Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T20:34:44.585Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Failed Governance: A Comment on Baker and Griffith's Ensuring Corporate Misconduct

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

This essay evaluates Baker and Griffith's book, Ensuring Corporate Misconduct, as a contribution to the social science literatures on regulation and governance, risk, and insurance. Previous social science work on insurance often took an “insurance on the ground” perspective comparing how insurance actually works with the theory of insurance and scrutinizing the actions of insurers as well as the actions of their policyholders. In line with this perspective, Baker and Griffith find that directors and officers (D&O) insurers do not actually charge premiums that vary with risk or monitor the actions of the officers and directors covered by the insurance. Because insurers and governments share governance tasks (a point Baker makes elsewhere), insurers' failures in fact amount to “failed governance” of the corporate world.

Type
Review Essay
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Kenneth W., and Snidal, Duncan. 2000. Hard and Soft Law in International Governance. International Organizations 54:421456.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth. 1963. Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care. American Economic Review 53:941973.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth. 1971. Essays in the Theory of Risk Bearing. Chicago, IL: Markham.Google Scholar
Baker, Tom. 1996. On the Genealogy of Moral Hazard. Texas Law Review 75:237292.Google Scholar
Baker, Tom. 2001. Blood Money, New Money, and the Moral Economy of Tort Law in Action. Law and Society Review 35:275319.Google Scholar
Baker, Tom. 2010. Insurance in Sociolegal Research. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 6:433447.Google Scholar
Baker, Tom, and McElrath, Karen. 1996. Whose Safety Net? Home Insurance and Inequality. Law & Social Inquiry 21:229264.Google Scholar
Baker, Tom, and Simon, Jonathan, eds. 2002. Embracing Risk: The Changing Culture of Insurance and Responsibility. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John, Coglianese, Cary, and Levi-Faur, David. 2007. Editors' Introduction: Can Regulation and Governance Make a Difference? Regulation and Governance 1:17.Google Scholar
Carrigan, Christopher, and Coglianese, Cary. 2011. The Politics of Regulation: From New Institutionalism to New Governance. Annual Review of Political Science 14:107129.Google Scholar
Clarke, Lee. 1999. Mission Improbable: Using Fantasy Documents to Tame Disaster. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
de Búrca, Gráinne, and Scott, Joanne, eds. 2006. Law and New Governance in the EU and the US. Portland, OR: Hart.Google Scholar
Ericson, Richard V., Barry, Dean, and Doyle, Aaron. 2000. The Moral Hazards of Neo-Liberalism: Lessons from the Private Insurance Industry. Economy and Society 29:532558.Google Scholar
Ericson, Richard V., Doyle, Aaron, and Barry, Dean. 2003. Insurance as Governance. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1974. Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change. Law and Society Review 9:95160.Google Scholar
Haufler, Virginia. 1999. Self-Regulation and Business Norms: Political Risk, Political Activism. In Private Authority and International Affairs, ed. Cutler, A. Claire, Haufler, Virginia, and Porter, Tony, 199222. Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
Heimer, Carol A. 1982. The Racial and Organizational Origins of Insurance Redlining. Journal of Intergroup Relations 10 (3): 4260.Google Scholar
Heimer, Carol A. 1985. Reactive Risk and Rational Action: Managing Moral Hazard in Insurance Contracts. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Heimer, Carol A. 2002. Insuring More, Ensuring Less: The Costs and Benefits of Private Regulation Through Insurance. In Embracing Risk, ed. Baker, Tom and Simon, Jonathan, 116145. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heimer, Carol A. 2003. Insurers as Moral Actors. In Risk and Morality, ed. Ericson, Richard V. and Doyle, Aaron, 284316. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
O'Malley, Patrick. 1991. Legal Networks and Domestic Security. Studies in Law, Politics and Society 11:171190.Google Scholar
O'Malley, Patrick. 2002. Imagining Insurance: Risk, Thrift, and Life Insurance in Britain. In Embracing Risk, ed. Baker, Tom and Simon, Jonathan, 97115. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Perrow, Charles. [1984] 1999. Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenau, James N., and Czempiel, Ernst-Otto. 1992. Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, H. Laurence. 1970. Settled Out of Court: The Social Process of Insurance Claims Adjustment. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles F., and Simon, William H. 2011–2012. Minimalism and Experimentalism in the Administrative State. Georgetown Law Journal 100:5393.Google Scholar
Schneiberg, Marc. 2002. Organizational Heterogeneity and the Production of New Forms: Politics, Social Movements and Mutual Companies in American Fire Insurance, 1900–1930. Research in the Sociology of Organizations 19:3989.Google Scholar
Simon, Jonathan. 1988. The Ideological Effects of Actuarial Practices. Law and Society Review 22:771800.Google Scholar
Squires, Gregory D., ed. 1997. Insurance Redlining: Disinvestment, Reinvestment, and the Evolving Role of Financial Institutions. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
Squires, Gregory D., DeWolfe, Ruthanne, and DeWolfe, Alan S. 1979. Urban Decline or Disinvestment: Uneven Development, Redlining, and the Role of the Insurance Industry. Social Problems 27:7995.Google Scholar
Vaughan, Diane. 1996. The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Vogel, David. 2008. Private Global Business Regulation. Annual Review of Political Science 11:261282.Google Scholar
Zelizer, Viviana Rotman, A. 1979. Morals and Markets: The Development of Life Insurance in the United States. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar