Influence of fast emissions and statistical de-excitation on the isospin transport ratio

A. Camaiani, S. Piantelli, A. Ono, G. Casini, B. Borderie, R. Bougault, C. Ciampi, J. A. Dueñas, C. Frosin, J. D. Frankland, D. Gruyer, N. LeNeindre, I. Lombardo, G. Mantovani, P. Ottanelli, M. Parlog, G. Pasquali, S. Upadhyaya, S. Valdré, G. Verde, and E. Vient
Phys. Rev. C 102, 044607 – Published 9 October 2020

Abstract

Isospin transport ratio is a powerful method to estimate the neutron-proton (n-p) equilibration in heavy-ion collisions, and extensively used to obtain information on the asy-stiffness of the nuclear equation of state. In fact such a ratio is expected to bypass any perturbations introducing a linear transformation of the chosen observable. In particular, it is supposed to overcome contributions due to emission, either of dynamical or statistical nature, from the primary fragments formed during the collisions. In this paper we explore the validity of this assumption, looking at the quasiprojectile n-p ratio (N/Z) in peripheral and semiperipheral events for Ca+Ca reactions at 35MeV/nucleon, simulated via the antisymmetrized molecular dynamics transport model, coupled to different statistical decay codes. The statistical de-excitation of the primary fragments introduces a linear transformation at relatively high excitation energies (above 2MeV/nucleon) when the residue approaches the evaporation attractor line, while some effect is produced at lower excitation energies due to the occurrence of some nonlinearities. As for fast emissions after the end of the projectile-target interaction it is shown that they introduce a nonlinear transformation too.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
1 More
  • Received 9 April 2020
  • Accepted 22 September 2020

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.102.044607

©2020 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nuclear Physics

Authors & Affiliations

A. Camaiani1,2,*, S. Piantelli2, A. Ono3, G. Casini2, B. Borderie4, R. Bougault5, C. Ciampi1,2, J. A. Dueñas6, C. Frosin1,2, J. D. Frankland7, D. Gruyer5, N. LeNeindre5, I. Lombardo8, G. Mantovani9,10,11, P. Ottanelli1,2, M. Parlog5,12, G. Pasquali1,2, S. Upadhyaya13, S. Valdré2, G. Verde8, and E. Vient5

  • 1Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Firenze, Italy
  • 2INFN, Sezione di Firenze, Italy
  • 3Department of Physics, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan
  • 4Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, 91405 Orsay, France
  • 5Normandie Université, ENSICAEN, UNICAEN, CNRS/IN2P3, LPC Caen, 14000 Caen, France
  • 6Depto. de Ingeniería Eléctrica y Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Física, Matemáticas y Computación, Universidad de Huelva, 21007 Huelva, Spain
  • 7GANIL, CEA/DRF-CNRS/IN2P3, 14076 Caen, France
  • 8INFN Sezione di Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
  • 9INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, 35020 Legnaro, Italy
  • 10Dipartimento di Fisica, Universitá di Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy
  • 11Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15705 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
  • 12“Horia Hulubei” National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering (IFIN-HH), RO-077125 Bucharest Magurele, Romania
  • 13Faculty of Physics, Astronomy and Applied Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, 30-348 Kracow, Poland

  • *alberto.camaiani@fi.infn.it

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 102, Iss. 4 — October 2020

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×