Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A 2020 vision of patient-centered primary care

Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Patient-centered care has received new prominence with its inclusion by the Institute of Medicine as 1 of the 6 aims of quality. Seven attributes of patient-centered primary care are proposed here to improve this dimension of care: access to care, patient engagement in care, information systems, care coordination, integrated and comprehensive team care, patient-centered care surveys, and publicly available information. The Commonwealth Fund 2003 National Survey of Physicians and Quality of Care finds that one fourth of primary care physicians currently incorporate these various patient-centered attributes in their practices. To bring about marked improvement will require a new system of primary care payment that blends monthly patient panel fees with traditional fee-for-service payment, and new incentives for patient-centered care performance. A major effort to test this concept, develop a business case, provide technical assistance and training, and diffuse best practices is needed to transform American health care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century, Vol. 6. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davis K, Schoen C, Schoenbaum SC. A 2020 vision of American health care. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:3357–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gerteis M, Edgman-Levitan S, Daley J, Delbanco TL. Through the Patient’s Eyes: Understanding and Promoting Patient-Centered Care. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Delbanco TL, Berwick DM, Boufford JL, et al. Healthcare in a land called peoplepower: nothing about me without me. Health Expect. 2001;4:144–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Berwick D. Escape Fire. New York: The Commonwealth Fund; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Earnest MA, Ross SE, Moore LA, Wittevrongel L, Lin CT. Use of a patient-accessible medical record in a practice for congestive heart failure: patient and physician experiences. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004;11:410–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ross SE, Moore LA, Earnest MA, Wittevrongel L, Lin CT. Providing an online medical record to patients with congestive heart failure: a randomized trial. J Med Internet Res. 2004;6:el 2.

  8. Audet AM, Doty MM, Shamasdin J, Schoenbaum SC. Physicians’ Views on Quality of Care: Findings from the Commonwealth Fund National Survey of Physicians and Quality of Care. New York: The Commonwealth Fund; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wasson JH, Benjamin R. How’s Your Health? What You Can do to Make Your Health and Health Care Better. New Hampshire: FNX Corporation; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shelton L, Aiuppa L, Torda P. Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Physician Directory Information on the Internet. New York: The Commonwealth Fund; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Peterson M. The Institute of Medicine Report. A manpower policy for primary health care: a commentary from the American College of Physicians. Introduction and discussion. Ann Intern Med. 1980;84:843–51.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Institute of Medicine. Primary Care: America’s Health in a New Era. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Starfield B. Primary Care: Balancing Health Needs, Services, and Technology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Showstack J, Rothman AA, Hassmiller SB. The Future of Primary Care. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Safran DG. Primary care performance: views from the patient. In: Showstack J, Rothman AA, Hassmiller SB, eds. The Future of Primary Care. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass; 2004:17–39.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Larson EB, Finn SD, Kirk LM, et al. The future of general internal medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:69–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Future of Family Medicine Project Leadership Committee. The future of family medicine: a collaborative project of the family medicine community. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(suppl 1):S3–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. American Academy of Pediatrics, Medical Home Initiatives for Children with Special Needs Project Advisory Committee. The medical home. Pediatrics. 2003;110:184–6.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Starfield B, Shi L. The medical home, access to care, and insurance: a review of the evidence. Pediatrics. 2004;113:1493–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Grumbach K, Bodenheimer T. Can health care teams improve primary care practice? JAMA. 2004;291:1246–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Berry LL, Seiders K, Wilder SS. Innovations in access to care: a patient-centered approach. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:568–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Murray M, Berwick DM. Advanced access: reducing waiting and delays in primary care. JAMA. 2003;289:1035–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Murray M, Bodenheimer T, Rittenhouse D, Grumbach K. Improving timely access to primary care: case studies of the advanced access model. JAMA. 2003;289:1042–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kasper JE, Mulley AG Jr, Wennberg JE. Developing shared decision-making programs to improve the quality of health care. Qual Rev Bull. 1992;18:183–90.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ross SE, Lin CT. The effects of promoting patient access to medical records: a review. JAMA. 2003;10:129–38.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Safran DG, Karp M, Coltin K, et al. Measuring patients’ experiences with individual physicians. J Gen Intern Med (abstract). 2004;19(suppl):177.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bethell C, Peck C, Schor E. Assessing health system provision of well-child care: the promoting healthy development survey. Pediatrics. 2001;107:1084–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gordon P, Chin M. Achieving a New Standard in Primary Care for Low-Income Populations: Case Studies of Redesign and Change Through a Learning Collaborative. New York: The Commonwealth Fund; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Davis K. The Danish health system through an American lens. Health Policy. 2002;59:119–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Smith PC, York N. Quality incentives: the case of U.K. general practitioners. Health Affairs (Milwood). 2004;23:112–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rosenthal MB, Fernandopulle R, Song HSR, Landon B. Paying for quality: providers’ incentives for quality improvement. Health Affairs (Milwood). 2004;23:127–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sandy LG, Schroeder SA. Primary care in a new era: disillusion and dissolution? Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:262–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Landon BE, Reschovsky J, Blumenthal D. Changes in career satisfaction among primary care and specialist physicians, 1997–2001. JAMA. 2003;289:442–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Moore G, Showstack J. Primary care medicine in crisis: toward reconstruction and renewal. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:244–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Newhouse JP. Rate adjusters for medicare under capitation. Health Care Financing Rev. 1986;(Spec No):45–55.

  36. Reinhardt UE. “Boutique Medicine” in the US. BMJ. 2002;324:1335.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). AHRQ Health Information Technology Programs. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/research/hitfact.htm. Accessed April 4, 2005.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen Davis PhD.

Additional information

This paper draws on the Malcolm Peterson Honor Lecture given by Karen Davis at the 27th Annual Meeting of the Society of General Internal Medicine, Chicago, May 14, 2004.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davis, K., Schoenbaum, S.C. & Audet, AM. A 2020 vision of patient-centered primary care. J GEN INTERN MED 20, 953–957 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0178.x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0178.x

Key Words

Navigation