Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T07:25:52.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Dilemmas of Good Governance: A Latin American Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

George Philip
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

DURING THE 1990S, THE INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS (IFIS) have gone beyond supporting free-market economics via the socalled Washington consensus which advocated primarily marketoriented reform, to adopt a broader notion of ‘good governance’ which includes political as well as economic factors. The World Bank's Development Report 1997; The State in a Changing World is a key document in explaining this new thinking. It lays out the desirability of democracy, the rule of law and effective democratic regulation alongside the market-oriented economic policies and fiscal orthodoxy which IFIs have long advocated. There is no doubt that governance matters to development and to that extent the Report is welcome. The Report also makes a number of worthwhile points about administrative good practice and reform. However some scepticism is in order too. This is because the Bank's notion of ‘good governance’ is too idealistic, insufficiently historically specific and over-confident in respect of what we do know and can know about the politics of development.

Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , April 1999 , pp. 226 - 242
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The components of the ‘Washington consensus’ are listed in Williamson, J. (ed.), Latin American Adjustment: How Much has Happened?, Washington DC, Institute for International Economics, 1990.Google Scholar

2 World Bank, World Development Report 1997, Oxford University Press, 1997.

3 See the special issue of Third World Quarterly, 17:4 (Autumn 1996).

4 For a relevant case study of Argentina see Phillips, N. J., ‘Globalisation and State Power: Political and Economic Reform in Argentina 1989–95,’ PhD thesis, University of London, 1998.Google Scholar

5 Painter, J., Bolivia and Coca: A Study of Dependency, United Nations University, 1994.Google Scholar

6 See, for example, Edwards, S., Crisis and Reform in Latin America: From Despair to Hope, pubd for World Bank by Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

7 Phillips, ‘Globalisation’.

8 See the somewhat polemical but well‐researched account by Caufield, C., Masters of Illusion: the World Bank and the Poverty of Nations, Macmillan, Basingstoke, 1996.Google Scholar

9 Inter‐American Development Bank, Latin America after a Decade of Reforms: Economic and Social Progress. 1997 Report, IADB, 1997.

10 For example, Edwards, , Crisis and Reform in Latin America.Google Scholar

11 Sznajder, M., ‘Dilemmas of Economic and Political Modernisation in Chile; A Jaguar that wants to be a Puma.’Third World Quarterly, 17:4 (1996), pp. 725–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12 Jones, M. P., ‘Evaluating Argentina’s Presidential Democracy 1983–1995’, in Mainwaring, S. and Shugart, M. (eds), Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

13 World Bank, 1998 Report, p. 78.

14 Clapham, C., ‘Liberalisation, Regionalism and Statehood in the New Development Agenda’, Third World Quarterly, 17:4 (Autumn 1996) pp. 593–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar For a related point see Evans, P., Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation, Princeton NJ, Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

15 For a related argument see Weyland, K., ‘Neo‐Populism and Neo‐Liberalism in Latin America; Unexpected Affinities’, unpublished ILAS Conference Paper, London, 1996.Google Scholar

16 For example, the four‐volume work of Schmitter, P., O’Donnell, G. and Whitehead, L. A. (eds), Transitions to Democracy, Baltimore MD, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

17 See, among other works, Angell, A. and Graham, C., ‘Can Social Sector Reform Make Adjustment Stable and Equitable? Lessons from Chile and Venezuela’, Journal of Latin American Studies, 27:1 (1995) pp. 189–219.Google Scholar

18 See the famous critique by O’Donnell, G. in ‘Delegative Democracy’, Journal of Democracy, 5:1 (1994).Google Scholar

19 Costa, E. Ferrero, ‘Peru’s Presidential Coup’, Journal of Democracy, 4:1 (1993).Google Scholar