Abstract
A Comment on the Letter by N. Rougemaille et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 186406 (2005). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.
- Received 14 February 2006
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.109701
©2006 American Physical Society
A Comment on the Letter by N. Rougemaille et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 186406 (2005). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.109701
©2006 American Physical Society