Measurement of the n-p elastic scattering angular distribution at En=14.9 MeV

N. Boukharouba, F. B. Bateman, A. D. Carlson, C. E. Brient, S. M. Grimes, T. N. Massey, R. C. Haight, and D. E. Carter
Phys. Rev. C 82, 014001 – Published 8 July 2010

Abstract

The relative differential cross section for the elastic scattering of neutrons by protons was measured at an incident neutron energy En=14.9 MeV and for center-of-mass scattering angles ranging from about 60° to 180°. Angular distribution values were obtained from the normalization of the integrated data to the n-p total elastic scattering cross section. Comparisons of the normalized data to the predictions of the Arndt et al. phase-shift analysis, those of the Nijmegen group, and with the ENDF/B-VII.0 evaluation are sensitive to the value of the total elastic scattering cross section used to normalize the data. The results of a fit to a first-order Legendre polynomial expansion are in good agreement in the backward scattering hemisphere with the predictions of the Arndt et al. phase-shift analysis, those of the Nijmegen group, and to a lesser extent, with the ENDF/B-VII.0 evaluation. A fit to a second-order expansion is in better agreement with the ENDF/B-VII.0 evaluation than with the other predictions, in particular when the total elastic scattering cross section given by Arndt et al. and the Nijmegen group is used to normalize the data. A Legendre polynomial fit to the existing n-p scattering data in the 14 MeV energy region, excluding the present measurement, showed that a best fit is obtained for a second-order expansion. Furthermore, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test confirms the general agreement in the backward scattering hemisphere and shows that significant differences between the database and the predictions occur in the angular range between 60° and 120° and below 20°. Although there is good overall agreement in the backward scattering hemisphere, more precision small-angle scattering data and a better definition of the total elastic cross section are needed for an accurate determination of the shape and magnitude of the angular distribution.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
5 More
  • Received 24 February 2010

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.82.014001

©2010 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

N. Boukharouba1, F. B. Bateman2, A. D. Carlson2, C. E. Brient3, S. M. Grimes3, T. N. Massey3, R. C. Haight4, and D. E. Carter5

  • 1Department of Physics, University of Guelma, Guelma 24000, Algeria
  • 2National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA
  • 3Department of Physics and Astronomy, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio 45701, USA
  • 4Los Alamos Neutron Science Center, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
  • 5Institute of Nuclear and Particle Physics, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio 45701, USA

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 82, Iss. 1 — July 2010

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×