To read this content please select one of the options below:

Attitudes toward women managers: The influence of social dominance orientation and power distance on men in college

Aneika L. Simmons (Department of Management and Marketing, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, Texas, USA)
Jo Ann Duffy (Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, Texas, USA)
Hamed S. Alfraih (College of Business Administration, Kuwait University, Dahyat Abdullah Al‐Salem, Kuwait)

Gender in Management

ISSN: 1754-2413

Article publication date: 28 September 2012

1986

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to determine how men's perceptions of power distance (PD) and levels of social dominance orientation (SDO) interact to influence perceptions of women as managers in egalitarian and non‐egalitarian countries.

Design/methodology/approach

A team of multinational researchers distributed questionnaires composed of previously validated scales measuring SDO, PD and Attitude toward Women as Managers to US and Kuwaiti men in college. The study hypotheses were tested using hierarchical regression.

Findings

It was discovered that high levels of SDO in college men was negatively related to a favorable attitude toward women as managers in both the US and Kuwait. It was also found that perceptions of PD moderated the relationship between SDO and attitudes toward women as managers in Kuwait, but not in the USA. In addition, the interaction between PD and SDO was weaker in cultures that are more egalitarian as compared to those considered to be non‐egalitarian. The findings also suggested within‐group variance in terms of PD (i.e. Kuwait).

Originality/value

To the authors' knowledge, they are the first to empirically support the idea that PD interacts with SDO in influencing attitudes toward women managers in a comparison of countries with different levels of gender egalitarianism.

Keywords

Citation

Simmons, A.L., Duffy, J.A. and Alfraih, H.S. (2012), "Attitudes toward women managers: The influence of social dominance orientation and power distance on men in college", Gender in Management, Vol. 27 No. 7, pp. 482-498. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542411211273469

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2012, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles