Abstract
BACKGROUND In sub-Saharan Africa, increased antiretroviral therapy (ART) availability has improved survival after diagnosis of Kaposi sarcoma (KS) compared to the pre-ART era, but mortality among patients with KS is still considerably higher than HIV-infected persons without KS. Furthermore, among those patients with KS who are treated initially with ART without adjunct chemotherapy and who do survive, little is known about how well they function and feel — quality of life (QOL) — compared to those without KS.
METHODS Among HIV-infected adults initiating ART in two prospective studies in Uganda, we compared those presenting with KS to those without KS. QOL was measured using the Medical Outcomes Survey-HIV instrument prior to ART initiation and at 16, 32, and 48 weeks thereafter; higher scores indicate better QOL. To ascertain the independent effect of KS versus non-KS on 11 domains of QOL and two summary scores, we created mixed effects models adjusted for directed acyclic graph-informed confounders.
RESULTS We examined 224 participants with KS and 730 without KS, among whom 64% were women and median age was 34 years. Prior to ART initiation, participants had a median CD4+ T count of 159 cells/mm3 and plasma HIV RNA of 5.1 log10 copies/ml. In adjusted analyses prior to ART initiation, those with KS had lower mean scores in 8 of 11 QOL domains and both physical and mental health summary scores compared to those without KS. After 48 weeks of ART, those with KS had higher mean QOL scores compared those without KS in 4 domains and the mental health summary score, and lower scores in only one domain. There was no significant difference in 6 domains and the physical health summary score,
CONCLUSIONS Amongst HIV-infected adults in East Africa, at time of ART initiation, those with KS had worse mean QOL compared to those without KS. Over the first year of ART, those with KS became comparable to or exceeded those without KS in most QOL domains. The findings indicate that some patients with KS can be treated with ART alone and further emphasize the need to predict those who will do well with ART alone versus those who need additional initial therapy.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Supported by National Institutes of Health (U54 CA190153 and U54 CA254571)
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
IRB of UCSF gave ethical approval of this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding: Supported by National Institutes of Health (U54 CA190153 and U54 CA254571)
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.