Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cost-related skipping of medications and other treatments among medicare beneficiaries between 1998 and 2000

Results of a national study

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report rates of cost-related skipping of medications and other treatments, assess correlates of skipping, examine changes in skipping between 1998 and 2000, and identify factors associated with changes in skipping.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of surveys of a probability sample of Medicare beneficiaries in 13 states in 1998 and 2000.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Self-reported rates of skipping medications and other treatments.

RESULTS: Cost-related skipping rates increased from 9.5% in 1998 to 13.1% in 2000. In separate multivariable models using 1998 and 2000 data, higher out-of-pocket costs, lower physician-patient relationship quality, low income, and lacking prescription drug coverage were associated with more skipping (P<.05 for all). Better physical and mental health, and greater age were associated with less skipping (P<.05). HMO membership was not associated with higher rates of skipping in 1998 (P=.84), but was in 2000 (P<.0004). In longitudinal analyses, increased medication costs and HMO membership were associated with the observed increase cost-related skipping between 1998 and 2000.

CONCLUSIONS: Cost-related skipping was associated with several factors, including drug coverage, poverty, poor health, and physician-patient relationship quality. The important role of physician-patient relationships in cost-related skipping has not been shown previously. Physicians should be aware of these risk factors for cost-related skipping, and initiate dialogue about problems paying for prescription medications and other treatments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Myers LB, Midence K. Concepts and issues in adherence. In: Myers LB, Midence K, eds. Adherence to Treatment in Medical Conditions. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers; 1998:1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shumaker SA, Schron EB, Ockene JK, McBee WL, eds. The Handbook of Health Behavior Change. 2nd ed. New York: Springer Publishing Company, Inc.; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Haynes RB. Strategies to improve compliance with referrals, appointments, and prescribed medical regimens. In: Haynes RB, Taylor DW, Sackett DL, eds. Compliance in Health Care. Baltimore, Md: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 1979:121–43.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Poisal JA, Murray L. Growing differences between Medicare beneficiaries with and without drug coverage. Health Aff (Millwood). 2001;20:74–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stuart B, Grana J. Ability to pay and the decision to medicate. Med Care. 1998;36:202–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Blustein J. Drug coverage and drug purchases by Medicare beneficiaries with hypertension. Health Aff (Millwood). 2000;19:219–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Adams AS, Soumerai SB, Ross-Degnan D. Use of antihypertensive drugs by Medicare enrollees: does type of drug coverage matter? Health Aff (Millwood). 2001;20:276–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lillard LA, Rogowski J, Kington R. Insurance coverage for prescription drugs: effects on use and expenditures in the Medicare population. Med Care. 1999;37:926–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Department of Health & Human Services. Report to the President: Prescrition Drug Coverage, Spending, Utilization, and Prices. 2000. http://www.aspe.hhs.gov/health/reports/drugstudy.

  10. Mojtabai R, Olfson M. Medication costs, adherence, and health outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries. Health Aff (Millwood). 2003;22:220–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Heisler M, Langa KM, Eby EL, Fendrick AM, Kabeto MU, Piette JD. The health effects of restricting prescription medication use because of cost. Med Care. 2004;42:626–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Piette JD, Heisler M, Wagner TH. Cost-related medication underuse among chronically ill adults: the treatments people forgo, how often, and who is at risk. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:1782–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Safran DG, Neuman P, Schoen C, et al. Prescription drug coverage and seniors: how well are states closing the gap. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002;W253–67.

  14. Steinman MA, Sands LP, Covinsky KE. Self-restriction of medications due to cost in seniors without prescription coverage. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:793–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Safran DG, Wilson IB, Rogers WH, Montgomery JE, Chang H. Primary care quality in the Medicare Program: comparing the performance of Medicare health maintenance organizations and traditional fee-for-service medicare. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:757–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dillman DA. Mail and Telephone Surveys: the Total Design Method. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Aday LA, Andersen R. Development of Indices of Access to Medical Care. Ann Arbor, Mich: Health Administration Press; 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Andersen RM. A Behavioral Model of Families’ Use of Health Services, Research Series No. 25. Chicago, Ill: Center for Health Administration Studies, University of Chicago; 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Safran DG, Kosinski M, Tarlov AR, et al. The primary care assessment survey: tests of data quality and measurement performance. Med Care. 1998;36:728–39.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Murphy J, Chang H, Montgomery JE, Rogers WH, Safran DG. The quality of physician-patient relationships. Patients’ experiences 1996–1999. J Fam Pract. 2001;50:123–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. National Center for Health Statistics. Current Estimates from the National Health Interview Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Government; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  22. McHorney CA, Ware JEJ, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993;31:247–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jones MP. Indicator and stratification methods for missing explanatory variables in multiple linear regression. J Am Stat Assoc. 1996;91:222–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Greene WH. Econometric Analysis 1993. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Safran DG. Defining the future of primary care: what can we learn from patients? Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:248–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Report to the Congress: Selected Medicare Issues. Washington, DC: Medicare Payment Advisory Commission; 2000.

  27. Pear R. 17 percent increase in prescription drug costs hit elderly hardest, study finds. The New York Times. June 27, 2002.

  28. Strunk BC, Ginsburg PB, Gabel JR. Tracking health care costs. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002;(suppl):W39–50.

  29. Connolly C. Pharmaceutical spending continues stady increase: a few heavily advertised and high-priced “blockbuster” medications drive 17 percent increase. Washington Post. March 29, 2002:09.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Achman L, Gold M. Trends in Medicare+Choice: Benefits and Premiums, 1999–2002. New York, NY: The Commonwealth Fund; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Alexander GC, Casalino LP, Meltzer DO. Patient-physician communication about out-of-pocket costs. JAMA. 2003;290:953–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Piette JD, Heisler M, Wagner TH. Cost-related medication underuse: do patients with chronic illnesses tell their doctors? Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1749–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Maxwell S, Baseggio C. Outpatient Therapy Services Under Medicare: Background and Policy Issues. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. JAMA. 2002;288:2981–97.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ira B. Wilson MD, MSc.

Additional information

This research was supported by grant number R01 HS09622 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the National Institute on Aging.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilson, I.B., Rogers, W.H., Chang, H. et al. Cost-related skipping of medications and other treatments among medicare beneficiaries between 1998 and 2000. J Gen Intern Med 20, 715–720 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0128.x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0128.x

Key words

Navigation