Vacuum polarization and dynamical chiral symmetry breaking: Phase diagram of QED with four-fermion contact interaction

F. Akram, A. Bashir, L. X. Gutiérrez-Guerrero, B. Masud, J. Rodríguez-Quintero, C. Calcaneo-Roldan, and M. E. Tejeda-Yeomans
Phys. Rev. D 87, 013011 – Published 25 January 2013

Abstract

We study chiral symmetry breaking for fundamental charged fermions coupled electromagnetically to photons with the inclusion of a four-fermion contact self-interaction term, characterized by coupling strengths α and λ, respectively. We employ multiplicatively renormalizable models for the photon dressing function and the electron-photon vertex that minimally ensures mass anomalous dimension γm=1. Vacuum polarization screens the interaction strength. Consequently, the pattern of dynamical mass generation for fermions is characterized by a critical number of massless fermion flavors Nf=Nfc above which chiral symmetry is restored. This effect is in diametrical opposition to the existence of criticality for the minimum interaction strengths, αc and λc, necessary to break chiral symmetry dynamically. The presence of virtual fermions dictates the nature of phase transition. Miransky scaling laws for the electromagnetic interaction strength α and the four-fermion coupling λ, observed for quenched QED, are replaced by a mean field power law behavior corresponding to a second-order phase transition. These results are derived analytically by employing the bifurcation analysis and are later confirmed numerically by solving the original nonlinearized gap equation. A three-dimensional critical surface is drawn in the phase space of (α,λ,Nf) to clearly depict the interplay of their relative strengths to separate the two phases. We also compute the β functions (βα and βλ) and observe that αc and λc are their respective ultraviolet fixed points. The power law part of the momentum dependence, describing the mass function, implies γm=1+s, which reproduces the quenched limit trivially. We also comment on the continuum limit and the triviality of QED.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
3 More
  • Received 7 September 2012

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.87.013011

© 2013 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

F. Akram1, A. Bashir2,3,4, L. X. Gutiérrez-Guerrero2, B. Masud1, J. Rodríguez-Quintero5, C. Calcaneo-Roldan6, and M. E. Tejeda-Yeomans6

  • 1Centre for High Energy Physics, University of the Punjab, Lahore 54590, Pakistan
  • 2Instituto de Física y Matemáticas, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Edificio C-3, Ciudad Universitaria, Morelia, Michoacán 58040, Mexico
  • 3Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
  • 4Center for Nuclear Research, Department of Physics, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 44242, USA
  • 5Departamento de Física Aplicada, Facultad de Ciencias Experimentales, Universidad de Huelva, Huelva 21071, Spain
  • 6Departamento de Física, Universidad de Sonora, Boulevard Luis Encinas J. y Rosales, Colonia Centro, Hermosillo, Sonora 83000, Mexico

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 87, Iss. 1 — 1 January 2013

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×