Investigation of isotopic dependence on the O + Ni fusion cross section near barrier energies

Nabendu Kumar Deb, K. Kalita, Harun Al Rashid, Amar Das, S. Nath, J. Gehlot, N. Madhavan, Rohan Biswas, Rudra N. Sahoo, Pankaj K. Giri, A. Parihari, Niraj K. Rai, Saumyajit Biswas, Amritraj Mahato, and B. J. Roy
Phys. Rev. C 105, 054608 – Published 19 May 2022

Abstract

Fusion excitation functions have been measured for O16+Ni61 and O18+Ni61,62 systems around the Coulomb barrier (0.7VB1.3VB) using the recoil mass spectrometer, heavy ion reaction analyzer. The ground state Q value for two neutron stripping is positive for both systems with O18 as the projectile. Strong enhancement of the experimental fusion cross sections were observed below the barrier for all the systems compared to that of the predictions of the one-dimensional barrier penetration model. To understand such enhancement, a coupled-channels formalism has been used. A comparative study of these systems indicated that the coupling of two neutron transfer channels with the collective excitations could play the role behind the sub-barrier fusion enhancement for O18 induced reactions. However, the sub-barrier enhancement for O16 + Ni61 is found to be due to the coupling of quadrupole vibrations of both the interacting nuclei. Also after comparing these systems with other systems of different Ni isotopes, we have found that the signature of the role of coupling to neutron transfer channels due to ground state positive Q value for neutron transfer is ambiguous.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
1 More
  • Received 8 December 2021
  • Accepted 28 April 2022

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.105.054608

©2022 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nuclear Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Nabendu Kumar Deb1, K. Kalita1,*, Harun Al Rashid1,2, Amar Das1,3, S. Nath4, J. Gehlot4, N. Madhavan4, Rohan Biswas4, Rudra N. Sahoo5, Pankaj K. Giri6,7, A. Parihari8, Niraj K. Rai9, Saumyajit Biswas10, Amritraj Mahato6, and B. J. Roy11,12

  • 1Department of Physics, Gauhati University, Guwahati 781014, Assam, India
  • 2Department of Physics, BBK College, Nagaon, Barpeta 781311, Assam, India
  • 3Department of Physics, Suren Das College, Hajo 781102, Assam, India
  • 4Nuclear Physics Group, Inter-University Accelerator Centre, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi 110067, India
  • 5Racah Institute of Physics, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91904, Israel
  • 6Department of Physics, Central University of Jharkhand, Ranchi 835205, Jharkhand, India
  • 7Department of Physics, Chandigarh University, Mohali 140413, Punjab, India
  • 8Department of Physics and Astrophysics, University of Delhi, Delhi 110007, India
  • 9Department of Physics, Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, Punjab, India
  • 10Department of Physics, Murshidabad College of Engineering and Technology, Berhampore 742102, West Bengal, India
  • 11Nuclear Physics Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 400085, Maharashtra, India
  • 12Homi Bhabha National Institute, Anushaktinagar, Mumbai 400094, Maharashtra, India

  • *ku_kalita@yahoo.com

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 105, Iss. 5 — May 2022

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×