Electronic structure and stability of hyperstoichiometric UO2+x under pressure

Jianwei Wang, Rodney C. Ewing, and Udo Becker
Phys. Rev. B 88, 024109 – Published 15 July 2013

Abstract

Electronic-Structure and high-pressure phase transitions of stoichiometric uranium dioxide (UO2) and hyperstoichiometric UO2.03 were investigated using first-principles calculations. Density functional theory calculations using the generalized gradient approximation and the projector-augmented wave method with the on-site Coulomb repulsive interactions were applied in order to reasonably calculate the equilibrium volume, total and partial density of states, band gap of UO2+x, and energetics of the high-pressure phase transitions. Structure optimizations were completed with and without the Hubbard U-ramping method separately. The U-ramping method was intended to remove the metastable states of the 5f electrons of both stoichiometric and hyperstoichiometric UO2+x. Using the Hubbard U parameters (U = 3.8, J = 0.4), whose values are based on the experimental band gap width of 2.1 eV as a reference, the calculated cell parameter for the stoichiometric UO2 with cubic fluorite structure is about 1% greater than the experimental unit cell parameter; in contrast, it is about 1% smaller than the experimental value without the on-site Coulomb repulsive interactions. For hyperstoichiometric UO2.03 with the cubic fluorite structure, the interstitial oxygen at the octahedral interstitial site induces new bands at the top of the band gap of the stoichiometric UO2, similar to those of the high-pressure phase with orthorhombic cotunnite structure. The orbitals associated with the charge transfers to the interstitial oxygen in hyperstoichiometric UO2.03 are partially delocalized and partially localized in both the cubic fluorite structure and orthorhombic cotunnite structure. The energy required for the incorporation of an interstitial O atom is 0.3 eV higher for the orthorhombic phase than for the cubic phase at ambient pressure and increases to 0.5 eV at 10 GPa. The calculated transition pressures from the cubic to the orthorhombic structure are 18 and 27 GPa for UO2 and UO2.03, respectively. The dramatic increase in the calculated transition pressure for the hyperstoichiometric UO2 is related to structural incompatibility of the interstitial oxygen in the cotunnite structure (high-pressure phase), which is less in the case of the fluorite structure. These results suggest that experimentally determined pressure values for the phase transition can be significantly affected by small compositional deviations off the ideal stoichiometric UO2. Comparisons of the results using the U-ramping method and without using the U-ramping method suggest that the electronic metastability of UO2 affects the calculated total energy and electronic structure and could lead to a different local defect configuration for the hyperstoichiometric orthorhombic phase. However, the metastability has a negligible effect on the calculated phase transition pressure.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
9 More
  • Received 23 November 2011

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.88.024109

©2013 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Jianwei Wang*, Rodney C. Ewing, and Udo Becker

  • University of Michigan, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1005, USA

  • *Mailing address: Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences 1100 North University Avenue, 2534 C.C. Little Building, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1005, USA; jwwang@umich.edu; current address: Department of Geology & Geophysics, Louisiana State University, E235 Howe-Russell, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA; jianwei@lsu.edu

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 88, Iss. 2 — 1 July 2013

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×