First-principles and time-differential γγ perturbed-angular-correlation spectroscopy study of structural and electronic properties of Ta-doped TiO2 semiconductor

G. N. Darriba, L. A. Errico, P. D. Eversheim, G. Fabricius, and M. Rentería
Phys. Rev. B 79, 115213 – Published 27 March 2009; Erratum Phys. Rev. B 84, 239903 (2011)

Abstract

The, time-differential γγ perturbed-angular-correlation (TDPAC) technique using ion-implanted H181f(T181a) tracers was applied to study the hyperfine interactions of T181a impurities in the rutile structure of TiO2 single crystals. The experiments were performed in air in the temperature range of 300–1273 K, allowing the electric-field-gradient (EFG) tensor characterization (in magnitude, asymmetry, and orientation) at T181a probe atoms located in defect-free cation sites of the structure. The measured EFG is parallel to the [001] crystal axis, as occurs at Ti sites, but normal to the EFG orientation observed at C111d impurities in TiO2 single crystals [L. A. Errico et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 055503 (2002)]. In addition, ab initio calculations were performed using the full-potential augmented plane wave plus local orbital method that allow us to treat the electronic structure of the doped system and the atomic relaxations induced by the Ta impurity in a fully self-consistent way. We considered different dilutions of the doped system (using the supercell approach) and studied the electronic properties and structural atomic relaxation dependence on the charge state of the impurity. The accuracy of the calculations and the excellent agreement of the predicted magnitude, asymmetry, and orientation of the EFG tensor with the experimental results enable us to infer the EFG sign, not accessible with conventional TDPAC experiments. The comparison of the measured EFG at Ta sites with experimental and ab initio theoretical results reported in the literature at Cd, Ta, and Ti sites in TiO2 allowed us to obtain a deeper insight on the role played by metal impurities in oxide semiconductors.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
1 More
  • Received 30 December 2008

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.115213

©2009 American Physical Society

Erratum

Authors & Affiliations

G. N. Darriba1, L. A. Errico1,2, P. D. Eversheim3, G. Fabricius4, and M. Rentería1,*

  • 1Departamento de Física and IFLP (CONICET-UNLP), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, CC 67, 1900 La Plata, Argentina
  • 2Universidad Nacional del Noroeste Bonaerense (UNNOBA), Monteagudo 2772, 2700 Pergamino, Argentina
  • 3Helmholtz-Institut für Strahlen- und Kernphysik (ISKP), Universität Bonn, Nussallee 14-16, 53115 Bonn, Germany
  • 4Instituto de Investigaciones Fisicoquímicas Teóricas y Aplicadas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, CC 16, 1900 La Plata, Argentina

  • *Corresponding author; renteria@fisica.unlp.edu.ar

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 79, Iss. 11 — 15 March 2009

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×