: TIRA s.r.o, pp. 69-70.
  27. CHUNG, I. M., KIM, J. K., LEE, K. J., SON, N. Y., AN, M. J., LEE, J. H., AN, Y. J. and KIM, S. H. 2018. Discrimination of organic milk by stable isotope ratio, vitamin E, and fatty acid profiling combined with multivariate analysis: A case study of monthly and seasonal variation in Korea for 2016-2017. Food Chemistry, 261: 112-123. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.04.017 Go to original source...
  28. CHRAMOSTOVÁ, J., VRZÁKOVÁ, Z., NĚMEČKOVÁ, I. and ČURDA, L. 2014. Heat stability of milk and factors influencing it. Mlékařské listy - zpravodaj, 146: 14-17.
  29. CHRAMOSTOVÁ, J., MÜHLHANSOVÁ, A., BINDER, M., STRMISKA, V., ČURDA, L., HANUŠ, O., KOPECKÝ, J., KLIMEŠOVÁ, M., DRAGOUNOVÁ, H., SEYDLOVÁ, R. and NĚMEČKOVÁ, I. 2016. Heat stability of raw ewe and goat milk. Mlékařské listy - zpravodaj, 27, 157(3): 22-26.
  30. JANŠTOVÁ, B. and NAVRÁTILOVÁ, P. 2014. Instructions for exercises in technology and hygiene of milk and dairy products. Institute of Hygiene and Milk Technology. Textbook. Brno: University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences.
  31. KAILASAPATHY, K. 2008. Chemical composition, physical and functional properties of milk and milk ingredients. In: CHANDAN R. C., KILARA A. and SHAH N. P. (Eds.). Dairy Processing and Quality Assurance. John Wiley & Sons, pp. 75-103. Go to original source...
  32. KASINOS, M., KARBAKHSH, R. R. and VAN DER MEEREN, P. 2015. Sensitivity Analysis of a Small-Volume Objective Heat Stability Evaluation Test for Recombined Concentrated Milk. International Journal of Dairy Technology, 68: 38-43. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0307.12184 Go to original source...
  33. VAN KNEGSEL, A. T. M., VAN DER DRIFT, S. G. A., HORNEMAN, M., DE ROOS, A. P. V., KEMP, B. and GRAAT, G. A. M. 2010. Ketone body concentration in milk determined by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy: Value for the detection of hyperketonemia in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 93: 3065-3069. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2009-2847 Go to original source...
  34. KÖRNER, E., RENNER, E. and SCHMIDT, R. 1977. Zur Ermittlung euterkrankheitsverdächtiger Kühe mit Hilfe der Laktosebestimmung Einzelmilchproben. Archiv Lebensmittel - Hygiene, 28: 161.
  35. LI, Q., MA, Y., HE, S., ELFALLEH, W., XU, W., WANG, J. and QIU, L. 2014. Effect of pH on heat stability of yak milk protein. International Dairy Journal, 35(1): 102-105. DOI: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2013.10.015 Go to original source...
  36. LITWIŃCZUK, Z., BARŁOWSKA, J., MATWIJCZUK, A. and SŁOMIANY, J. 2016. Changes in milk yield and quality during lactation in Polish Red and White-Backed cows included in the genetic resources conservation programme in comparison with the Simmental breed. Annals of Animal Science, 16(3): 871-887. DOI: 10.1515/aoas-2015-0095 Go to original source...
  37. MANZENREITER, H., FÜRST-WALTL, B., EGGER-DANNER, C. and ZOLLITSCH, W. 2013. Zur Eignung des Gehalts an Milchinhaltsstoffen als Ketoseindikator. In: 40th Viehwirtschaftliche Fachtagung. Irdning, 18. - 19. 4. 2013, pp. 9-19.
  38. METWALLI, A. A., ISMAIL, E. A., ALHAJ, O. A., SALEH, K. A. and IBRAHIM, F. S. 2013. The effect of urea and formaldehyde on heat coagulation time (HCT) of camel milk. Life Science Journal, 10(4): 45-50.
  39. MILLER, P. G. and SOMMER H. H. 1940. The coagulation temperature of milk as affected by pH, salts, evaporation and previous heat treatment. Journal of Dairy Science, 23: 405. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(40)95542-4 Go to original source...
  40. PEROUTKOVÁ, J., BINDER, M. and DRBOHLAV, J. 2016. Thermal stability of milk fortified with protein preparations. Mlékařské listy - zpravodaj 27, 158(5): 12-15.
  41. RAJALA-SCHULTZ, P. J. and SAVILLE, W. J. A. 2003. Sources of variation in milk urea nitrogen in Ohio dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science, 86: 1653-1661. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73751-5 Go to original source...
  42. RAYNAL-LJUTOVAC, K., PARK, Y. W., GAUCHERON, F. and BOUHALLAB, S. 2007. Heat stability and enzymatic modifications of goat milk and sheep milk. Small Ruminant Research, 68: 207-220. DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2006.09.006 Go to original source...
  43. RENEAU, J. K. 1986. Effective use of dairy herd improvement somatic cell counts in mastitis control. Journal of Dairy Science, 69: 1708-1720. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(86)80590-2 Go to original source...
  44. RENNER, E., 1972. Möglichkeit der Feststellung von Eutererkrankungen mit dem Infrarot-Milchanalysis (IRMA). Deutsche Molkerei Zeitung, 93(3): 71-75.
  45. RZEWUSKA, K. and STRABEL, T. 2013. Effects of some non-genetic factors on concentration of urea in milk in Polish Holstein-Fresian cows. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences, 22: 197-203. DOI: 10.22358/jafs/65988/2013 Go to original source...
  46. SAS. 2002. SAS Users Guide Ver. 9. Cary, NC: Statistics SAS Institute Inc.
  47. SHARIFI, M., PAHLAVAN, R. and AGHAEI, A. 2017. Economic value and produced milk quality in Holstein lactating cows in organic system. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science, 7(1): 27-35.
  48. SCHNEEBERGER, M. and LEUENBERGER, H. 1981. Relationship of lactose content, somatic cell concentration and California mastitis test in an experimental herd. In: 32nd Annual Meeting of the EAAP. Zagreb.
  49. SIEBERT, F. and PALLAUF, J. 2010. Analyse von Ergebnissen der Milchleistungsprüfung in Hessen im Hinblick auf ein Ketoserisiko. Züchtungskunde, 82: 112-122.
  50. SINGH, H. 2004. Heat stability of milk. International Journal of Dairy Technology, 57: 111-119. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0307.2004.00143.x Go to original source...
  51. STEEN, A., OSTERAS, O. and GRONSTOL, H. 1996. Evaluation of additional acetone and urea analyses, and of the fat-lactose-quotient in cow milk samples in the herd recording system in Norway. Journal of Veterinary Medicine, A43: 181-191. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0442.1996.tb00443.x Go to original source...
  52. SOJKOVÁ, K., HANUŠ, O., ŘÍHA, J., GENČUROVÁ, V., HULOVÁ, I., JEDELSKÁ, R. and KOPECKÝ, J. 2010a. Impacts of lactation physiology at higher and average yield on composition, properties and health indicators of milk in Holstein breed. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica, 41(1): 21-28.
  53. SOJKOVÁ, K., HANUŠ, O., ŘÍHA, J., YONG, T., HULOVÁ, I., VYLETĚLOVÁ, M., JEDELSKÁ, R. and KOPECKÝ, J. 2010b. A comparison of lactation physiology effects at high and lower yield on components, properties and health state indicators of milk in Czech Fleckvieh. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica, 41(2): 84-91.
  54. ŠTĚTINA, J., ČURDA, L., RUBINA, N., KLOJDOVÁ, I., ANUFRIEVA, A. and NĚMEČKOVÁ, I. 2016. Influence of selected phosphates on healt stability of milk and possibilities of its assessment. Mlékařské listy - zpravodaj 27, 159(6): 38-42.
  55. TREVASKIS, L. M. and FULKERSON, W. J. 1999. The relationship between various animal and management factors and milk urea, and its association with reproductive performance of dairy cows grazing pasture. Livestock Production Science, 57: 255-265. DOI: 10.1016/S0301-6226(98)00174-2 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.