Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2013, 61(4), 1041-1049 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201361041041

Factors influencing the imposition of a charge on the entrance to the interpretive trails in the large protected areas

Josef Navrátil1, Kamil Pícha2
1 Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Studentská 13, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic
2 Department of Trade and Tourism, Faculty of Economics, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Studentská 13, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic

The aim of this paper is to assess the relation between the character of the interpretive trail and the imposition of a charge on the entrance. This was done using the discrete choice experiment that involves eight attributes, seven of which are with three levels: the overall character of the trail, the way that the route signs are used in the terrain, the ways of providing information, the length of the trail, the way of the routing, the focus of the trail, and the price of the entrance. There is also one with two levels that involves the existence of the places for rest. The fractional factorial design was used (the orthogonal main effects plan) and the Multinomial Logit Model was used in analyzing the data. The 2,830 choices were done by random sampled visitors from eight tourist locations in the Tourist Regions of the Šumava Mts. and South Bohemia during the summer season 2012. The impact of the character of the trail was especially detected in the model. Except for that, the equipment of the trail and its length have had the fundamental impact on the choice of the trail as well. Those longer and worse equipped trails have a significantly lower degree of utility for the respondents. What is quite surprising is that the respondents refused the ecotourism elements of the interpretive trails, such as the possibility of going through the trail on horseback or the accompaniment of an expert who would provide some comments, as it is common to do this at historical attractions within those sightseeing paths.

Keywords: interpretive trail, tourism, price, entrance fee, South Bohemia
Grants and funding:

The survey as well as the preparation of this paper was supported from the Czech Science Foundation - GACR P404/12/0334 'Factors of visitors' relation to the ambience of attractions in vulnerable areas.'

Received: February 26, 2013; Published: July 13, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Navrátil, J., & Pícha, K. (2013). Factors influencing the imposition of a charge on the entrance to the interpretive trails in the large protected areas. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis61(4), 1041-1049. doi: 10.11118/actaun201361041041
Download citation

References

  1. ANGELINI, R., SIMIĂO FERREIRA, J., SANTIAGO DO CARMO ARAÚJO, C., and ROSA CARVALHO, A., 2011: Effect of outdoor and laboratorial environment science activities on middle school students understanding on conservation. Natureza a Conservacao, 9, 1: 93-98. ISSN 1679-0073. DOI: 10.4322/natcon.2011.012 Go to original source...
  2. APOSTOLAKIS, A. and JAFFRY, S., 2005a: A choice modeling application for Greek heritage attractions. Journal of Travel Research, 43, 3: 309-318. ISSN 0047-2875. DOI: 10.1177/0047287504272035 Go to original source...
  3. APOSTOLAKIS, A. and JAFFRY, S., 2005b: Stated preferences for two Cretan heritage attractions. Annals of Torism Research, 32, 4: 985-1005. ISSN 0160-7383. Go to original source...
  4. BATEMAN, I. J., CARSON, R. T., DAY, B., HANEMANN, M., HANLEY, N., HETT, T. JONES-LEE, M. et al., 2002: Economic valuation with stated preference techniques. 1st ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 458 p. ISBN 1 84064 919 4. Go to original source...
  5. BRAITHWAITE, R. W. and LEIPER, N., 2010: Contests on the River Kwai: how a wartime tragedy became a recreational, commercial and nationalistic plaything. Current Issues in Tourism, 13, 4: 311-332. ISSN 1368-3500. DOI: 10.1080/13683500903249312 Go to original source...
  6. BUSHELL, R., STAIFF, R., and EAGLES, P. F. J., 2007: Tourism and protected areas: Benefits beyond boundaries. In: BUSHELL, R. and EAGLES, P. F. J. (eds.), Tourism and protected areas: Benefits beyond boundaries, The Vth IUCN World Parks Congress. Wallingford: CABI. pp. 1-11. ISBN 978-0-8519-022-4. Go to original source...
  7. CECIONI, E., 2005: Environmental education and geography of complexity. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 14, 4: 277-294. ISSN 1038-2046. DOI: 10.1080/10382040508668360 Go to original source...
  8. CETKOVSKÝ, S., KLUSÁČEK, P., MARTINÁT, S. and ZAPLETALOVÁ, J., 2007: Some aspects of cross-border cooperation in Euroregions of the Czech Republic: An example of the Šumava Region. Moravian Geographical Reports, 15, 1: 43-55. ISSN 1210-8812.
  9. CLARK, G., 1997: The educational value of the rural trail: a short walk in the Lancashire countryside. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 21, 3: 349-362. ISSN 0309-8265. Go to original source...
  10. DANTZLER, D. W., GERING, L. R., STRAKA, T. J. and YARROW, G. K., 2008: Creating a destination for tourism, recreation, and education on an active solid waste landfill site. Natural Areas Journal, 28, 4: 410-413. ISSN 0885-8608. DOI: 10.3375/0885-8608(2008)28[410:CADFTR]2.0.CO;2 Go to original source...
  11. DCR, 2012: Trails guidelines and best practices manual. [online] URL: [2012-02-01].
  12. EPLER WOOD, M., 2002: Ecotourism: Principles, practices and policies for sustainability. 1st ed. UNEP: Nairobi, 64 p. ISBN 92-807-2064-3.
  13. EETAP, 2002: Educational use of nature trails. EETAP Resource Library, 105. [online] URL: [cit. 2010-12-30].
  14. FERREIRA, G., 1998: Environmental education through hiking: A qualitative investigation. Environmental Education Research, 4, 2: 177-183. ISSN 1350-4622. DOI: 10.1080/1350462980040205 Go to original source...
  15. FORET, M. and KLUSÁČEK, P., 2011: The importance of the partnership and cooperation in the regional development exampled on Znojmo region. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 59, 4: 79-85. ISSN 1211-8516. Go to original source...
  16. GREENE, W. H., 2007: NLOGIT version 4.0. Reference guide. Plainview: Econometric software, Inc.
  17. GYŐRI, E., 2010: The Establishment of the Principles of Sustainable Tourism in the Balaton Region. Deturope, 2, 1: 46-64. ISSN 1821-2506. Go to original source...
  18. HALL, C. M. and LEW, A. A., 2009: Understanding and managing tourism impacts: An integrated approach. 1st ed. London and New York: Routledge, 365 p. ISBN 978-0-415-77133-7. Go to original source...
  19. HENSHNER, D. A., ROSE, J. M., and GREENE, W. H. 2005: Applied choice analysis: A primer. 1st ed. Cambridge: Camridge University Press, 717 p. ISBN 978-0-251-60577-9
  20. HOLDEN, A., 2008: Environment and Tourism. 2nd ed. London and New Yourk: Routledge, 274 p. ISBN 978-0-415-39955-5.
  21. HOLLÝ, K., 2003: Jezdecká turistika. 1. vyd. Ostrava: Montanex, a. s., 109 s. ISBN 80-7225-104-X.
  22. HRABÁNKOVÁ, M. and BOHÁČKOVÁ, I., 2007: Conditions of sustainable development in the Czech Republic in compliance with the recommendation of the European Commission - Scientific information. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 53, 6: 285-289. ISSN 0139-570X. Go to original source...
  23. HUGHES, K., 2013: Measuring the impact of viewing wildlife: do positive intentions equate to long-term changes in conservation behaviour? Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 21, 1: 42-59. ISSN 0966-9582. DOI: 10.1080/09669582.2012.681788 Go to original source...
  24. HUGHES, M. and MORRISON-SAUNDERS, A., 2002: Impact of trail-side interpretive signs on visitor knowledge. Journal of Ecotourism, 1, 2-3:122-132. ISSN 1472-4049. DOI: 10.1080/14724040208668119 Go to original source...
  25. JUGULUM, R. and SAUL, P., 2010: Design for Lean Six Sigma: A holistic approach to design and innovation. 1st ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 320 p. ISBN 9780470007518.
  26. KELLY, J., HAIDER, W., WILLIAMS, P. W., and EGLUND, K., 2007: Stated preferences of tourists for eco-efficient destination planning options. Tourism Management, 28, 2: 377-390. ISSN 0261-5177 DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2006.04.015 Go to original source...
  27. KOSKI, A.E., 2005: Pond rehabilitation and establishment of a site-based environmental education curriculum. 22nd American Society of Mining and Reclamation Annual National Conference. Brackenridge: American Society of Mining and Reclamation. 2005, 2, pp. 645-653. ISBN 978-1-62276-086-2. Go to original source...
  28. LEUNG, Y.-F., 2012: Recreation ecology research in East Asia's protected areas: Redefining impacts? Journal for Nature Conservation, 20, 6: 349-356. ISSN 1617-1381. DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2012.07.005 Go to original source...
  29. MARTINÁT, S., FRANTÁL, B., KLUSÁČEK, P. and KLAPKA, P., 2009: New rural spaces: Conflicts, opportunities and challenges. Moravian Geographical Reports, 17, 4: 44-45. ISSN 1210-8812.
  30. NAVRÁTIL, J., KNOTEK, J., ŠVEC, R., PÍCHA, K., a NAVRÁTILOVÁ, J., 2011: Návštěvnické preference naučných stezek ve velkoplošně chráněných územích. Czech Hospitality and Tourism Papers, 8, 14: 3-16. ISSN 1801-1535.
  31. NAVRÁTIL, J., PÍCHA, K. and HŘEBCOVÁ, J., 2010: The importance of historical monuments for domestic tourists: The case of South-western Bohemia (Czech Republic). Moravian Geographical Reports, 18, 1: 45-61. ISSN 1210-8812.
  32. NAVRÁTIL, J., PÍCHA, K. and MARTINÁT, S., 2012: Spatial differentiation of the interpretive nature trails in the large-area protected natural territories. Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis Facultas Rerum Naturalium, Geographica, 43, 2: 101-115. ISSN 1212-2157.
  33. NAVRÁTIL, J., PÍCHA, K. and NAVRÁTILOVÁ, J., 2012: Satisfaction with visit to tourism attractions. Tourism, 60, 4: 411-430. ISSN 1332-7461.
  34. NOVINKY, 2010: Šumava se má opět otevřít turistům, rozhodl soud. [online] URL: [2011-12-05].
  35. PEREIRA, M. B., FERREIRA, A. C. and ROCHA, L. C., 2012: Trilha Interpretativa Geoturística na Serra de Săo José no Entorno da Estrada Real / MG. Anuario do Instituto de Geociencias, 35, 1: 165-172. ISSN 0101-9759. DOI: 10.11137/2012_1_165_172 Go to original source...
  36. PRAH, K. and KOLNIK, K. K., 2007: Didactic analysis of outdoor learning based on the example of the educational water trail in the Sotla river basin. Didactica slovenica-Pedagoška obzorja, 22, 3-4: 38-52. ISSN 0353-1392.
  37. RITCHIE, J. R. B. and CROUCH, G. I., 2003: The competitive destination: A sustainable tourism perspective. 1st ed. Oxon: CABI Publishing, 272 p. ISBN 0-85199-664-7.
  38. ROGERSON, M. C., 2007: Tourism routes as vehicles for local economic development in South Africa: The example of the Magaliesberg Meander. Urban Forum, 18, 2: 49-68. ISSN 1015-3802. DOI: 10.1007/s12132-007-9006-5 Go to original source...
  39. STREET, D. J., BURGESS, L. and LOUVIERE, J. L., 2005: Quick and easy choice sets: Constructing optimal and nearly optimal stated choice experiments. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 22, 4: 459-470. ISSN 0167-8116. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2005.09.003 Go to original source...
  40. TOPOLE, M., 2009: Potential for tourism in the demographically threatened region of Jurklošter. Acta Geographica Slovenica, 49, 1: 119-141. ISSN 1581-6613. DOI: 10.3986/AGS49104 Go to original source...
  41. VON HIRNSCHALL, F., TOMEK, H., BRANDENBURG, C., REIMOSER, F., LEXER, W., HECKL, F. and ZIENER, K., 2012: Effects of recreation and tourism in large protection areas - spatial and temporal patterns of mountain bikers and their effects on the fauna in the biosphere reserve "wienerwald". Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung, 44, 11: 341-347. ISSN 0940-6808.
  42. VYSTOUPIL, J., ŠAUER, M., HOLEŠINSKÁ, A., KUNC, J., SEIDENGLANZ, D., a TONEV, P., 2011: Geografie cestovního ruchu České republiky. Plzeň: Aleš Čeněk, 318 s. ISBN 978-80-7380-340-7.
  43. WEAVER, D., 2006: Sustainable tourism. 1st ed. London and New York: Routledge, 240 p. ISBN 978-0-7506-6438-7.
  44. ZGŁOBICKI, W., KOTODYŃSKA-GAVVRYSIAK, R., GAWRYSIAK, Ł. and PAWŁOWSKI, A., 2012: Walory geoturystyczne rzeźby lessowej zachodniej części Wyżyny Lubelskiej. Przeglad Geologiczny, 60, 1: 26-31. ISSN 0033-2151

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.