Nuclear matrix elements for the λ mechanism of 0νββ decay of Ca48 in the nuclear shell-model: Closure versus nonclosure approach

Shahariar Sarkar, Y. Iwata, and P. K. Raina
Phys. Rev. C 102, 034317 – Published 14 September 2020

Abstract

The λ and mββ mechanisms of neutrinoless double beta decay (0νββ) occur with light neutrino exchange via WLWR and WLWL mediation, respectively. In the present study, we calculate the nuclear matrix elements (NMEs) for the mββ and λ mechanisms of 0νββ, which has origin in the left-right symmetric model with right-handed gauge boson at TeV scale. The NMEs are calculated for one of the 0νββ decaying isotope Ca48 in the interacting nuclear shell-model using the GXPF1A effective interaction of pf shell. The NMEs are calculated in both closure and nonclosure approaches using four different methods: closure, running closure, running nonclosure, and mixed methods. All the NMEs are calculated incorporating the effects of the finite size of nucleons and the revisited higher-order terms such as pseudoscalar and weak magnetism terms of the nucleon currents. Inclusion of the short-range nature of nucleon-nucleon interaction in Miller-Spencer, CD-Bonn, and AV18 parametrizations is also taken care of. We have used closure energy E=0.5 MeV, which is near to the optimal value of closure energy that is extracted by examining the dependence of NMEs with closure energy in closure and mixed methods. The comparative dependence of the running closure and running nonclosure NMEs with the spin-parity of the allowed states of intermediate nucleus Sc48, the coupled spin-parity of the two initial decaying neutrons and the final two protons, the cutoff excitation energy of Sc48, and the cutoff number of states of Sc48 are examined. The neutrino momentum and radial distribution of different types of NMEs are explored. It is found that there is a significant enhancement in MqGT-type NMEs, which originates from the large momentum distribution for the inclusion of the higher-order pseudoscalar term of the nucleon currents.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
4 More
  • Received 10 March 2020
  • Revised 5 August 2020
  • Accepted 25 August 2020

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.102.034317

©2020 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nuclear Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Shahariar Sarkar1,*, Y. Iwata2, and P. K. Raina1

  • 1Indian Institute of Technology Ropar, Rupnagar, Punjab-140001, India
  • 2Faculty of Chemistry, Materials and Bioengineering, Kansai University, Yamate-cho 3-3-35, Osaka 564-8680, Japan

  • *shahariar.sarkar@iitrpr.ac.in

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 102, Iss. 3 — September 2020

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×