1887

Abstract

Although most non-segmented negative-strand RNA viruses (NNSVs) replicate in the cytoplasm, NNSV proteins often exert host manipulatory functions in the nucleus. Matrix (M) proteins of henipaviruses and other paramyxoviruses shuttle through the nucleus, where host factors may bind for M modification or host-cell manipulation. Acidic leucine-rich nuclear phosphoprotein 32 family member B (ANP32B) is an interactor of Hendra and Nipah virus M. Both accumulate in the nucleus in an ANP32B-dependent manner. Here we demonstrate that the nuclear localization signal (NLS) of ANP32B is dispensable for HeV M binding. Specific purification of M-ANP32B but not of M-ANP32A complexes revealed that neither the negatively charged acidic nor the leucine-rich regions of ANP32 proteins per se mediate interactions with henipavirus M proteins. Whereas pneumovirus M did not interact with ANP32B, Newcastle disease virus (NDV, genus ), Sendai virus (SeV, genus ), Measles virus (MeV, genus ) and Canine distemper virus (CDV, genus ) M were able to form complexes with ANP32B. However, in contrast to NDV M and SeV M, which accumulated in the nucleus ANP32B dependently, both morbillivirus Ms did not accumulate in the nucleus, neither at ANP32B overexpression nor after nuclear protein export inhibition. These results indicate that intracellular compartmentalization of cytoplasmic morbillivirus M and nuclear ANP32B prevented an intracellular interaction. Overall, we provide evidence for a general ability of paramyxovirus M proteins to interact with ANP32B. This suggests a conserved, yet to be clarified mechanism might play a role in host manipulation and immune regulation in infected hosts.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/jgv.0.001362
2020-01-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jgv/101/1/44.html?itemId=/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/jgv.0.001362&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Rubin S, Vandermeulen C. The Biology of Paramyxoviruses Mumps Caister Academic Press; 2011
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Schneider-Schaulies S, Duprex WP. The Biology of Paramyxoviruses Measles Virus Caister Academic Press; 2011
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Aldous EW, Alexander DJ. Newcastle disease in pheasants (Phasianus colchicus): a review. Vet J 2008; 175:181–185 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cattoli G, Susta L, Terregino C, Brown C. Newcastle disease: a review of field recognition and current methods of laboratory detection. J Vet Diagn Invest 2011; 23:637–656 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Field HE, Mackenzie JS, Daszak P. Henipaviruses: emerging paramyxoviruses associated with fruit bats. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2007; 315:133–159 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. McCormack JG, Hendra MJG. Hendra and Nipah viruses: new zoonotically-acquired human pathogens. Respir Care Clin N Am 2005; 11:59–66 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Escaffre O, Borisevich V, Rockx B. Pathogenesis of Hendra and Nipah virus infection in humans. J Infect Dev Ctries 2013; 7:308–311 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Lo MK, Rota PA. The emergence of Nipah virus, a highly pathogenic paramyxovirus. J Clin Virol 2008; 43:396–400 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bonaparte MI, Dimitrov AS, Bossart KN, Crameri G, Mungall BA et al. Ephrin-B2 ligand is a functional receptor for Hendra virus and Nipah virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:10652–10657 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Negrete OA, Levroney EL, Aguilar HC, Bertolotti-Ciarlet A, Nazarian R et al. Ephrinb2 is the entry receptor for Nipah virus, an emergent deadly paramyxovirus. Nature 2005; 436:401–405 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Pernet O, Wang YE, Lee B. Henipavirus receptor usage and tropism. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2012; 359:59–78 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Basler CF. Nipah and Hendra virus interactions with the innate immune system. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2012; 359:123–152 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Battisti AJ, Meng G, Winkler DC, McGinnes LW, Plevka P et al. Structure and assembly of a paramyxovirus matrix protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109:13996–14000 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Harrison MS, Sakaguchi T, Schmitt AP. Paramyxovirus assembly and budding: building particles that transmit infections. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2010; 42:1416–1429 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Takimoto T, Portner A. Molecular mechanism of paramyxovirus budding. Virus Res 2004; 106:133–145 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ciancanelli MJ, Basler CF. Mutation of YMYL in the Nipah virus matrix protein abrogates budding and alters subcellular localization. J Virol 2006; 80:12070–12078 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Patch JR, Han Z, McCarthy SE, Yan L, Wang L-F et al. The YPLGVG sequence of the Nipah virus matrix protein is required for budding. Virol J 2008; 5:137 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Dietzel E, Kolesnikova L, Sawatsky B, Heiner A, Weis M et al. Nipah virus matrix protein influences fusogenicity and is essential for particle infectivity and stability. J Virol 2016; 90:2514–2522 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Liljeroos L, Butcher SJ. Matrix proteins as centralized organizers of negative-sense RNA virions. Front Biosci 2013; 18:696–715 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Wang YE, Park A, Lake M, Pentecost M, Torres B et al. Ubiquitin-regulated nuclear-cytoplasmic trafficking of the Nipah virus matrix protein is important for viral budding. PLoS Pathog 2010; 6:e1001186 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. McLinton EC, Wagstaff KM, Lee A, Moseley GW, Marsh GA et al. Nuclear localization and secretion competence are conserved among Henipavirus matrix proteins. J Gen Virol 2017; 98:563–576 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Pentecost M, Vashisht AA, Lester T, Voros T, Beaty SM et al. Evidence for ubiquitin-regulated nuclear and subnuclear trafficking among Paramyxovirinae matrix proteins. PLoS Pathog 2015; 11:e1004739 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Giuffre RM, Tovell DR, Kay CM, Tyrrell DL. Evidence for an interaction between the membrane protein of a paramyxovirus and actin. J Virol 1982; 42:963–968
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Duan Z, Chen J, Xu H, Zhu J, Li Q et al. The nucleolar phosphoprotein B23 targets Newcastle disease virus matrix protein to the nucleoli and facilitates viral replication. Virology 2014; 452-453:212–222 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Li X, Li X, Cao H, Wang Y, Zheng SJ. Engagement of new Castle disease virus (NDV) matrix (M) protein with charged multivesicular body protein (CHMP) 4 facilitates viral replication. Virus Res 2013; 171:80–88 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Bauer A, Neumann S, Karger A, Henning A-K, Maisner A et al. Anp32B is a nuclear target of Henipavirus M proteins. PLoS One 2014; 9:e97233 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Martinez-Gil L, Vera-Velasco NM, Mingarro I. Exploring the Human-Nipah virus protein-protein interactome. J Virol 2017; 91: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Deffrasnes C, Marsh GA, Foo CH, Rootes CL, Gould CM et al. Genome-Wide siRNA screening at biosafety level 4 reveals a crucial role for fibrillarin in Henipavirus infection. PLoS Pathog 2016; 12:e1005478 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Bharaj P, Wang YE, Dawes BE, Yun TE, Park A et al. The matrix protein of Nipah virus targets the E3-ubiquitin ligase TRIM6 to inhibit the IKKε kinase-mediated type-I IFN antiviral response. PLoS Pathog 2016; 12:e1005880 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Munemasa Y, Suzuki T, Aizawa K, Miyamoto S, Imai Y et al. Promoter region-specific histone incorporation by the novel histone chaperone ANP32B and DNA-binding factor KLF5. Mol Cell Biol 2008; 28:1171–1181 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Shen SM, Yu Y, Wu YL, Cheng JK, Wang LS et al. Downregulation of ANP32B, a novel substrate of caspase-3, enhances caspase-3 activation and apoptosis induction in myeloid leukemic cells. Carcinogenesis 2010; 31:419–426 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Brennan CM, Gallouzi IE, Steitz JA. Protein ligands to HuR modulate its interaction with target mRNAs in vivo . J Cell Biol 2000; 151:1–14 [View Article] [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Fries B, Heukeshoven J, Hauber I, Grüttner C, Stocking C et al. Analysis of nucleocytoplasmic trafficking of the HuR ligand April and its influence on CD83 expression. J Biol Chem 2007; 282:4504–4515 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Prechtel AT, Chemnitz J, Schirmer S, Ehlers C, Langbein-Detsch I et al. Expression of CD83 is regulated by HuR via a novel cis-active coding region RNA element. J Biol Chem 2006; 281:10912–10925 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Chemnitz J, Pieper D, Stich L, Schumacher U, Balabanov S et al. The acidic protein rich in leucines ANP32B is an immunomodulator of inflammation in mice. Sci Rep 2019; 9:4853 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Bodem J, Schied T, Gabriel R, Rammling M, Rethwilm A. Foamy virus nuclear RNA export is distinct from that of other retroviruses. J Virol 2011; 85:2333–2341 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Higashino F, Aoyagi M, Takahashi A, Ishino M, Taoka M et al. Adenovirus E4orf6 targets pp32/LANP to control the fate of ARE-containing mRNAs by perturbing the CRM1-dependent mechanism. J Cell Biol 2005; 170:15–20 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Hung G, Flint SJ. Normal human cell proteins that interact with the adenovirus type 5 E1B 55 kDa protein. Virology 2017; 504:12–24 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Sugiyama K, Kawaguchi A, Okuwaki M, Nagata K. Pp32 and April are host cell-derived regulators of influenza virus RNA synthesis from cRNA. elife 2015; 4:e08939 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Domingues P, Hale BG. Functional insights into ANP32A-Dependent influenza A virus polymerase host restriction. Cell Rep 2017; 20:2538–2546 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Staller E, Sheppard CM, Neasham PJ, Mistry B, Peacock TP et al. Anp32 proteins are essential for influenza virus replication in human cells. J Virol 2019; 93: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Long JS, Giotis ES, Moncorgé O, Frise R, Mistry B et al. Species difference in ANP32A underlies influenza A virus polymerase host restriction. Nature 2016; 529:101–104 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Niwa H, Yamamura K, Miyazaki J. Efficient selection for high-expression transfectants with a novel eukaryotic vector. Gene 1991; 108:193–199 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Braman J, Papworth C, Greener A. Site-Directed mutagenesis using double-stranded plasmid DNA templates. Methods Mol Biol 1996; 57:31–44 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Buchholz UJ, Finke S, Conzelmann KK. Generation of bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV) from cDNA: BRSV NS2 is not essential for virus replication in tissue culture, and the human RSV leader region acts as a functional BRSV genome promoter. J Virol 1999; 73:251–259
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Fu C, Donovan WP, Shikapwashya-Hasser O, Ye X, Cole RH. Hot fusion: an efficient method to clone multiple DNA fragments as well as inverted repeats without ligase. PLoS One 2014; 9:e115318 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. Nih image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 2012; 9:671–675 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Yu X, Shahriari S, Li HM, Ghildyal R. Measles virus matrix protein inhibits host cell transcription. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0161360 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Liu YC, Grusovin J, Adams TE. Electrostatic interactions between Hendra virus matrix proteins are required for efficient Virus-Like-Particle assembly. J Virol 2018; 92: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Long JS, Idoko-Akoh A, Mistry B, Goldhill D, Staller E et al. Species specific differences in use of ANP32 proteins by influenza A virus. eLife 2019; 8: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Zhang H, Zhang Z, Wang Y, Wang M, Wang X et al. Fundamental contribution and host range determination of ANP32A and ANP32B in influenza A virus polymerase activity. J Virol 2019; 93: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Jiang X et al. Distinctive roles of PHAP proteins and prothymosin-alpha in a death regulatory pathway. Science 2003; 299:223–226 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  53. CX L, Shen SM, Wang LS, Yu Y. Caspase-3-Resistant uncleavable form of acidic leucine-rich nuclear phosphoprotein 32B potentiates leukemic cell apoptosis. Mol Med Rep 2015; 11:2813–2818
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Kassis R, Larrous F, Estaquier J, Bourhy H. Lyssavirus matrix protein induces apoptosis by a TRAIL-dependent mechanism involving caspase-8 activation. J Virol 2004; 78:6543–6555 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Gholami A, Kassis R, Real E, Delmas O, Guadagnini S et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction in lyssavirus-induced apoptosis. J Virol 2008; 82:4774–4784 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Ghildyal R, Baulch-Brown C, Mills J, Meanger J. The matrix protein of human respiratory syncytial virus localises to the nucleus of infected cells and inhibits transcription. Arch Virol 2003; 148:1419–1429 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Peeples ME, Wang C, Gupta KC, Coleman N. Nuclear entry and nucleolar localization of the Newcastle disease virus (NDV) matrix protein occur early in infection and do not require other NDV proteins. J Virol 1992; 66:3263–3269
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/jgv.0.001362
Loading
/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/jgv.0.001362
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error