A functional survey of the enhancer activity of conserved non-coding sequences from vertebrate Iroquois cluster gene deserts

  1. Elisa de la Calle-Mustienes1,
  2. Cármen Gloria Feijóo2,3,
  3. Miguel Manzanares4,
  4. Juan J. Tena1,
  5. Elisa Rodríguez-Seguel1,
  6. Annalisa Letizia5,
  7. Miguel L. Allende2, and
  8. José Luis Gómez-Skarmeta1,6
  1. 1 Centro Andaluz de Biología del Desarrollo, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas and Universidad Pablo de Olavide, 41013 Sevilla, Spain
  2. 2 Millennium Nucleus in Developmental Biology and Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Casilla 653 Santiago, Chile
  3. 3 Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Andrés Bello, Republica 275 Santiago, Chile
  4. 4 Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas–Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, 28029 Spain
  5. 5 Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas–Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, 28029 Spain

Abstract

Recent studies of the genome architecture of vertebrates have uncovered two unforeseen aspects of its organization. First, large regions of the genome, called gene deserts, are devoid of protein-coding sequences and have no obvious biological role. Second, comparative genomics has highlighted the existence of an array of highly conserved non-coding regions (HCNRs) in all vertebrates. Most surprisingly, these structural features are strongly associated with genes that have essential functions during development. Among these, the vertebrate Iroquois (Irx) genes stand out on both fronts. Mammalian Irx genes are organized in two clusters (IrxA and IrxB) that span >1 Mb each with no other genes interspersed. Additionally, a large number of HCNRs exist within Irx clusters. We have systematically examined the enhancer activity of HCNRs from the IrxB cluster using transgenic Xenopus and zebrafish embryos. Most of these HCNRs are active in subdomains of endogenous Irx expression, and some are candidates to contain shared enhancers of neighboring genes, which could explain the evolutionary conservation of Irx clusters. Furthermore, HCNRs present in tetrapod IrxB but not in fish may be responsible for novel Irx expression domains that appeared after their divergence. Finally, we have performed a more detailed analysis on two IrxB ultraconserved non-coding regions (UCRs) duplicated in IrxA clusters in similar relative positions. These four regions share a core region highly conserved among all of them and drive expression in similar domains. However, inter-species conserved sequences surrounding the core, specific for each of these UCRs, are able to modulate their expression.

Footnotes

  • [Supplemental material is available online at www.genome.org. The following individuals kindly provided reagents, samples, or unpublished information as indicated in the paper: E. Amaya, A. Leticia, P.A. Krieg, E. Bellefroid, J.L. Mullor, and Z. Gong.]

  • Article and publication are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.4004805. Article published online before print in July 2005.

  • 6 Corresponding author. E-mail jlgomska{at}upo.es; fax 34-954349376.

    • Accepted June 7, 2005.
    • Received April 6, 2005.
| Table of Contents

Preprint Server