Abstract
CONTEXT: Studies showing that physicians often interrupt the patient’s opening statement assume that this compromises data collection.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the association between such interruptions and physician accuracy in identifying patient concerns.
DESIGN: This study replicates the Beckman-Frankel methodology and adds exit interviews to assess physician understanding. The authors audiotaped a convenience sample of 70 encounters and surveyed both parties following the visit.
SETTING: A community-based ambulatory clinic.
PARTICIPANTS: Internal medicine residents (77%) and attending physicians and their adult, English-speaking patients who were primarily low income and ethnic minority.
OUTCOME MEASURE: The Index of Understanding measures patientphysician problem list concordance. It is the percentage of patient problems, obtained on exit, that the physician correctly identifies.
RESULTS: In 26% of the visits, patients were allowed to complete their agenda without interruption; in 37% the physicians interrupted; and in 37% no inquiry about agenda was made in the first 5 minutes. Neither physician experience nor their assessment of time pressure or medical difficulty was associated with these rates. Exit interviews showed no significant difference in Index of Understanding between those involving completion of agenda (84.6%) and those involving patient interruption (82.4%) (P=.83). But when the physician did not solicit an agenda, the concordance was 59.2%, significantly lower than either the completion (P=.014) or the interruption group (P=.013).
CONCLUSION: Interruption as defined by Beckman-Frankel does not curtail ability to identify patient concerns, but failure to ask for the patient’s agenda associates with a 24% reduction in physician understanding.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Folger J, Poole MS. Relational coding schemes: the question of validity. In Poole MS, ed., Communication Yearbook 5. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications; 1982.
Zoppi K, Epstein RM. Is communication a skill? Communication behaviors and being in relation. Fam Med. 2002;34:319–24.
Stewart M, Brown JB, Donner A, et al. The impact of patient-centered care on patient outcomes. J Fam Pract. 2000;49:796–804.
Street RL. Analyzing communication in medical consultations: do behavioral measures correspond to patients’ perceptions? Med Care. 1992;30:976–88.
Beckman HB, Frankel RM. The effect of physician behavior on the collection of data. Ann Intern Med. 1984;101:692–6.
Marvel MK, Epstein RM, Flowers K, Beckman H. Soliciting the patient’s agenda: have we improved? JAMA. 1999;281:283–7.
White J, Levinson W, Rotor D. “Oh, by the way...”: the closing moments of the medical visit. J Gen Intern Med. 1994;9:24–8.
Kroenke K. Patient expectations for care: how hidden is the agenda? Mayo Clinic Proc. 1998;73:191–3. Editorial.
Quill TE. Partnerships in patient care: a contractual approach. Ann Intern Med. 1983;95:228–34.
Lipkin M Jr. The medical interview. In Lipkin M, Putnam SM, Lazare A, eds., Behavioral Medicine in Primary Care: A Practical Guide. Stamford, CT: Appleton & Lange; 1997:1–7.
Kern DE, Grayson M, Barker LR, et al. Residency training in interviewing skills and the psychosocial domain of medical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 1989;4:421–31.
Rosenberg EE, Lussier M, Beaudoin C. Lessons for clinicians from physician-patient communication literature. Arch Fam Med. 1997;6:279–83.
Anderson H. A reflection on client-professional collaboration. Fam Syst Health. 1996;14:193–206.
Smith RC. The Patient’s Story: An Evidence-based Method, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001.
Mauksch LB, Hillenburg L, Robins L. The establishing focus protocol: training for collaborative agenda setting and time management in the medical interview. Fam Syst Health. 2001;19:147–57.
Press I. Patient satisfaction with the outpatient experience. How does your organization measure up? Healthc Exec. 2003;18:94–5.
Frieden RB, Goldman L, Cecil RR. Patient-physician concordance in problem identification in the primary care setting. Ann Intern Med. 1980;93:490–3.
Feinstein AR. Principles of Medical Statistics. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2002.
Eisenthal S, Emery R, Lazare A, Udin H. “Adherence” and the negotiated approach to patienthood Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1979;36:393–8.
Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Ware JE. Assessing the effects of physician-patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease. Med Care. 1989;27(suppl 3):S110-S127.
Dugdale DC, Epstein R, Pantilat SZ. Time and the patient-physician relationship. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14(suppl 1):S34-S40.
Miller SH. Compliance with treatment regimens in chronic asymptomatic diseases. Am J Med. 1997;102(2A):43–9.
Bass MJ, Buck C, Turner L, Dickie G, Pratt G, Robinson HG. The physician’s actions and the outcome of illness in family practice. J Fam Pract. 1986;23:43–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
There are no conflicts of interest to report for any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dyche, L., Swiderski, D. The effect of physician solicitation approaches on ability to identify patient concerns. J GEN INTERN MED 20, 267–270 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.40266.x
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.40266.x