Canonical constraints on leptonic CP violation using ultrahigh energy cosmic ray neutrino fluxes

K. R. S. Balaji, Gilles Couture, and Cherif Hamzaoui
Phys. Rev. D 74, 033013 – Published 28 August 2006

Abstract

It is shown that one can in principle constrain the CP-violating parameter δ from measurements of four independent |Vij|2’s, or three |Vij|2’s and a ratio of two of them, in the leptonic sector. To quantify our approach, using unitarity, we derive simple expressions in terms of four independent |Vij|2’s for cosδ, and an expression for sin2δ from J2. Thus, depending on the values for |Vij| and their accuracy, we can set meaningful limits on |δ|. To illustrate numerically, if |Vμ1|2 is close to 0.1 with a 10% precision, and if |Ve3|2 is larger than 0.005 and for values of |Ve2|2 and |Vμ3|2 that stay within ±0.1 of the current experimental data leads to a bound: π/2|δ|π. Alternatively, a certain combination of parameters with values of |Ve3|2 larger than 0.01 leads to a closed bound of 73|δ|103. In general, we find that it is better to use |Vμ1|2 or |Vτ1|2 as the fourth independent |Vij|2 and that, over most of the parameter space, δ is least sensitive to |Ve3|2. With just three independent measurements (solar, atmospheric, and reactor), it is impossible to set limits on the CP phase. In this respect, we study the use of ultrahigh energy cosmic ray neutrino fluxes as the additional fourth information. We find that within the SM, neutrino fluxes of all three flavors will be very similar but that pushing current neutrino data to their extreme values still allowed, ratios of cosmic neutrino fluxes can differ by up to 20%; such large discrepancies could imply negligibly small CP violation. We also study a nonradiative neutrino decay model and find that the neutrino fluxes can differ by a factor of up to 3 within this model and that an accuracy of 10% on the neutrino fluxes is sufficient to set interesting limits on δ.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 5 May 2006

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.74.033013

©2006 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

K. R. S. Balaji1,2,3,*, Gilles Couture2,†, and Cherif Hamzaoui2,‡

  • 1Department of Physics, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada H3A 2T8
  • 2Département des Sciences de la Terre et de l’Atmosphère, Université du Québec à Montréal, CP 8888, succ. centre-ville, Montréal, Quebec, Canada H3C 3P8
  • 3Physique des Particules, Université de Montréal, CP 6128, succ. centre-ville, Montréal, Quebec, Canada H3C 3J7

  • *Electronic address: balaji@hep.physics.mcgill.ca
  • Electronic address: couture.gilles@uqam.ca
  • Electronic address: hamzaoui.cherif@uqam.ca

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 74, Iss. 3 — 1 August 2006

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×