Density perturbations in f(R) gravity theories in metric and Palatini formalisms

Shinji Tsujikawa, Kotub Uddin, and Reza Tavakol
Phys. Rev. D 77, 043007 – Published 26 February 2008

Abstract

We make a detailed study of matter density perturbations in both metric and Palatini formalisms. Considering general theories whose Lagrangian density is a general function, f(R), of the Ricci scalar R, we derive the equation of matter density perturbations in each case, in a number of gauges, including comoving, longitudinal and uniform density gauges. We show that for viable f(R) models that satisfy cosmological and local gravity constraints (LGC), matter perturbation equations derived under a subhorizon approximation are valid even for super-Hubble scales provided the oscillating mode (scalaron) does not dominate over the matter-induced mode. Such approximate equations are especially reliable in the Palatini formalism because of the absence of scalarons. Using these equations we make a comparative study of the behavior of matter density perturbations as well as gravitational potentials for a number of classes of f(R) theories. In the metric formalism the quantity m=Rf,RR/f,R that characterizes the deviation from the ΛCDM model is constrained to be very small during a matter era in order to ensure compatibility with LGC, but the models in which m grows to the order of 101 around the present epoch can be allowed. These models also suffer from an additional fine-tuning due to the presence of scalaron oscillating modes which are absent in the Palatini case. In Palatini formalism LGC and background cosmological constraints provide only weak bounds on |m| by constraining it to be smaller than 0.1. This is in contrast to matter density perturbations which, on galactic scales, place far more stringent constraints on the present deviation parameter m of the order of |m|105104. This is due to the peculiar evolution of matter perturbations in the Palatini case, which exhibits a rapid growth or a damped oscillation depending on the sign of m.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
1 More
  • Received 7 December 2007

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.77.043007

©2008 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Shinji Tsujikawa*

  • Department of Physics, Gunma National College of Technology, Gunma 371-8530, Japan

Kotub Uddin and Reza Tavakol

  • School of Mathematical Sciences, Queen Mary, University of London, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom

  • *shinji@nat.gunma-ct.ac.jp
  • k.uddin@qmul.ac.uk
  • r.tavakol@qmul.ac.uk

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 77, Iss. 4 — 15 February 2008

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×