• Editors' Suggestion

Anisotropy of the irreversibility field for Zr-doped (Y,Gd)Ba2Cu3O7x thin films up to 45 T

C. Tarantini, J. Jaroszynski, F. Kametani, Y. L. Zuev, A. Gurevich, Y. Chen, V. Selvamanickam, D. C. Larbalestier, and D. K. Christen
Phys. Rev. B 84, 224514 – Published 21 December 2011

Abstract

The anisotropic irreversibility field BIrr of two YBa2Cu3O7x thin films doped with additional rare earth (RE) = (Gd, Y) and Zr and containing strong correlated pins (splayed BaZrO3 nanorods and RE2O3 nanoprecipitates) has been measured over a very broad range up to 45 T at temperatures 56 K < T < Tc. We found that the experimental angular dependence of BIrr (θ) does not follow the mass anisotropy scaling BIrr(θ)=BIrr(0)(cos2θ+γ2sin2θ)1/2, where γ=(mc/mab)1/2=56 for the RE-doped YBa2Cu3O7x (REBCO) crystals, mab and mc are the effective masses along the ab plane and the c-axis, respectively, and θ is the angle between B and the c-axis. For B parallel to the ab planes and to the c-axis correlated pinning strongly enhances BIrr, while at intermediate angles, BIrr(θ) follows the scaling behavior BIrr(θ)(cos2θ+γRP2sin2θ)1/2 with the effective anisotropy factor γRP3 significantly smaller than the mass anisotropy would suggest. In spite of the strong effects of c-axis BaZrO3 nanorods, we found even greater enhancements of BIrr for fields along the ab planes than for fields parallel to the c-axis, as well as different temperature dependences of the correlated pinning contributions to BIrr for B//ab and B//c. Our results show that the dense and strong pins, which can now be incorporated into REBCO thin films in a controlled way, exert major and diverse effects on the measured vortex pinning anisotropy and the irreversibility field over wide ranges of B and T. In particular, we show that the relative contribution of correlated pinning to BIrr for B//c increases as the temperature increases due to the suppression of thermal fluctuations of vortices by splayed distribution of BaZrO3 nanorods.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
1 More
  • Received 15 November 2011

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.224514

©2011 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

C. Tarantini1,*, J. Jaroszynski1, F. Kametani1, Y. L. Zuev2,3, A. Gurevich1,4, Y. Chen5, V. Selvamanickam6, D. C. Larbalestier1, and D. K. Christen2

  • 1National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32310, USA
  • 2Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
  • 3University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
  • 4Department of Physics, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia 23529, USA
  • 5SuperPower Inc., Schenectady, New York 12304, USA
  • 6Department of Mechanical Engineering and the Texas Center for Superconductivity, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204, USA

  • *tarantini@asc.magnet.fsu.edu

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 84, Iss. 22 — 1 December 2011

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×