Abstract
A Comment on the Letter by T. Cichorek et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 107002 (2005). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.
- Received 13 May 2009
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.019701
©2010 American Physical Society
A Comment on the Letter by T. Cichorek et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 107002 (2005). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.019701
©2010 American Physical Society