To read this content please select one of the options below:

Disclosure of market risk or accounting measures of risk: an empirical study

Khaled Elmoatasem Abdelghany (Qatar University, College of Business and Economics, Doha, Qatar)

Managerial Auditing Journal

ISSN: 0268-6902

Article publication date: 1 October 2005

4462

Abstract

PurposeIn 1997, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Financial Reporting Release No. 48. FFR No. 48 requires that companies disclose both qualitative and quantitative market risk information for risks of loss arising from adverse changes in interest rates, foreign currency rates, commodity prices, and equity prices. This research focuses on the required disclosure of market risk related to equity prices which is commonly known as Beta in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM).Design/methodology/approachA sample of 323 companies listed in NYSE was selected to investigate the relationship between the market risk and the accounting measures of risk in order to determine the accounting variables that should be disclosed as a substitute of market risk, if there is no data, for the companies to fulfill the SEC requirements.FindingsBy identifying the accounting measures most closely associated with market Beta, the financial manager may be able to influence the Beta value by changing the company's structure as summarized in the successful accounting – determined risk measures. Such finding may also be used to estimate a company's Beta value in situations where historical stock market price data is limited or not available. An example of this later circumstance occurs in the case of initial public offer (IPO). Market price data may also be limited in acquisition cases, where the acquisition target is a subsidiary of a larger company.Originality/valueThe results of this study address these finance and accounting practice situations.

Keywords

Citation

Elmoatasem Abdelghany, K. (2005), "Disclosure of market risk or accounting measures of risk: an empirical study", Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 20 No. 8, pp. 867-875. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900510619692

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2005, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles